海洋港口作业的定量人体工程学风险评估模型：球面模糊- fucom - artasi综合方法

IF 4.8 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY

Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107710

Veysel Tatar , Berk Ayvaz , Dragan Pamucar

{"title":"海洋港口作业的定量人体工程学风险评估模型：球面模糊- fucom - artasi综合方法","authors":"Veysel Tatar , Berk Ayvaz , Dragan Pamucar","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study is to enhance a novel ergonomics risk assessment tool for workers in maritime port operations by implementing and validating two innovative methodologies, namely, the FUCOM and ARTASI methods. The integration of the Fine-Kinney method and spherical fuzzy sets into these methods provides a detailed understanding of the risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in various port operations. The primary findings demonstrate the efficacy of FUCOM and ARTASI in evaluating risk magnitudes for diverse health factors, offering valuable insights for risk classification and proposing effective control measures. The study's findings indicate that the top five most significant hazards are <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>6</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Heavy lifting, pulling, pushing, stacking), <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Lashing and unlashing operations), <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>12</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Working long hours or on shifts), <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Poor posture/awkward postures), and <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>10</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Work-related stress). The study underscores the necessity for future research to enhance knowledge in this domain, thereby facilitating a more profound comprehension of occupational risk areas and the strategies implemented by occupational health and safety (OHS) management systems in the port environment in an integrated manner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 107710"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative ergonomic risk assessment model of maritime port operations: An integrated spherical fuzzy-FUCOM-ARTASI approach\",\"authors\":\"Veysel Tatar , Berk Ayvaz , Dragan Pamucar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The objective of this study is to enhance a novel ergonomics risk assessment tool for workers in maritime port operations by implementing and validating two innovative methodologies, namely, the FUCOM and ARTASI methods. The integration of the Fine-Kinney method and spherical fuzzy sets into these methods provides a detailed understanding of the risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in various port operations. The primary findings demonstrate the efficacy of FUCOM and ARTASI in evaluating risk magnitudes for diverse health factors, offering valuable insights for risk classification and proposing effective control measures. The study's findings indicate that the top five most significant hazards are <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>6</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Heavy lifting, pulling, pushing, stacking), <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Lashing and unlashing operations), <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>12</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Working long hours or on shifts), <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>1</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Poor posture/awkward postures), and <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi></mrow><mn>10</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (Work-related stress). The study underscores the necessity for future research to enhance knowledge in this domain, thereby facilitating a more profound comprehension of occupational risk areas and the strategies implemented by occupational health and safety (OHS) management systems in the port environment in an integrated manner.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"267 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001723\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过实施和验证两种创新方法，即FUCOM和ARTASI方法，为海运港口作业中的工人增强一种新的人体工程学风险评估工具。将Fine-Kinney方法和球形模糊集集成到这些方法中，可以详细了解各种港口作业中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病（WMSDs）的风险。初步研究结果表明，FUCOM和ARTASI在评估不同健康因素的风险程度方面具有有效性，为风险分类和提出有效的控制措施提供了有价值的见解。研究结果表明，五大最严重的危害是ERG6（重提、拉、推、堆放）、ERG2（绑扎和解绑操作）、ERG12（长时间工作或轮班）、ERG1（不良姿势/尴尬姿势）和ERG10（工作压力）。本研究强调未来的研究需要加强这一领域的知识，从而促进对职业风险领域和职业健康与安全（OHS）管理系统在港口环境中以综合方式实施的策略的更深刻理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A quantitative ergonomic risk assessment model of maritime port operations: An integrated spherical fuzzy-FUCOM-ARTASI approach

The objective of this study is to enhance a novel ergonomics risk assessment tool for workers in maritime port operations by implementing and validating two innovative methodologies, namely, the FUCOM and ARTASI methods. The integration of the Fine-Kinney method and spherical fuzzy sets into these methods provides a detailed understanding of the risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in various port operations. The primary findings demonstrate the efficacy of FUCOM and ARTASI in evaluating risk magnitudes for diverse health factors, offering valuable insights for risk classification and proposing effective control measures. The study's findings indicate that the top five most significant hazards are

{E R G}_{6}

(Heavy lifting, pulling, pushing, stacking),

{E R G}_{2}

(Lashing and unlashing operations),

{E R G}_{12}

(Working long hours or on shifts),

{E R G}_{1}

(Poor posture/awkward postures), and

{E R G}_{10}

(Work-related stress). The study underscores the necessity for future research to enhance knowledge in this domain, thereby facilitating a more profound comprehension of occupational risk areas and the strategies implemented by occupational health and safety (OHS) management systems in the port environment in an integrated manner.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学

CiteScore

8.50

自引率

15.20%

发文量

321

审稿时长

60 days

期刊介绍： Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.