破骨细胞在异位和正位环境中驱动骨形成

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Yang Zhang , Taozhao Yu , Qianfeng Xiang , Femke van den Tillaart , Jinling Ma , Zhumei Zhuang , Talita Stessuk , Huanan Wang , Jeroen J.J.P. van den Beucken
{"title":"破骨细胞在异位和正位环境中驱动骨形成","authors":"Yang Zhang ,&nbsp;Taozhao Yu ,&nbsp;Qianfeng Xiang ,&nbsp;Femke van den Tillaart ,&nbsp;Jinling Ma ,&nbsp;Zhumei Zhuang ,&nbsp;Talita Stessuk ,&nbsp;Huanan Wang ,&nbsp;Jeroen J.J.P. van den Beucken","doi":"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To date, cell-based approaches to stimulate bone formation have primarily focused on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for their supposed osteogenic potential, but despite some pre-clinical successes, clinical outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. Emerging data suggest that osteoclasts play crucial roles in stimulating bone formation beyond their catabolic function in bone resorption. Interestingly, osteoclastic activity precedes osteoblastic bone formation in the physiological bone remodeling cycle. To explore the role of osteoclasts in bone formation further, we prepared osteoclast-based constructs and implanted them (i) ectopically to evaluate their potential to induce bone formation, and (ii) orthotopically to evaluate effects on bone regeneration. Remarkably, constructs containing primary mouse osteoclasts showed consistent and robust <em>de novo</em> bone formation, which presented comparable osteogenic efficacy to BMP-2 treatment. Additionally, we observed <em>de novo</em> bone marrow formation upon ectopic implantation of osteoclast-based constructs (incidence 73 %) and BMP-2 loaded controls (incidence 91 %). Importantly, constructs containing macrophages (MФs) or scaffold only (negative control) showed neither bone nor bone marrow formation. Further, a mouse cranial defect model confirmed the stimulatory bone regeneration capabilities of Osteoclast-based constructs, evidenced by 2.5-fold increased bone formation compared to scaffold only. These findings demonstrate the osteoinduction and osteogenesis capacity of osteoclasts, reshaping our understanding of their role in bone formation and opening new avenues for the design and development of cell-based constructs for bone repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":254,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 123377"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoclasts drive bone formation in ectopic and orthotopic environments\",\"authors\":\"Yang Zhang ,&nbsp;Taozhao Yu ,&nbsp;Qianfeng Xiang ,&nbsp;Femke van den Tillaart ,&nbsp;Jinling Ma ,&nbsp;Zhumei Zhuang ,&nbsp;Talita Stessuk ,&nbsp;Huanan Wang ,&nbsp;Jeroen J.J.P. van den Beucken\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To date, cell-based approaches to stimulate bone formation have primarily focused on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for their supposed osteogenic potential, but despite some pre-clinical successes, clinical outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. Emerging data suggest that osteoclasts play crucial roles in stimulating bone formation beyond their catabolic function in bone resorption. Interestingly, osteoclastic activity precedes osteoblastic bone formation in the physiological bone remodeling cycle. To explore the role of osteoclasts in bone formation further, we prepared osteoclast-based constructs and implanted them (i) ectopically to evaluate their potential to induce bone formation, and (ii) orthotopically to evaluate effects on bone regeneration. Remarkably, constructs containing primary mouse osteoclasts showed consistent and robust <em>de novo</em> bone formation, which presented comparable osteogenic efficacy to BMP-2 treatment. Additionally, we observed <em>de novo</em> bone marrow formation upon ectopic implantation of osteoclast-based constructs (incidence 73 %) and BMP-2 loaded controls (incidence 91 %). Importantly, constructs containing macrophages (MФs) or scaffold only (negative control) showed neither bone nor bone marrow formation. Further, a mouse cranial defect model confirmed the stimulatory bone regeneration capabilities of Osteoclast-based constructs, evidenced by 2.5-fold increased bone formation compared to scaffold only. These findings demonstrate the osteoinduction and osteogenesis capacity of osteoclasts, reshaping our understanding of their role in bone formation and opening new avenues for the design and development of cell-based constructs for bone repair.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"322 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961225002960\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961225002960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迄今为止,以细胞为基础的刺激骨形成的方法主要集中在间充质基质细胞(MSCs)上,因为它们具有所谓的成骨潜力,但是尽管取得了一些临床前的成功,临床结果仍然不令人满意。新出现的数据表明,破骨细胞在骨吸收中的分解代谢功能之外,在刺激骨形成方面起着至关重要的作用。有趣的是,在生理性骨重塑周期中,破骨细胞活性先于成骨细胞骨形成。为了进一步探索破骨细胞在骨形成中的作用,我们制备了基于破骨细胞的构建体,并将其植入(i)异位以评估其诱导骨形成的潜力,(ii)正位以评估其对骨再生的影响。值得注意的是,含有原代小鼠破骨细胞的构建物显示出一致且强大的新生骨形成,其成骨效果与BMP-2治疗相当。此外,我们观察到异位植入破骨细胞构建体(发生率为73%)和BMP-2负载对照组(发生率为91%)的新生骨髓形成。重要的是,含有巨噬细胞的构建物(MФs)或仅含有支架的构建物(阴性对照)既没有骨形成,也没有骨髓形成。此外,小鼠颅骨缺损模型证实了基于破骨细胞的结构具有刺激骨再生的能力,与仅支架相比,骨形成增加了2.5倍。这些发现证明了破骨细胞的成骨诱导和成骨能力,重塑了我们对破骨细胞在骨形成中的作用的理解,并为设计和开发基于细胞的骨修复结构开辟了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteoclasts drive bone formation in ectopic and orthotopic environments
To date, cell-based approaches to stimulate bone formation have primarily focused on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for their supposed osteogenic potential, but despite some pre-clinical successes, clinical outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. Emerging data suggest that osteoclasts play crucial roles in stimulating bone formation beyond their catabolic function in bone resorption. Interestingly, osteoclastic activity precedes osteoblastic bone formation in the physiological bone remodeling cycle. To explore the role of osteoclasts in bone formation further, we prepared osteoclast-based constructs and implanted them (i) ectopically to evaluate their potential to induce bone formation, and (ii) orthotopically to evaluate effects on bone regeneration. Remarkably, constructs containing primary mouse osteoclasts showed consistent and robust de novo bone formation, which presented comparable osteogenic efficacy to BMP-2 treatment. Additionally, we observed de novo bone marrow formation upon ectopic implantation of osteoclast-based constructs (incidence 73 %) and BMP-2 loaded controls (incidence 91 %). Importantly, constructs containing macrophages (MФs) or scaffold only (negative control) showed neither bone nor bone marrow formation. Further, a mouse cranial defect model confirmed the stimulatory bone regeneration capabilities of Osteoclast-based constructs, evidenced by 2.5-fold increased bone formation compared to scaffold only. These findings demonstrate the osteoinduction and osteogenesis capacity of osteoclasts, reshaping our understanding of their role in bone formation and opening new avenues for the design and development of cell-based constructs for bone repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomaterials
Biomaterials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
26.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
565
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Biomaterials is an international journal covering the science and clinical application of biomaterials. A biomaterial is now defined as a substance that has been engineered to take a form which, alone or as part of a complex system, is used to direct, by control of interactions with components of living systems, the course of any therapeutic or diagnostic procedure. It is the aim of the journal to provide a peer-reviewed forum for the publication of original papers and authoritative review and opinion papers dealing with the most important issues facing the use of biomaterials in clinical practice. The scope of the journal covers the wide range of physical, biological and chemical sciences that underpin the design of biomaterials and the clinical disciplines in which they are used. These sciences include polymer synthesis and characterization, drug and gene vector design, the biology of the host response, immunology and toxicology and self assembly at the nanoscale. Clinical applications include the therapies of medical technology and regenerative medicine in all clinical disciplines, and diagnostic systems that reply on innovative contrast and sensing agents. The journal is relevant to areas such as cancer diagnosis and therapy, implantable devices, drug delivery systems, gene vectors, bionanotechnology and tissue engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信