公共产品的环境与社会权衡:欧洲的跨国比较

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yan Jin
{"title":"公共产品的环境与社会权衡:欧洲的跨国比较","authors":"Yan Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental-social trade-offs are essential but often overlooked. This study addresses the gap by examining citizens' willingness to pay (WTP) for public goods—carbon emissions, biodiversity (environmental indicators), and local employment (social indicator)—in seven European Union regions: northern and southern Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, and Poland. A hypothetical choice experiment evaluates public perceptions of the environmental-social trade-offs. Results show heterogeneity in how citizens perceive the relative importance of public goods. The main determinants of WTP include age, gender, distance to the innovation site, belief in climate change, trust in government, and environmental awareness. Key determinants contribute differently to the WTP for public goods across Europe. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries regarding trust in government and the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) score has been found mainly in the social aspect. Considering environmental-social trade-offs in a socially inclusive context is essential for future Common Agriculture Policy reforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108347"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental-social trade-offs for public goods: A cross-country comparison in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Yan Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Environmental-social trade-offs are essential but often overlooked. This study addresses the gap by examining citizens' willingness to pay (WTP) for public goods—carbon emissions, biodiversity (environmental indicators), and local employment (social indicator)—in seven European Union regions: northern and southern Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, and Poland. A hypothetical choice experiment evaluates public perceptions of the environmental-social trade-offs. Results show heterogeneity in how citizens perceive the relative importance of public goods. The main determinants of WTP include age, gender, distance to the innovation site, belief in climate change, trust in government, and environmental awareness. Key determinants contribute differently to the WTP for public goods across Europe. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries regarding trust in government and the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) score has been found mainly in the social aspect. Considering environmental-social trade-offs in a socially inclusive context is essential for future Common Agriculture Policy reforms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002265\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境与社会之间的权衡至关重要,但往往被忽视。本研究通过考察公民对公共产品(碳排放、生物多样性(环境指标)和当地就业(社会指标))的支付意愿(WTP)来解决这一差距,研究对象为七个欧盟地区:西班牙北部和南部、法国、匈牙利、意大利、荷兰和波兰。一个假设的选择实验评估公众对环境与社会权衡的看法。结果显示,公民在如何看待公共产品的相对重要性方面存在异质性。WTP的主要决定因素包括年龄、性别、与创新地点的距离、对气候变化的信念、对政府的信任和环境意识。关键决定因素对欧洲公共产品WTP的贡献不同。此外,各国在政府信任和新生态范式(NEP)得分方面的异质性主要体现在社会方面。在社会包容的背景下考虑环境与社会的权衡对于未来的共同农业政策改革至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental-social trade-offs for public goods: A cross-country comparison in Europe
Environmental-social trade-offs are essential but often overlooked. This study addresses the gap by examining citizens' willingness to pay (WTP) for public goods—carbon emissions, biodiversity (environmental indicators), and local employment (social indicator)—in seven European Union regions: northern and southern Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, and Poland. A hypothetical choice experiment evaluates public perceptions of the environmental-social trade-offs. Results show heterogeneity in how citizens perceive the relative importance of public goods. The main determinants of WTP include age, gender, distance to the innovation site, belief in climate change, trust in government, and environmental awareness. Key determinants contribute differently to the WTP for public goods across Europe. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries regarding trust in government and the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) score has been found mainly in the social aspect. Considering environmental-social trade-offs in a socially inclusive context is essential for future Common Agriculture Policy reforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信