点对点住宅充电器共享:探索加州公众的看法

IF 7.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Amin Akbari , Matthew D. Dean
{"title":"点对点住宅充电器共享:探索加州公众的看法","authors":"Amin Akbari ,&nbsp;Matthew D. Dean","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing (P2P-EVSE) matches private electric vehicle (EV) chargers with drivers seeking near-home charging alternatives. We surveyed 367 California EV households to assess their perceptions of this emerging service. Approximately 28% of respondents expressed willingness to host and 31% to rent through a P2P-EVSE platform. Hosts prioritized rental income, while renters valued charging convenience and cost savings. Liability concerns were the primary deterrent for both groups, with environmental benefits considered less critical. EV drivers in detached houses showed lower interest in renting, while those with above-average mileage and daily charging habits showed higher interest. The success of P2P-EVSE in reducing barriers to near-home charging access will depend on matching price offers and bids. Regions like Southern California, where cost disparities between home and public charging are greater, have a higher match probability. Further research and policy development to support P2P-EVSE could quickly integrate private chargers into the marketplace.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104788"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing: Exploring public perceptions in California\",\"authors\":\"Amin Akbari ,&nbsp;Matthew D. Dean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing (P2P-EVSE) matches private electric vehicle (EV) chargers with drivers seeking near-home charging alternatives. We surveyed 367 California EV households to assess their perceptions of this emerging service. Approximately 28% of respondents expressed willingness to host and 31% to rent through a P2P-EVSE platform. Hosts prioritized rental income, while renters valued charging convenience and cost savings. Liability concerns were the primary deterrent for both groups, with environmental benefits considered less critical. EV drivers in detached houses showed lower interest in renting, while those with above-average mileage and daily charging habits showed higher interest. The success of P2P-EVSE in reducing barriers to near-home charging access will depend on matching price offers and bids. Regions like Southern California, where cost disparities between home and public charging are greater, have a higher match probability. Further research and policy development to support P2P-EVSE could quickly integrate private chargers into the marketplace.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925001981\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925001981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

点对点住宅充电器共享(P2P-EVSE)将私人电动汽车(EV)充电器与寻求就近充电选择的司机相匹配。我们调查了367个加州电动汽车家庭,以评估他们对这项新兴服务的看法。大约28%的受访者表示愿意通过P2P-EVSE平台托管,31%的受访者表示愿意通过P2P-EVSE平台租赁。房东优先考虑的是租金收入,而租房者看重的是充电方便和节省成本。责任问题是这两个群体的主要障碍,环境效益被认为不那么重要。独立住宅的电动汽车司机对租赁的兴趣较低,而里程和日常充电习惯高于平均水平的电动汽车司机对租赁的兴趣较高。P2P-EVSE在减少就近充电接入障碍方面的成功将取决于报价和投标的匹配。像南加州这样的地区,家庭和公共充电之间的成本差距更大,匹配的可能性更高。支持P2P-EVSE的进一步研究和政策制定可以迅速将私人充电器纳入市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing: Exploring public perceptions in California
Peer-to-peer residential charger sharing (P2P-EVSE) matches private electric vehicle (EV) chargers with drivers seeking near-home charging alternatives. We surveyed 367 California EV households to assess their perceptions of this emerging service. Approximately 28% of respondents expressed willingness to host and 31% to rent through a P2P-EVSE platform. Hosts prioritized rental income, while renters valued charging convenience and cost savings. Liability concerns were the primary deterrent for both groups, with environmental benefits considered less critical. EV drivers in detached houses showed lower interest in renting, while those with above-average mileage and daily charging habits showed higher interest. The success of P2P-EVSE in reducing barriers to near-home charging access will depend on matching price offers and bids. Regions like Southern California, where cost disparities between home and public charging are greater, have a higher match probability. Further research and policy development to support P2P-EVSE could quickly integrate private chargers into the marketplace.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
314
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信