农业生态系统服务制图。系统回顾

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Miguel Inácio , Eglė Baltranaitė , Marija Meišutovič-Akhtarieva , Damià Barceló , Wenwu Zhao , Paulo Pereira
{"title":"农业生态系统服务制图。系统回顾","authors":"Miguel Inácio ,&nbsp;Eglė Baltranaitė ,&nbsp;Marija Meišutovič-Akhtarieva ,&nbsp;Damià Barceló ,&nbsp;Wenwu Zhao ,&nbsp;Paulo Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agriculture is one of the major drivers of land degradation and climate change. It is known that it can have positive impacts on provisioning ecosystem services (ES) (e.g., food production); however, it has as well detrimental effects on regulation and maintenance (e.g., carbon sequestration) and cultural ES (e.g., landscape aesthetics). Mapping helps us to understand the spatio-temporal impacts on agriculture ES. Nevertheless, no global assessment on mapping agriculture ES was conducted. To fill this gap, this work aims to review the studies systematically focused on mapping agriculture ES, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement protocol. Overall, 52 studies were considered in this analysis. The results showed an increase in research from 2013 to 2024, mainly developed in Europe and Asia, with a special focus on the rural regions of the countries. Most studies did not follow a specific ES classification, focused on ES supply and assessed one ES dimension. <em>Cultivated terrestrial plants for nutrition, materials or energy</em> was the most mapped provisioning ES group. <em>Regulation of baseline flows and extreme events</em> and <em>Intellectual and representative interactions with the natural environment</em> were the most analysed regulation &amp; maintenance and cultural ES groups, respectively. Regarding the methodology, the majority of studies applied mixed approaches. Finally, a large proportion of works did not consider any tradeoffs, drivers of change, and future predictions and did not validate the obtained ES model results. This work is key to understanding the areas where agricultural ES were mapped and supporting policymaking to identify informed decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"981 ","pages":"Article 179499"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping agricultural ecosystem services. A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Inácio ,&nbsp;Eglė Baltranaitė ,&nbsp;Marija Meišutovič-Akhtarieva ,&nbsp;Damià Barceló ,&nbsp;Wenwu Zhao ,&nbsp;Paulo Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Agriculture is one of the major drivers of land degradation and climate change. It is known that it can have positive impacts on provisioning ecosystem services (ES) (e.g., food production); however, it has as well detrimental effects on regulation and maintenance (e.g., carbon sequestration) and cultural ES (e.g., landscape aesthetics). Mapping helps us to understand the spatio-temporal impacts on agriculture ES. Nevertheless, no global assessment on mapping agriculture ES was conducted. To fill this gap, this work aims to review the studies systematically focused on mapping agriculture ES, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement protocol. Overall, 52 studies were considered in this analysis. The results showed an increase in research from 2013 to 2024, mainly developed in Europe and Asia, with a special focus on the rural regions of the countries. Most studies did not follow a specific ES classification, focused on ES supply and assessed one ES dimension. <em>Cultivated terrestrial plants for nutrition, materials or energy</em> was the most mapped provisioning ES group. <em>Regulation of baseline flows and extreme events</em> and <em>Intellectual and representative interactions with the natural environment</em> were the most analysed regulation &amp; maintenance and cultural ES groups, respectively. Regarding the methodology, the majority of studies applied mixed approaches. Finally, a large proportion of works did not consider any tradeoffs, drivers of change, and future predictions and did not validate the obtained ES model results. This work is key to understanding the areas where agricultural ES were mapped and supporting policymaking to identify informed decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"981 \",\"pages\":\"Article 179499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725011362\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725011362","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业是土地退化和气候变化的主要驱动因素之一。众所周知,它可以对提供生态系统服务(例如粮食生产)产生积极影响;然而,它也对调节和维护(如碳固存)和文化ES(如景观美学)产生不利影响。制图有助于我们了解农业生态系统的时空影响。然而,没有对农业ES制图进行全球评估。为了填补这一空白,本工作旨在根据系统评价和元分析声明协议的首选报告项目,系统地回顾有关农业ES制图的研究。总的来说,本分析纳入了52项研究。结果显示,从2013年到2024年,研究增加了,主要集中在欧洲和亚洲,特别关注这些国家的农村地区。大多数研究没有遵循特定的ES分类,关注ES供应并评估一个ES维度。栽培陆生植物为营养、物质或能源提供最多的ES组。基线流量和极端事件的调节以及与自然环境的智力和代表性相互作用是分析最多的调节&;维修组和文化ES组。关于方法,大多数研究采用混合方法。最后,很大一部分工作没有考虑任何权衡、变化的驱动因素和未来预测,也没有验证获得的ES模型结果。这项工作是了解绘制农业生态系统地图的领域和支持政策制定以确定明智决策的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mapping agricultural ecosystem services. A systematic review

Mapping agricultural ecosystem services. A systematic review
Agriculture is one of the major drivers of land degradation and climate change. It is known that it can have positive impacts on provisioning ecosystem services (ES) (e.g., food production); however, it has as well detrimental effects on regulation and maintenance (e.g., carbon sequestration) and cultural ES (e.g., landscape aesthetics). Mapping helps us to understand the spatio-temporal impacts on agriculture ES. Nevertheless, no global assessment on mapping agriculture ES was conducted. To fill this gap, this work aims to review the studies systematically focused on mapping agriculture ES, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement protocol. Overall, 52 studies were considered in this analysis. The results showed an increase in research from 2013 to 2024, mainly developed in Europe and Asia, with a special focus on the rural regions of the countries. Most studies did not follow a specific ES classification, focused on ES supply and assessed one ES dimension. Cultivated terrestrial plants for nutrition, materials or energy was the most mapped provisioning ES group. Regulation of baseline flows and extreme events and Intellectual and representative interactions with the natural environment were the most analysed regulation & maintenance and cultural ES groups, respectively. Regarding the methodology, the majority of studies applied mixed approaches. Finally, a large proportion of works did not consider any tradeoffs, drivers of change, and future predictions and did not validate the obtained ES model results. This work is key to understanding the areas where agricultural ES were mapped and supporting policymaking to identify informed decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信