两种浮选转向架轨道对静垂直土应力分布的影响

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Lorenz Breinig, Henrik Brokmeier, Dirk Jaeger
{"title":"两种浮选转向架轨道对静垂直土应力分布的影响","authors":"Lorenz Breinig,&nbsp;Henrik Brokmeier,&nbsp;Dirk Jaeger","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flotation bogie tracks are widely used to mitigate soil deformation when operating wheeled forest machines on soils with low bearing capacity. While all of these tracks have flat and wide cross members in common, there is considerable variety in cross-member shape. For two common types of flotation bogie tracks with similar basic dimensions but different geometry of the cross members, the distribution of static vertical soil stress was measured using foil sensors installed under a homogenous sand layer. Vertical stress distributions were captured for both track types and for bare tires as a reference, with three levels of static wheel loads tested in combination with three levels of tire inflation pressure. Both track types significantly reduced mean vertical stress by significantly increasing the stress-transferring area. The track type with completely flat cross members had a greater effect than the type having cross members with recessed lateral ends, and it was also more effective in reducing peak stress. While these observations under standardized and static conditions cannot be directly transferred to the conditions of real forest operations, they suggest that the efficacy of bogie tracks to reduce soil deformation largely depends on the proper choice of track type with regard to cross-member design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"252 ","pages":"Article 106632"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of two types of flotation bogie tracks on the distribution of static vertical soil stress\",\"authors\":\"Lorenz Breinig,&nbsp;Henrik Brokmeier,&nbsp;Dirk Jaeger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Flotation bogie tracks are widely used to mitigate soil deformation when operating wheeled forest machines on soils with low bearing capacity. While all of these tracks have flat and wide cross members in common, there is considerable variety in cross-member shape. For two common types of flotation bogie tracks with similar basic dimensions but different geometry of the cross members, the distribution of static vertical soil stress was measured using foil sensors installed under a homogenous sand layer. Vertical stress distributions were captured for both track types and for bare tires as a reference, with three levels of static wheel loads tested in combination with three levels of tire inflation pressure. Both track types significantly reduced mean vertical stress by significantly increasing the stress-transferring area. The track type with completely flat cross members had a greater effect than the type having cross members with recessed lateral ends, and it was also more effective in reducing peak stress. While these observations under standardized and static conditions cannot be directly transferred to the conditions of real forest operations, they suggest that the efficacy of bogie tracks to reduce soil deformation largely depends on the proper choice of track type with regard to cross-member design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"252 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725001862\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725001862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

浮选转向架轨道是轮式林业机械在低承载能力土壤上作业时,为减轻土壤变形而广泛采用的一种方法。虽然所有这些轨道有平坦和宽的交叉成员共同,有相当多的品种在交叉成员的形状。针对两种常见的基本尺寸相似但交叉构件几何形状不同的浮选转向架轨道,采用安装在均质砂层下的金属片传感器测量了轨道的静垂直土应力分布。在三个水平的车轮静态载荷和三个水平的轮胎充气压力下,作为参考,我们捕获了轨道类型和裸轮胎的垂直应力分布。两种轨迹均通过显著增加应力传递面积而显著降低平均垂直应力。具有完全扁平交叉构件的轨道型比具有侧端凹陷交叉构件的轨道型效果更大,并且在降低峰值应力方面也更有效。虽然这些在标准化和静态条件下的观察结果不能直接转移到实际森林作业的条件下,但它们表明,转向架轨道减少土壤变形的效力在很大程度上取决于在交叉构件设计方面正确选择轨道类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of two types of flotation bogie tracks on the distribution of static vertical soil stress
Flotation bogie tracks are widely used to mitigate soil deformation when operating wheeled forest machines on soils with low bearing capacity. While all of these tracks have flat and wide cross members in common, there is considerable variety in cross-member shape. For two common types of flotation bogie tracks with similar basic dimensions but different geometry of the cross members, the distribution of static vertical soil stress was measured using foil sensors installed under a homogenous sand layer. Vertical stress distributions were captured for both track types and for bare tires as a reference, with three levels of static wheel loads tested in combination with three levels of tire inflation pressure. Both track types significantly reduced mean vertical stress by significantly increasing the stress-transferring area. The track type with completely flat cross members had a greater effect than the type having cross members with recessed lateral ends, and it was also more effective in reducing peak stress. While these observations under standardized and static conditions cannot be directly transferred to the conditions of real forest operations, they suggest that the efficacy of bogie tracks to reduce soil deformation largely depends on the proper choice of track type with regard to cross-member design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信