量化减轻健康脆弱性的战略:揭示机构质量与清洁能源的关系

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
B. Aslam, G. Zhang, M. A. Amjad, R. F. Rashid, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, R. Iqbal, R. K. Manavalan, Z. Ali
{"title":"量化减轻健康脆弱性的战略:揭示机构质量与清洁能源的关系","authors":"B. Aslam,&nbsp;G. Zhang,&nbsp;M. A. Amjad,&nbsp;R. F. Rashid,&nbsp;A. A. Al-Ghamdi,&nbsp;R. Iqbal,&nbsp;R. K. Manavalan,&nbsp;Z. Ali","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-06244-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>More than two billion of the poorest global populations still depend on traditional fuel to fulfill their household energy requirements. These resources include animal dung, charcoal, wood, and crop wastes. These energy resources not only impact their health due to environmental pollution but also cause extreme climate events. The present study explores the non-linear analysis of clean energy poverty for cooking on health vulnerability and then extends its application using institutional quality as the moderator. This study uses panel data of 80 developing countries from 2002 to 2020 by applying the Bootstrap Panel Quantile Regression (BPQR) approach at different quantile groups. This study proved a U-shaped association between clean energy poverty and health vulnerability in all quantile groups. It shows that higher clean energy poverty increases health vulnerability in most developing countries. The interplay of institutional quality with clean energy poverty moves the turning point to the left side of the U-shaped curve at the middle and higher quantile groups. It shows that institutional quality minimizes the adverse effect of health vulnerability by using clean energy poverty in developing countries. Furthermore, industrialization and labor force participation show mixed effects across quantile groups. This study recommends that developing countries should pay special attention to strengthening institutional quality to mitigate health vulnerability even a lower access to clean energy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"22 9","pages":"8211 - 8224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the strategies to mitigate health vulnerability: unveiling the nexus of institutional quality with clean energy\",\"authors\":\"B. Aslam,&nbsp;G. Zhang,&nbsp;M. A. Amjad,&nbsp;R. F. Rashid,&nbsp;A. A. Al-Ghamdi,&nbsp;R. Iqbal,&nbsp;R. K. Manavalan,&nbsp;Z. Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13762-024-06244-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>More than two billion of the poorest global populations still depend on traditional fuel to fulfill their household energy requirements. These resources include animal dung, charcoal, wood, and crop wastes. These energy resources not only impact their health due to environmental pollution but also cause extreme climate events. The present study explores the non-linear analysis of clean energy poverty for cooking on health vulnerability and then extends its application using institutional quality as the moderator. This study uses panel data of 80 developing countries from 2002 to 2020 by applying the Bootstrap Panel Quantile Regression (BPQR) approach at different quantile groups. This study proved a U-shaped association between clean energy poverty and health vulnerability in all quantile groups. It shows that higher clean energy poverty increases health vulnerability in most developing countries. The interplay of institutional quality with clean energy poverty moves the turning point to the left side of the U-shaped curve at the middle and higher quantile groups. It shows that institutional quality minimizes the adverse effect of health vulnerability by using clean energy poverty in developing countries. Furthermore, industrialization and labor force participation show mixed effects across quantile groups. This study recommends that developing countries should pay special attention to strengthening institutional quality to mitigate health vulnerability even a lower access to clean energy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"8211 - 8224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06244-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06244-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球20多亿最贫困人口仍然依靠传统燃料来满足家庭能源需求。这些资源包括动物粪便、木炭、木材和农作物废料。这些能源不仅因环境污染而影响他们的健康,而且还造成极端气候事件。本研究探索清洁能源贫困对健康脆弱性的非线性分析,并以制度质量为调节因子扩展其应用。本研究采用Bootstrap panel Quantile Regression (BPQR)方法,对80个发展中国家2002 - 2020年的面板数据进行分析。该研究证明,在所有分位数组中,清洁能源贫困与健康脆弱性之间呈u型关联。报告显示,在大多数发展中国家,清洁能源贫困加剧会增加健康脆弱性。制度质量与清洁能源贫困的相互作用使u型曲线的转折点在中、高分位数组的左侧移动。它表明,通过利用发展中国家的清洁能源贫困,机构质量可以最大限度地减少健康脆弱性的不利影响。此外,工业化和劳动力参与率在各个分位数群体中表现出混合效应。这项研究建议,发展中国家应特别注意加强机构质量,以减轻卫生脆弱性,即使获得清洁能源的机会较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying the strategies to mitigate health vulnerability: unveiling the nexus of institutional quality with clean energy

More than two billion of the poorest global populations still depend on traditional fuel to fulfill their household energy requirements. These resources include animal dung, charcoal, wood, and crop wastes. These energy resources not only impact their health due to environmental pollution but also cause extreme climate events. The present study explores the non-linear analysis of clean energy poverty for cooking on health vulnerability and then extends its application using institutional quality as the moderator. This study uses panel data of 80 developing countries from 2002 to 2020 by applying the Bootstrap Panel Quantile Regression (BPQR) approach at different quantile groups. This study proved a U-shaped association between clean energy poverty and health vulnerability in all quantile groups. It shows that higher clean energy poverty increases health vulnerability in most developing countries. The interplay of institutional quality with clean energy poverty moves the turning point to the left side of the U-shaped curve at the middle and higher quantile groups. It shows that institutional quality minimizes the adverse effect of health vulnerability by using clean energy poverty in developing countries. Furthermore, industrialization and labor force participation show mixed effects across quantile groups. This study recommends that developing countries should pay special attention to strengthening institutional quality to mitigate health vulnerability even a lower access to clean energy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信