{"title":"公共产品的环境与社会权衡:欧洲的跨国比较","authors":"Yan Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental-social trade-offs are essential but often overlooked. This study addresses the gap by examining citizens' willingness to pay (WTP) for public goods—carbon emissions, biodiversity (environmental indicators), and local employment (social indicator)—in seven European Union regions: northern and southern Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, and Poland. A hypothetical choice experiment evaluates public perceptions of the environmental-social trade-offs. Results show heterogeneity in how citizens perceive the relative importance of public goods. The main determinants of WTP include age, gender, distance to the innovation site, belief in climate change, trust in government, and environmental awareness. Key determinants contribute differently to the WTP for public goods across Europe. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries regarding trust in government and the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) score has been found mainly in the social aspect. Considering environmental-social trade-offs in a socially inclusive context is essential for future Common Agriculture Policy reforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108347"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental-social trade-offs for public goods: A cross-country comparison in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Yan Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Environmental-social trade-offs are essential but often overlooked. This study addresses the gap by examining citizens' willingness to pay (WTP) for public goods—carbon emissions, biodiversity (environmental indicators), and local employment (social indicator)—in seven European Union regions: northern and southern Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, and Poland. A hypothetical choice experiment evaluates public perceptions of the environmental-social trade-offs. Results show heterogeneity in how citizens perceive the relative importance of public goods. The main determinants of WTP include age, gender, distance to the innovation site, belief in climate change, trust in government, and environmental awareness. Key determinants contribute differently to the WTP for public goods across Europe. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries regarding trust in government and the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) score has been found mainly in the social aspect. Considering environmental-social trade-offs in a socially inclusive context is essential for future Common Agriculture Policy reforms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002265\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002265","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Environmental-social trade-offs for public goods: A cross-country comparison in Europe
Environmental-social trade-offs are essential but often overlooked. This study addresses the gap by examining citizens' willingness to pay (WTP) for public goods—carbon emissions, biodiversity (environmental indicators), and local employment (social indicator)—in seven European Union regions: northern and southern Spain, France, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, and Poland. A hypothetical choice experiment evaluates public perceptions of the environmental-social trade-offs. Results show heterogeneity in how citizens perceive the relative importance of public goods. The main determinants of WTP include age, gender, distance to the innovation site, belief in climate change, trust in government, and environmental awareness. Key determinants contribute differently to the WTP for public goods across Europe. Additionally, heterogeneity across countries regarding trust in government and the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) score has been found mainly in the social aspect. Considering environmental-social trade-offs in a socially inclusive context is essential for future Common Agriculture Policy reforms.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.