绿色欺骗的阴影——对创新的绿色清洗后果的实证检验

IF 4.2 3区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Franziska Janz, Slawka Jordanow, Sven Heidenreich, Juliane Schäfer
{"title":"绿色欺骗的阴影——对创新的绿色清洗后果的实证检验","authors":"Franziska Janz,&nbsp;Slawka Jordanow,&nbsp;Sven Heidenreich,&nbsp;Juliane Schäfer","doi":"10.1111/caim.12639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The urgency to launch sustainable innovations rapidly in competitive markets increases the risk of greenwashing, as companies may overstate their products' environmental benefits. This article sheds light on the potential repercussions of deceptive sustainability claims within the realm of product innovations. Using four scenario-based experiments, this study reveals that exposure of greenwashing damages brand perception, a critical factor in the diffusion of innovations, even more than if products lacked green attributes at all. Findings from mediation analyses reveal that these reactions stem from negative disconfirmations, arising from a perceived discrepancy between expected sustainability and quality beliefs and the product's failure to meet these expectations. Moreover, this research deepens our understanding of greenwashing by providing the first empirical evidence that the intensity and focus of greenwashing activities on core components of product innovations significantly exacerbate the adverse effects. Overall, our study not only replicates findings on the detrimental effects of greenwashing in product innovation contexts but also advances the theoretical understanding by identifying the psychological processes behind these effects and their variations with greenwashing intensity and focus. In doing so, results advocate for a shift from a one-dimensional, uniformly perspective to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between greenwashing intensity and focus on consumer responses. From a practical perspective, the results underscore the risks of greenwashing in sustainable innovation contexts and emphasize the crucial role of transparency and authenticity in sustainability claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":47923,"journal":{"name":"Creativity and Innovation Management","volume":"34 2","pages":"312-332"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/caim.12639","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shades of green deception—An empirical examination into the consequences of greenwashing of innovations\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Janz,&nbsp;Slawka Jordanow,&nbsp;Sven Heidenreich,&nbsp;Juliane Schäfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/caim.12639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The urgency to launch sustainable innovations rapidly in competitive markets increases the risk of greenwashing, as companies may overstate their products' environmental benefits. This article sheds light on the potential repercussions of deceptive sustainability claims within the realm of product innovations. Using four scenario-based experiments, this study reveals that exposure of greenwashing damages brand perception, a critical factor in the diffusion of innovations, even more than if products lacked green attributes at all. Findings from mediation analyses reveal that these reactions stem from negative disconfirmations, arising from a perceived discrepancy between expected sustainability and quality beliefs and the product's failure to meet these expectations. Moreover, this research deepens our understanding of greenwashing by providing the first empirical evidence that the intensity and focus of greenwashing activities on core components of product innovations significantly exacerbate the adverse effects. Overall, our study not only replicates findings on the detrimental effects of greenwashing in product innovation contexts but also advances the theoretical understanding by identifying the psychological processes behind these effects and their variations with greenwashing intensity and focus. In doing so, results advocate for a shift from a one-dimensional, uniformly perspective to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between greenwashing intensity and focus on consumer responses. From a practical perspective, the results underscore the risks of greenwashing in sustainable innovation contexts and emphasize the crucial role of transparency and authenticity in sustainability claims.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creativity and Innovation Management\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"312-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/caim.12639\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creativity and Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caim.12639\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity and Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caim.12639","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在竞争激烈的市场中迅速推出可持续创新的紧迫性增加了“漂绿”的风险,因为企业可能夸大其产品的环境效益。这篇文章阐明了在产品创新领域内欺骗性可持续性主张的潜在影响。通过四个基于场景的实验,本研究发现,与产品完全缺乏绿色属性相比,绿色洗白对品牌认知的损害更大,而品牌认知是创新传播的关键因素。中介分析的结果表明,这些反应源于负面的不确认,源于预期可持续性和质量信念之间的感知差异以及产品未能满足这些期望。此外,本研究通过提供第一个经验证据,加深了我们对绿洗的理解,即产品创新核心组件的绿洗活动的强度和重点显著加剧了不利影响。总体而言,我们的研究不仅重复了产品创新背景下绿洗有害影响的研究结果,而且通过确定这些影响背后的心理过程及其随绿洗强度和焦点的变化,推进了理论理解。在这样做的过程中,结果提倡从一维的,统一的角度转变为对绿色清洗强度和关注消费者反应之间相互作用的更细致的理解。从实践的角度来看,研究结果强调了在可持续创新背景下洗绿的风险,并强调了透明度和真实性在可持续发展主张中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Shades of green deception—An empirical examination into the consequences of greenwashing of innovations

Shades of green deception—An empirical examination into the consequences of greenwashing of innovations

The urgency to launch sustainable innovations rapidly in competitive markets increases the risk of greenwashing, as companies may overstate their products' environmental benefits. This article sheds light on the potential repercussions of deceptive sustainability claims within the realm of product innovations. Using four scenario-based experiments, this study reveals that exposure of greenwashing damages brand perception, a critical factor in the diffusion of innovations, even more than if products lacked green attributes at all. Findings from mediation analyses reveal that these reactions stem from negative disconfirmations, arising from a perceived discrepancy between expected sustainability and quality beliefs and the product's failure to meet these expectations. Moreover, this research deepens our understanding of greenwashing by providing the first empirical evidence that the intensity and focus of greenwashing activities on core components of product innovations significantly exacerbate the adverse effects. Overall, our study not only replicates findings on the detrimental effects of greenwashing in product innovation contexts but also advances the theoretical understanding by identifying the psychological processes behind these effects and their variations with greenwashing intensity and focus. In doing so, results advocate for a shift from a one-dimensional, uniformly perspective to a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between greenwashing intensity and focus on consumer responses. From a practical perspective, the results underscore the risks of greenwashing in sustainable innovation contexts and emphasize the crucial role of transparency and authenticity in sustainability claims.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.40%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Creativity and Innovation Management bridges the gap between the theory and practice of organizing imagination and innovation. The journal''s central consideration is how to challenge and facilitate creative potential, and how then to embed this into results-oriented innovative business development. The creativity of individuals, coupled with structured and well-managed innovation projects, creates a sound base from which organizations may operate effectively within their inter-organizational and societal environment. Today, successful operations must go hand in hand with the ability to anticipate future opportunities. Therefore, a cultural focus and inspiring leadership are as crucial to an organization''s success as efficient structural arrangements and support facilities. This is reflected in the journal''s contents: -Leadership for creativity and innovation; the behavioural side of innovation management. -Organizational structures and processes to support creativity and innovation; interconnecting creative and innovative processes. -Creativity, motivation, work environment/creative climate and organizational behaviour, creative and innovative entrepreneurship. -Deliberate development of creative and innovative skills including the use of a variety of tools such as TRIZ or CPS. -Creative professions and personalities; creative products; the relationship between creativity and humour; arts and amp; humanities side of creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信