Isabel Pol Segura, Peter A. Jensen, Kiranmai Sanagavarapu, Wilson R. Leal da Silva
{"title":"解锁粘土的潜力:活化技术在SCMs中增强反应性的比较分析","authors":"Isabel Pol Segura, Peter A. Jensen, Kiranmai Sanagavarapu, Wilson R. Leal da Silva","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02663-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clays’ reactivity can be improved through different treatments that transform their crystalline structure into an amorphous state. This study compares thermal, mechanical, and chemical activation on three laboratory grade clays (kaolinite, halloysite and montmorillonite), investigating changes in particle morphology, composition, and evaluating their reactivity as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in composite cement through compressive strength tests. Across all activation methods, harsher conditions (higher temperatures, grinding times or acid contents) resulted in larger particle sizes and lower specific surface areas, reducing the clays’ degree of mineral amorphization and pozzolanic activity. All activated clays were tested with a 20% replacement of CEM I, a water-to-binder ratio of 0.5, and compared against a baseline of 100% CEM I mortar. Our findings indicate that thermal activation, particularly at 750 °C, is most effective for kaolinites and halloysites, resulting in an average 28-day compressive strength increase of 40% and 30%, respectively. For montmorillonite, mechanical activation with a ball-to-powder ratio of 10 and a duration of 75 min works best, yielding a 23% increase in the 28-day strength. While chemical activation of montmorillonite led to a 15% 28-day strength gain, thermal activation had no significant impact on its performance compared to 100% CEM I baseline. However, challenges related to the scalability and safety of chemical activation hinder its industrial application. Overall, this study provides new insights into optimizing activation methods based on clay mineralogy to improve strength performance as SCMs in composite cement, while promoting the utilization of clays that are currently deemed unsuitable for composite cement production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking clay’s potential: a comparative analysis of activation techniques for enhanced reactivity in SCMs\",\"authors\":\"Isabel Pol Segura, Peter A. Jensen, Kiranmai Sanagavarapu, Wilson R. Leal da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1617/s11527-025-02663-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Clays’ reactivity can be improved through different treatments that transform their crystalline structure into an amorphous state. This study compares thermal, mechanical, and chemical activation on three laboratory grade clays (kaolinite, halloysite and montmorillonite), investigating changes in particle morphology, composition, and evaluating their reactivity as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in composite cement through compressive strength tests. Across all activation methods, harsher conditions (higher temperatures, grinding times or acid contents) resulted in larger particle sizes and lower specific surface areas, reducing the clays’ degree of mineral amorphization and pozzolanic activity. All activated clays were tested with a 20% replacement of CEM I, a water-to-binder ratio of 0.5, and compared against a baseline of 100% CEM I mortar. Our findings indicate that thermal activation, particularly at 750 °C, is most effective for kaolinites and halloysites, resulting in an average 28-day compressive strength increase of 40% and 30%, respectively. For montmorillonite, mechanical activation with a ball-to-powder ratio of 10 and a duration of 75 min works best, yielding a 23% increase in the 28-day strength. While chemical activation of montmorillonite led to a 15% 28-day strength gain, thermal activation had no significant impact on its performance compared to 100% CEM I baseline. However, challenges related to the scalability and safety of chemical activation hinder its industrial application. Overall, this study provides new insights into optimizing activation methods based on clay mineralogy to improve strength performance as SCMs in composite cement, while promoting the utilization of clays that are currently deemed unsuitable for composite cement production.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02663-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02663-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
粘土的反应性可以通过不同的处理将其晶体结构转变为无定形状态来提高。本研究比较了三种实验室级粘土(高岭土、高岭土和蒙脱土)的热、力学和化学活化,研究了颗粒形态、组成的变化,并通过抗压强度测试评估了它们作为复合水泥中补充胶凝材料(SCMs)的反应性。在所有的活化方法中,更恶劣的条件(更高的温度、研磨时间或酸含量)会导致更大的颗粒尺寸和更低的比表面积,从而降低粘土的矿物非晶化程度和火山灰活性。所有的活性粘土都用20%的CEM I替代,水胶比为0.5,并与100% CEM I砂浆的基线进行比较。我们的研究结果表明,热活化,特别是在750°C时,对高岭石和高岭土最有效,导致平均28天的抗压强度分别提高40%和30%。对于蒙脱土,球粉比为10、持续时间为75分钟的机械活化效果最好,28天强度提高23%。虽然蒙脱土的化学活化使其28天的强度增加了15%,但与100%的CEM I基线相比,热活化对其性能没有显著影响。然而,与化学活化的可扩展性和安全性相关的挑战阻碍了其工业应用。总的来说,该研究为优化基于粘土矿物学的活化方法提供了新的见解,以提高复合水泥中作为SCMs的强度性能,同时促进了目前被认为不适合复合水泥生产的粘土的利用。
Unlocking clay’s potential: a comparative analysis of activation techniques for enhanced reactivity in SCMs
Clays’ reactivity can be improved through different treatments that transform their crystalline structure into an amorphous state. This study compares thermal, mechanical, and chemical activation on three laboratory grade clays (kaolinite, halloysite and montmorillonite), investigating changes in particle morphology, composition, and evaluating their reactivity as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in composite cement through compressive strength tests. Across all activation methods, harsher conditions (higher temperatures, grinding times or acid contents) resulted in larger particle sizes and lower specific surface areas, reducing the clays’ degree of mineral amorphization and pozzolanic activity. All activated clays were tested with a 20% replacement of CEM I, a water-to-binder ratio of 0.5, and compared against a baseline of 100% CEM I mortar. Our findings indicate that thermal activation, particularly at 750 °C, is most effective for kaolinites and halloysites, resulting in an average 28-day compressive strength increase of 40% and 30%, respectively. For montmorillonite, mechanical activation with a ball-to-powder ratio of 10 and a duration of 75 min works best, yielding a 23% increase in the 28-day strength. While chemical activation of montmorillonite led to a 15% 28-day strength gain, thermal activation had no significant impact on its performance compared to 100% CEM I baseline. However, challenges related to the scalability and safety of chemical activation hinder its industrial application. Overall, this study provides new insights into optimizing activation methods based on clay mineralogy to improve strength performance as SCMs in composite cement, while promoting the utilization of clays that are currently deemed unsuitable for composite cement production.
期刊介绍:
Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.