Marabelle N. Essandoh , Maria S. Mackroth , Thomas Theo Brehm , Pia Michelitsch , Franck Ekoka Mbassi , Maximilian Rakotonirinalalao , Kayode Ijagbemi , Michael Ramharter
{"title":"在德国汉堡,撒哈拉以南非洲“探亲访友”旅行者对疟疾风险的认知和有效预防的障碍","authors":"Marabelle N. Essandoh , Maria S. Mackroth , Thomas Theo Brehm , Pia Michelitsch , Franck Ekoka Mbassi , Maximilian Rakotonirinalalao , Kayode Ijagbemi , Michael Ramharter","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The African visiting friends and relatives (VFR) community in the Global North is at high risk of contracting preventable travel-associated infections including malaria when travelling to sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to assess barriers to effective prevention and to develop tailored travel counselling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire-based survey was conducted from January to August 2023 at the Hamburg Airport among adult sub-Saharan African VFR travellers returning from malaria-endemic destinations in Africa to assess malaria risk perceptions, attitudes towards prophylaxis and counselling and their experiences with travel medicine and malaria prophylaxis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 389 participants completed the survey. Of these, 67 % (n = 261) demonstrated adequate knowledge of malaria transmission. Fifty-one percent (n = 198) perceived minimal risk of contracting malaria in the malaria-endemic country leading to lower uptake of prophylaxis. Ten percent (n = 37) mistakenly believed they were vaccinated against malaria. Approximately half of the respondents did not seek medical travel advice prior to departure or take antimalarial prophylaxis due to perceived minimal risk of disease. Of those who took antimalarial drugs, 77 % (n = 149) completed the full course. On return, 5 % (n = 20) of the respondents had malaria-like symptoms and of these, 55 % (n = 11) either self-medicated or did not seek medical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VFR travellers mistakenly perceive a low risk of malaria, resulting in low uptake of travel medical advice and chemoprophylaxis. Mistrust of advice from healthcare providers was found. Insights from this survey are valuable for practitioners and travel medicine clinics to provide more tailored and culturally sensitive travel advice to VFR travellers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102858"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malaria risk perceptions and barriers for effective prophylaxis among sub-Saharan African 'visiting friends and relatives' travellers in Hamburg, Germany\",\"authors\":\"Marabelle N. Essandoh , Maria S. Mackroth , Thomas Theo Brehm , Pia Michelitsch , Franck Ekoka Mbassi , Maximilian Rakotonirinalalao , Kayode Ijagbemi , Michael Ramharter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The African visiting friends and relatives (VFR) community in the Global North is at high risk of contracting preventable travel-associated infections including malaria when travelling to sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to assess barriers to effective prevention and to develop tailored travel counselling.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire-based survey was conducted from January to August 2023 at the Hamburg Airport among adult sub-Saharan African VFR travellers returning from malaria-endemic destinations in Africa to assess malaria risk perceptions, attitudes towards prophylaxis and counselling and their experiences with travel medicine and malaria prophylaxis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 389 participants completed the survey. Of these, 67 % (n = 261) demonstrated adequate knowledge of malaria transmission. Fifty-one percent (n = 198) perceived minimal risk of contracting malaria in the malaria-endemic country leading to lower uptake of prophylaxis. Ten percent (n = 37) mistakenly believed they were vaccinated against malaria. Approximately half of the respondents did not seek medical travel advice prior to departure or take antimalarial prophylaxis due to perceived minimal risk of disease. Of those who took antimalarial drugs, 77 % (n = 149) completed the full course. On return, 5 % (n = 20) of the respondents had malaria-like symptoms and of these, 55 % (n = 11) either self-medicated or did not seek medical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VFR travellers mistakenly perceive a low risk of malaria, resulting in low uptake of travel medical advice and chemoprophylaxis. Mistrust of advice from healthcare providers was found. Insights from this survey are valuable for practitioners and travel medicine clinics to provide more tailored and culturally sensitive travel advice to VFR travellers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392500064X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392500064X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Malaria risk perceptions and barriers for effective prophylaxis among sub-Saharan African 'visiting friends and relatives' travellers in Hamburg, Germany
Background
The African visiting friends and relatives (VFR) community in the Global North is at high risk of contracting preventable travel-associated infections including malaria when travelling to sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to assess barriers to effective prevention and to develop tailored travel counselling.
Methods
A questionnaire-based survey was conducted from January to August 2023 at the Hamburg Airport among adult sub-Saharan African VFR travellers returning from malaria-endemic destinations in Africa to assess malaria risk perceptions, attitudes towards prophylaxis and counselling and their experiences with travel medicine and malaria prophylaxis.
Results
A total of 389 participants completed the survey. Of these, 67 % (n = 261) demonstrated adequate knowledge of malaria transmission. Fifty-one percent (n = 198) perceived minimal risk of contracting malaria in the malaria-endemic country leading to lower uptake of prophylaxis. Ten percent (n = 37) mistakenly believed they were vaccinated against malaria. Approximately half of the respondents did not seek medical travel advice prior to departure or take antimalarial prophylaxis due to perceived minimal risk of disease. Of those who took antimalarial drugs, 77 % (n = 149) completed the full course. On return, 5 % (n = 20) of the respondents had malaria-like symptoms and of these, 55 % (n = 11) either self-medicated or did not seek medical treatment.
Conclusions
VFR travellers mistakenly perceive a low risk of malaria, resulting in low uptake of travel medical advice and chemoprophylaxis. Mistrust of advice from healthcare providers was found. Insights from this survey are valuable for practitioners and travel medicine clinics to provide more tailored and culturally sensitive travel advice to VFR travellers.
期刊介绍:
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Publication Scope:
Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers
Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine
Focus Areas:
Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness
Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections
Malaria prevention and treatment
Travellers' diarrhoea
Infections associated with mass gatherings
Migration-related infections
Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease
Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control
Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners
Coverage:
Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine
Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease
Publication Features:
Offers a fast peer-review process
Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts
Aims to publish cutting-edge papers