Yang Liu , Zhaoyang Zeng , Chengguang Lai , Sijing He , Jie Jiang , Zhaoli Wang
{"title":"气候与环境变化下河流流域蓝绿水资源的归属与稀缺分析","authors":"Yang Liu , Zhaoyang Zeng , Chengguang Lai , Sijing He , Jie Jiang , Zhaoli Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Water resources are pivotal for sustaining human development. Understanding the variations and driving mechanisms of blue and green water resources is essential for the effective management and planning of regional water resources. Based on land use and land cover (LULC) data from 1980, 2000, and 2015, three SWAT models were developed for the Hanjiang River Basin (HRB), and five simulation scenarios were designed to estimate the spatiotemporal evolution, driving factors, and scarcity of blue water (BW) and green water (GW). The results indicate that BW is more abundant in the northern HRB, while GW is more concentrated in the south. The green water coefficient ranges from 0.39 to 0.60. In HRB, climate change is the primary driver of variations in BW and GW, with relative contributions of 72.03–79.49% and 50.79–52.25%, respectively. Among different LULC types, forest and cropland are significant drivers of both BW and GW changes. The contribution of urban land is higher in the second period (2000–2015) than in the first period (1975–2000). BW is strongly driven by precipitation and negatively affected by potential evapotranspiration (PET), while GW is primarily influenced by PET. From 2003 to 2016, the HRB experienced moderate blue water scarcity (average of 1.16) and moderate green water scarcity (average of 0.70). The Falkenmark Index for the HRB ranges from 500 to 1700, with an average of 1126.21, indicating prevailing water stress and water scarcity. Both blue and green water scarcity are mainly affected by precipitation, PET, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); PET exacerbates both, while precipitation and NDVI mitigate them. This study jointly assessed the attribution and scarcity of BW and GW and further analyzed the individual impacts of multiple climatic and LULC factors, offering a more nuanced perspective compared to previous studies. The findings provide a scientific basis for regional water resource management, agricultural water use optimization, and enhancement of ecosystem resilience under changing climate and land use conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113574"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attribution and scarcity analysis of blue and green water resources in a river basin under climate and environmental change\",\"authors\":\"Yang Liu , Zhaoyang Zeng , Chengguang Lai , Sijing He , Jie Jiang , Zhaoli Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Water resources are pivotal for sustaining human development. Understanding the variations and driving mechanisms of blue and green water resources is essential for the effective management and planning of regional water resources. Based on land use and land cover (LULC) data from 1980, 2000, and 2015, three SWAT models were developed for the Hanjiang River Basin (HRB), and five simulation scenarios were designed to estimate the spatiotemporal evolution, driving factors, and scarcity of blue water (BW) and green water (GW). The results indicate that BW is more abundant in the northern HRB, while GW is more concentrated in the south. The green water coefficient ranges from 0.39 to 0.60. In HRB, climate change is the primary driver of variations in BW and GW, with relative contributions of 72.03–79.49% and 50.79–52.25%, respectively. Among different LULC types, forest and cropland are significant drivers of both BW and GW changes. The contribution of urban land is higher in the second period (2000–2015) than in the first period (1975–2000). BW is strongly driven by precipitation and negatively affected by potential evapotranspiration (PET), while GW is primarily influenced by PET. From 2003 to 2016, the HRB experienced moderate blue water scarcity (average of 1.16) and moderate green water scarcity (average of 0.70). The Falkenmark Index for the HRB ranges from 500 to 1700, with an average of 1126.21, indicating prevailing water stress and water scarcity. Both blue and green water scarcity are mainly affected by precipitation, PET, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); PET exacerbates both, while precipitation and NDVI mitigate them. This study jointly assessed the attribution and scarcity of BW and GW and further analyzed the individual impacts of multiple climatic and LULC factors, offering a more nuanced perspective compared to previous studies. The findings provide a scientific basis for regional water resource management, agricultural water use optimization, and enhancement of ecosystem resilience under changing climate and land use conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25005047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Attribution and scarcity analysis of blue and green water resources in a river basin under climate and environmental change
Water resources are pivotal for sustaining human development. Understanding the variations and driving mechanisms of blue and green water resources is essential for the effective management and planning of regional water resources. Based on land use and land cover (LULC) data from 1980, 2000, and 2015, three SWAT models were developed for the Hanjiang River Basin (HRB), and five simulation scenarios were designed to estimate the spatiotemporal evolution, driving factors, and scarcity of blue water (BW) and green water (GW). The results indicate that BW is more abundant in the northern HRB, while GW is more concentrated in the south. The green water coefficient ranges from 0.39 to 0.60. In HRB, climate change is the primary driver of variations in BW and GW, with relative contributions of 72.03–79.49% and 50.79–52.25%, respectively. Among different LULC types, forest and cropland are significant drivers of both BW and GW changes. The contribution of urban land is higher in the second period (2000–2015) than in the first period (1975–2000). BW is strongly driven by precipitation and negatively affected by potential evapotranspiration (PET), while GW is primarily influenced by PET. From 2003 to 2016, the HRB experienced moderate blue water scarcity (average of 1.16) and moderate green water scarcity (average of 0.70). The Falkenmark Index for the HRB ranges from 500 to 1700, with an average of 1126.21, indicating prevailing water stress and water scarcity. Both blue and green water scarcity are mainly affected by precipitation, PET, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); PET exacerbates both, while precipitation and NDVI mitigate them. This study jointly assessed the attribution and scarcity of BW and GW and further analyzed the individual impacts of multiple climatic and LULC factors, offering a more nuanced perspective compared to previous studies. The findings provide a scientific basis for regional water resource management, agricultural water use optimization, and enhancement of ecosystem resilience under changing climate and land use conditions.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.