{"title":"点对点住宅充电器共享:探索加州公众的看法","authors":"Amin Akbari , Matthew D. Dean","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing (P2P-EVSE) matches private electric vehicle (EV) chargers with drivers seeking near-home charging alternatives. We surveyed 367 California EV households to assess their perceptions of this emerging service. Approximately 28% of respondents expressed willingness to host and 31% to rent through a P2P-EVSE platform. Hosts prioritized rental income, while renters valued charging convenience and cost savings. Liability concerns were the primary deterrent for both groups, with environmental benefits considered less critical. EV drivers in detached houses showed lower interest in renting, while those with above-average mileage and daily charging habits showed higher interest. The success of P2P-EVSE in reducing barriers to near-home charging access will depend on matching price offers and bids. Regions like Southern California, where cost disparities between home and public charging are greater, have a higher match probability. Further research and policy development to support P2P-EVSE could quickly integrate private chargers into the marketplace.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104788"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing: Exploring public perceptions in California\",\"authors\":\"Amin Akbari , Matthew D. Dean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing (P2P-EVSE) matches private electric vehicle (EV) chargers with drivers seeking near-home charging alternatives. We surveyed 367 California EV households to assess their perceptions of this emerging service. Approximately 28% of respondents expressed willingness to host and 31% to rent through a P2P-EVSE platform. Hosts prioritized rental income, while renters valued charging convenience and cost savings. Liability concerns were the primary deterrent for both groups, with environmental benefits considered less critical. EV drivers in detached houses showed lower interest in renting, while those with above-average mileage and daily charging habits showed higher interest. The success of P2P-EVSE in reducing barriers to near-home charging access will depend on matching price offers and bids. Regions like Southern California, where cost disparities between home and public charging are greater, have a higher match probability. Further research and policy development to support P2P-EVSE could quickly integrate private chargers into the marketplace.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925001981\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925001981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing: Exploring public perceptions in California
Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing (P2P-EVSE) matches private electric vehicle (EV) chargers with drivers seeking near-home charging alternatives. We surveyed 367 California EV households to assess their perceptions of this emerging service. Approximately 28% of respondents expressed willingness to host and 31% to rent through a P2P-EVSE platform. Hosts prioritized rental income, while renters valued charging convenience and cost savings. Liability concerns were the primary deterrent for both groups, with environmental benefits considered less critical. EV drivers in detached houses showed lower interest in renting, while those with above-average mileage and daily charging habits showed higher interest. The success of P2P-EVSE in reducing barriers to near-home charging access will depend on matching price offers and bids. Regions like Southern California, where cost disparities between home and public charging are greater, have a higher match probability. Further research and policy development to support P2P-EVSE could quickly integrate private chargers into the marketplace.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.