参与式贝叶斯网络用于发现战略环境风险管理中的反身性未知数

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Annukka Lehikoinen , Tapio Reinekoski , Nina Janasik , Marko Ahvenainen , Janne I. Hukkinen
{"title":"参与式贝叶斯网络用于发现战略环境风险管理中的反身性未知数","authors":"Annukka Lehikoinen ,&nbsp;Tapio Reinekoski ,&nbsp;Nina Janasik ,&nbsp;Marko Ahvenainen ,&nbsp;Janne I. Hukkinen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Strategic environmental risk management and planning must account for uncertainty and complexity, necessitating methods that facilitate scenario development under incomplete knowledge. This paper introduces a participatory modelling (PM) -based knowledge co-production and strategic planning approach utilizing one type of AI tool - Bayesian Networks (BN) - for systemic scenario development, analysis and resilience-building. The developed method integrates diverse perspectives and expertise of participants through a structured BN model, enabling co-imagination and -construction of causal pathways, translating them into probabilistic dependencies, and diagnostically identifying potential leverage points for strategic resilience-increasing actions. We illustrate and test this approach using a case study of a chemical transportation accident in an urban environment, documenting the participatory process and the algorithm to translate the participants’ thinking to a computational BN. Through content analysis of transcribed audio recordings, we demonstrate how the exercise helped uncover “reflexive unknowns” – previously unrecognized threats that became apparent and thinkable only through the collaborative modelling process. An example of such a reflexive unknown in our case exercise is the prospect of toxic rainfall following the accident and its short- and long-term implications for the built and natural environment. This was a blind spot in the thinking of the participants, and it appeared and became a scenario to be acted upon only as a result of the process of collective cross-sectoral causal thought represented with a BN model. The paper provides a detailed description of the developed participatory BN approach and methodology, enabling their applicability in various contexts. Through a qualitative analysis of the exercise’s implementation, the article also demonstrates how the approach fostered collective, iterative reflection, generating new insights to socio-environmental resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 125373"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory Bayesian Networks for uncovering reflexive unknowns in strategic environmental risk management\",\"authors\":\"Annukka Lehikoinen ,&nbsp;Tapio Reinekoski ,&nbsp;Nina Janasik ,&nbsp;Marko Ahvenainen ,&nbsp;Janne I. Hukkinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Strategic environmental risk management and planning must account for uncertainty and complexity, necessitating methods that facilitate scenario development under incomplete knowledge. This paper introduces a participatory modelling (PM) -based knowledge co-production and strategic planning approach utilizing one type of AI tool - Bayesian Networks (BN) - for systemic scenario development, analysis and resilience-building. The developed method integrates diverse perspectives and expertise of participants through a structured BN model, enabling co-imagination and -construction of causal pathways, translating them into probabilistic dependencies, and diagnostically identifying potential leverage points for strategic resilience-increasing actions. We illustrate and test this approach using a case study of a chemical transportation accident in an urban environment, documenting the participatory process and the algorithm to translate the participants’ thinking to a computational BN. Through content analysis of transcribed audio recordings, we demonstrate how the exercise helped uncover “reflexive unknowns” – previously unrecognized threats that became apparent and thinkable only through the collaborative modelling process. An example of such a reflexive unknown in our case exercise is the prospect of toxic rainfall following the accident and its short- and long-term implications for the built and natural environment. This was a blind spot in the thinking of the participants, and it appeared and became a scenario to be acted upon only as a result of the process of collective cross-sectoral causal thought represented with a BN model. The paper provides a detailed description of the developed participatory BN approach and methodology, enabling their applicability in various contexts. Through a qualitative analysis of the exercise’s implementation, the article also demonstrates how the approach fostered collective, iterative reflection, generating new insights to socio-environmental resilience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"384 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013490\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战略环境风险管理和规划必须考虑到不确定性和复杂性,需要在不完全知识的情况下促进情景发展的方法。本文介绍了一种基于参与式建模(PM)的知识协同生产和战略规划方法,利用一种人工智能工具-贝叶斯网络(BN) -进行系统场景开发,分析和弹性建设。所开发的方法通过结构化的BN模型集成了参与者的不同观点和专业知识,实现了共同想象和因果路径的构建,将其转化为概率依赖关系,并诊断识别战略弹性增加行动的潜在杠杆点。我们使用城市环境中的化学品运输事故案例研究来说明和测试这种方法,记录参与过程和将参与者的思维转化为计算BN的算法。通过对转录的音频记录的内容分析,我们展示了该练习如何帮助发现“反射性未知”——以前未被认识到的威胁,只有通过协作建模过程才能变得明显和可想象。在我们的案例练习中,这种反射性未知的一个例子是事故后有毒降雨的前景及其对建筑和自然环境的短期和长期影响。这是参与者思维中的一个盲点,它的出现并成为一个场景,仅作为以BN模型代表的集体跨部门因果思维过程的结果。本文提供了开发参与式BN方法和方法的详细描述,使其适用于各种情况。通过对练习实施的定性分析,文章还展示了该方法如何促进集体,迭代反思,产生对社会环境恢复力的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participatory Bayesian Networks for uncovering reflexive unknowns in strategic environmental risk management
Strategic environmental risk management and planning must account for uncertainty and complexity, necessitating methods that facilitate scenario development under incomplete knowledge. This paper introduces a participatory modelling (PM) -based knowledge co-production and strategic planning approach utilizing one type of AI tool - Bayesian Networks (BN) - for systemic scenario development, analysis and resilience-building. The developed method integrates diverse perspectives and expertise of participants through a structured BN model, enabling co-imagination and -construction of causal pathways, translating them into probabilistic dependencies, and diagnostically identifying potential leverage points for strategic resilience-increasing actions. We illustrate and test this approach using a case study of a chemical transportation accident in an urban environment, documenting the participatory process and the algorithm to translate the participants’ thinking to a computational BN. Through content analysis of transcribed audio recordings, we demonstrate how the exercise helped uncover “reflexive unknowns” – previously unrecognized threats that became apparent and thinkable only through the collaborative modelling process. An example of such a reflexive unknown in our case exercise is the prospect of toxic rainfall following the accident and its short- and long-term implications for the built and natural environment. This was a blind spot in the thinking of the participants, and it appeared and became a scenario to be acted upon only as a result of the process of collective cross-sectoral causal thought represented with a BN model. The paper provides a detailed description of the developed participatory BN approach and methodology, enabling their applicability in various contexts. Through a qualitative analysis of the exercise’s implementation, the article also demonstrates how the approach fostered collective, iterative reflection, generating new insights to socio-environmental resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信