印度绝育营的日常道德规范

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eva Fiks
{"title":"印度绝育营的日常道德规范","authors":"Eva Fiks","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This ethnographic paper examines how various professionals working within sterilization camps in India engage with everyday ethics. While sterilization in India—and its place within India's population control programme historically entrenched in overtly and covertly coercive measures—gathers significant ethical concern in the scholarly and activist circles, extensive ethnographic engagement within sterilization camps in rural Rajasthan in 2012–2013 demonstrates that biomedical and bureaucratic personnel involved in the organisation of the camps are not preoccupied with dramatic ethical considerations during the majority of their time performing various duties in the camps. While they are not preoccupied with a question of ‘Is this ethical?’, they often do see their actions as fundamentally moral. This paper argues that while different ethical reasonings co-exist and clash within the camp, professionals working in sterilization camps view their work as ethical despite the controversial nature of sterilization in the country. Disgust plays a significant role in shaping the moral imperative surrounding sterilization: disgust felt by professionals towards sterilization patients, rooted in caste and class hierarchies, reinforces professionals' belief that they are engaged in humanitarian work by providing services to a population perceived as ‘backward.’ In the context of the impeding climate crisis and the proliferating discourses that return to the question of (over)population, it is important to understand the ethical worlds of professionals who carry out population control programmes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"377 ","pages":"Article 118150"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The everyday ethics in sterilization camps in India\",\"authors\":\"Eva Fiks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This ethnographic paper examines how various professionals working within sterilization camps in India engage with everyday ethics. While sterilization in India—and its place within India's population control programme historically entrenched in overtly and covertly coercive measures—gathers significant ethical concern in the scholarly and activist circles, extensive ethnographic engagement within sterilization camps in rural Rajasthan in 2012–2013 demonstrates that biomedical and bureaucratic personnel involved in the organisation of the camps are not preoccupied with dramatic ethical considerations during the majority of their time performing various duties in the camps. While they are not preoccupied with a question of ‘Is this ethical?’, they often do see their actions as fundamentally moral. This paper argues that while different ethical reasonings co-exist and clash within the camp, professionals working in sterilization camps view their work as ethical despite the controversial nature of sterilization in the country. Disgust plays a significant role in shaping the moral imperative surrounding sterilization: disgust felt by professionals towards sterilization patients, rooted in caste and class hierarchies, reinforces professionals' belief that they are engaged in humanitarian work by providing services to a population perceived as ‘backward.’ In the context of the impeding climate crisis and the proliferating discourses that return to the question of (over)population, it is important to understand the ethical worlds of professionals who carry out population control programmes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"377 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004800\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004800","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇民族志论文探讨了在印度绝育营工作的各种专业人员如何参与日常伦理。尽管印度的绝育——以及它在印度人口控制计划中的地位——在历史上一直是公开或隐蔽的强制性措施——引起了学术界和活动人士的重大伦理关注,2012-2013年,拉贾斯坦邦农村绝育营内广泛的人种学参与表明,参与营地组织的生物医学和官僚人员在营地执行各种职责的大部分时间里,并没有被戏剧性的道德考虑所占据。虽然他们没有全神贯注于“这样做合乎道德吗?”,他们通常认为自己的行为从根本上讲是道德的。本文认为,尽管不同的伦理推理在营地内共存和冲突,但在绝育营工作的专业人员认为他们的工作是道德的,尽管该国的绝育具有争议性。厌恶在塑造围绕绝育的道德义务方面发挥着重要作用:专业人员对绝育患者的厌恶根植于种姓和阶级等级,这强化了专业人员的信念,即他们通过向被视为“落后”的人群提供服务,从事人道主义工作。“在阻碍气候危机的背景下,以及回到(过度)人口问题的激增的话语,了解执行人口控制计划的专业人员的道德世界是很重要的。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The everyday ethics in sterilization camps in India
This ethnographic paper examines how various professionals working within sterilization camps in India engage with everyday ethics. While sterilization in India—and its place within India's population control programme historically entrenched in overtly and covertly coercive measures—gathers significant ethical concern in the scholarly and activist circles, extensive ethnographic engagement within sterilization camps in rural Rajasthan in 2012–2013 demonstrates that biomedical and bureaucratic personnel involved in the organisation of the camps are not preoccupied with dramatic ethical considerations during the majority of their time performing various duties in the camps. While they are not preoccupied with a question of ‘Is this ethical?’, they often do see their actions as fundamentally moral. This paper argues that while different ethical reasonings co-exist and clash within the camp, professionals working in sterilization camps view their work as ethical despite the controversial nature of sterilization in the country. Disgust plays a significant role in shaping the moral imperative surrounding sterilization: disgust felt by professionals towards sterilization patients, rooted in caste and class hierarchies, reinforces professionals' belief that they are engaged in humanitarian work by providing services to a population perceived as ‘backward.’ In the context of the impeding climate crisis and the proliferating discourses that return to the question of (over)population, it is important to understand the ethical worlds of professionals who carry out population control programmes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信