Yang Zhang , Taozhao Yu , Qianfeng Xiang , Femke van den Tillaart , Jinling Ma , Zhumei Zhuang , Talita Stessuk , Huanan Wang , Jeroen J.J.P. van den Beucken
{"title":"破骨细胞在异位和正位环境中驱动骨形成","authors":"Yang Zhang , Taozhao Yu , Qianfeng Xiang , Femke van den Tillaart , Jinling Ma , Zhumei Zhuang , Talita Stessuk , Huanan Wang , Jeroen J.J.P. van den Beucken","doi":"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To date, cell-based approaches to stimulate bone formation have primarily focused on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for their supposed osteogenic potential, but despite some pre-clinical successes, clinical outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. Emerging data suggest that osteoclasts play crucial roles in stimulating bone formation beyond their catabolic function in bone resorption. Interestingly, osteoclastic activity precedes osteoblastic bone formation in the physiological bone remodeling cycle. To explore the role of osteoclasts in bone formation further, we prepared osteoclast-based constructs and implanted them (i) ectopically to evaluate their potential to induce bone formation, and (ii) orthotopically to evaluate effects on bone regeneration. Remarkably, constructs containing primary mouse osteoclasts showed consistent and robust <em>de novo</em> bone formation, which presented comparable osteogenic efficacy to BMP-2 treatment. Additionally, we observed <em>de novo</em> bone marrow formation upon ectopic implantation of osteoclast-based constructs (incidence 73 %) and BMP-2 loaded controls (incidence 91 %). Importantly, constructs containing macrophages (MФs) or scaffold only (negative control) showed neither bone nor bone marrow formation. Further, a mouse cranial defect model confirmed the stimulatory bone regeneration capabilities of Osteoclast-based constructs, evidenced by 2.5-fold increased bone formation compared to scaffold only. These findings demonstrate the osteoinduction and osteogenesis capacity of osteoclasts, reshaping our understanding of their role in bone formation and opening new avenues for the design and development of cell-based constructs for bone repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":254,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials","volume":"322 ","pages":"Article 123377"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoclasts drive bone formation in ectopic and orthotopic environments\",\"authors\":\"Yang Zhang , Taozhao Yu , Qianfeng Xiang , Femke van den Tillaart , Jinling Ma , Zhumei Zhuang , Talita Stessuk , Huanan Wang , Jeroen J.J.P. van den Beucken\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To date, cell-based approaches to stimulate bone formation have primarily focused on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for their supposed osteogenic potential, but despite some pre-clinical successes, clinical outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. Emerging data suggest that osteoclasts play crucial roles in stimulating bone formation beyond their catabolic function in bone resorption. Interestingly, osteoclastic activity precedes osteoblastic bone formation in the physiological bone remodeling cycle. To explore the role of osteoclasts in bone formation further, we prepared osteoclast-based constructs and implanted them (i) ectopically to evaluate their potential to induce bone formation, and (ii) orthotopically to evaluate effects on bone regeneration. Remarkably, constructs containing primary mouse osteoclasts showed consistent and robust <em>de novo</em> bone formation, which presented comparable osteogenic efficacy to BMP-2 treatment. Additionally, we observed <em>de novo</em> bone marrow formation upon ectopic implantation of osteoclast-based constructs (incidence 73 %) and BMP-2 loaded controls (incidence 91 %). Importantly, constructs containing macrophages (MФs) or scaffold only (negative control) showed neither bone nor bone marrow formation. Further, a mouse cranial defect model confirmed the stimulatory bone regeneration capabilities of Osteoclast-based constructs, evidenced by 2.5-fold increased bone formation compared to scaffold only. These findings demonstrate the osteoinduction and osteogenesis capacity of osteoclasts, reshaping our understanding of their role in bone formation and opening new avenues for the design and development of cell-based constructs for bone repair.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"322 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961225002960\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961225002960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Osteoclasts drive bone formation in ectopic and orthotopic environments
To date, cell-based approaches to stimulate bone formation have primarily focused on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for their supposed osteogenic potential, but despite some pre-clinical successes, clinical outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. Emerging data suggest that osteoclasts play crucial roles in stimulating bone formation beyond their catabolic function in bone resorption. Interestingly, osteoclastic activity precedes osteoblastic bone formation in the physiological bone remodeling cycle. To explore the role of osteoclasts in bone formation further, we prepared osteoclast-based constructs and implanted them (i) ectopically to evaluate their potential to induce bone formation, and (ii) orthotopically to evaluate effects on bone regeneration. Remarkably, constructs containing primary mouse osteoclasts showed consistent and robust de novo bone formation, which presented comparable osteogenic efficacy to BMP-2 treatment. Additionally, we observed de novo bone marrow formation upon ectopic implantation of osteoclast-based constructs (incidence 73 %) and BMP-2 loaded controls (incidence 91 %). Importantly, constructs containing macrophages (MФs) or scaffold only (negative control) showed neither bone nor bone marrow formation. Further, a mouse cranial defect model confirmed the stimulatory bone regeneration capabilities of Osteoclast-based constructs, evidenced by 2.5-fold increased bone formation compared to scaffold only. These findings demonstrate the osteoinduction and osteogenesis capacity of osteoclasts, reshaping our understanding of their role in bone formation and opening new avenues for the design and development of cell-based constructs for bone repair.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials is an international journal covering the science and clinical application of biomaterials. A biomaterial is now defined as a substance that has been engineered to take a form which, alone or as part of a complex system, is used to direct, by control of interactions with components of living systems, the course of any therapeutic or diagnostic procedure. It is the aim of the journal to provide a peer-reviewed forum for the publication of original papers and authoritative review and opinion papers dealing with the most important issues facing the use of biomaterials in clinical practice. The scope of the journal covers the wide range of physical, biological and chemical sciences that underpin the design of biomaterials and the clinical disciplines in which they are used. These sciences include polymer synthesis and characterization, drug and gene vector design, the biology of the host response, immunology and toxicology and self assembly at the nanoscale. Clinical applications include the therapies of medical technology and regenerative medicine in all clinical disciplines, and diagnostic systems that reply on innovative contrast and sensing agents. The journal is relevant to areas such as cancer diagnosis and therapy, implantable devices, drug delivery systems, gene vectors, bionanotechnology and tissue engineering.