Mario Beilmann, Karissa Adkins, Harrie C. M. Boonen, Philip Hewitt, Wenyue Hu, Robert Mader, Susanne Moore, Payal Rana, Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Remi Villenave, Terry van Vleet
{"title":"新方法方法在候选药物非临床安全性评估中的应用","authors":"Mario Beilmann, Karissa Adkins, Harrie C. M. Boonen, Philip Hewitt, Wenyue Hu, Robert Mader, Susanne Moore, Payal Rana, Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Remi Villenave, Terry van Vleet","doi":"10.1038/s41573-025-01182-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and advances with in vitro testing systems have prompted revisions in regulatory guidelines and inspired dedicated in vitro/ex vivo studies for nonclinical safety assessment. This Review by a safety reflection initiative subgroup of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)/Preclinical Development Expert Group (PDEG) summarizes the current state and potential application of in vitro studies using human-derived material for safety assessment in drug development. It focuses on case studies from recent projects in which animal models alone proved to be limited or inadequate for safety testing. It further highlights four categories of drug candidates for which alternative in vitro approaches are applicable and discusses progress in using in vitro testing solutions for safety assessment in these categories. Finally, the article highlights new risk assessment strategies, initiatives and consortia promoting the advancement of NAMs. This collective work is meant to encourage the use of NAMs for more human-relevant safety assessment, which should ultimately result in reduced animal testing for drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":18847,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Drug Discovery","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of new approach methodologies for nonclinical safety assessment of drug candidates\",\"authors\":\"Mario Beilmann, Karissa Adkins, Harrie C. M. Boonen, Philip Hewitt, Wenyue Hu, Robert Mader, Susanne Moore, Payal Rana, Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Remi Villenave, Terry van Vleet\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41573-025-01182-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and advances with in vitro testing systems have prompted revisions in regulatory guidelines and inspired dedicated in vitro/ex vivo studies for nonclinical safety assessment. This Review by a safety reflection initiative subgroup of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)/Preclinical Development Expert Group (PDEG) summarizes the current state and potential application of in vitro studies using human-derived material for safety assessment in drug development. It focuses on case studies from recent projects in which animal models alone proved to be limited or inadequate for safety testing. It further highlights four categories of drug candidates for which alternative in vitro approaches are applicable and discusses progress in using in vitro testing solutions for safety assessment in these categories. Finally, the article highlights new risk assessment strategies, initiatives and consortia promoting the advancement of NAMs. This collective work is meant to encourage the use of NAMs for more human-relevant safety assessment, which should ultimately result in reduced animal testing for drug development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Drug Discovery\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Drug Discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-025-01182-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-025-01182-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of new approach methodologies for nonclinical safety assessment of drug candidates
The development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and advances with in vitro testing systems have prompted revisions in regulatory guidelines and inspired dedicated in vitro/ex vivo studies for nonclinical safety assessment. This Review by a safety reflection initiative subgroup of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)/Preclinical Development Expert Group (PDEG) summarizes the current state and potential application of in vitro studies using human-derived material for safety assessment in drug development. It focuses on case studies from recent projects in which animal models alone proved to be limited or inadequate for safety testing. It further highlights four categories of drug candidates for which alternative in vitro approaches are applicable and discusses progress in using in vitro testing solutions for safety assessment in these categories. Finally, the article highlights new risk assessment strategies, initiatives and consortia promoting the advancement of NAMs. This collective work is meant to encourage the use of NAMs for more human-relevant safety assessment, which should ultimately result in reduced animal testing for drug development.