总统制与议会制:政治制度与股市波动

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Yosef Bonaparte
{"title":"总统制与议会制:政治制度与股市波动","authors":"Yosef Bonaparte","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We utilize panel data from 60 countries to analyze whether the political system -presidential versus parliamentary-impacts stock market volatility. Our findings show that presidential systems exhibit lower volatility compared to parliamentary systems. We identify two main factors underlying this result: political stability and coalition dependence. Specifically, presidential systems demonstrate greater political stability and less coalition dependence, which contribute to reduced stock market volatility. Additionally, we show that the lower stock market volatility in presidential systems does not come at the cost of stock market performance. In fact, some evidence suggests that presidential systems positively enhance stock market performance. Our results are statistically significant and robust, accounting for subsamples and employing various specifications and econometric models, including a global portfolio that establishes each country's Beta. Collectively, our study highlights the significant role of political systems in the study of law and finance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51439,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Economy","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 102674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presidential versus parliamentary: Political system and stock market volatility\",\"authors\":\"Yosef Bonaparte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2025.102674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We utilize panel data from 60 countries to analyze whether the political system -presidential versus parliamentary-impacts stock market volatility. Our findings show that presidential systems exhibit lower volatility compared to parliamentary systems. We identify two main factors underlying this result: political stability and coalition dependence. Specifically, presidential systems demonstrate greater political stability and less coalition dependence, which contribute to reduced stock market volatility. Additionally, we show that the lower stock market volatility in presidential systems does not come at the cost of stock market performance. In fact, some evidence suggests that presidential systems positively enhance stock market performance. Our results are statistically significant and robust, accounting for subsamples and employing various specifications and econometric models, including a global portfolio that establishes each country's Beta. Collectively, our study highlights the significant role of political systems in the study of law and finance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268025000345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176268025000345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用来自60个国家的面板数据来分析政治制度-总统制与议会制-是否影响股市波动。我们的研究结果表明,与议会制相比,总统制表现出更低的波动性。我们确定了导致这一结果的两个主要因素:政治稳定和对联盟的依赖。具体而言,总统制表现出更大的政治稳定性和更少的联盟依赖,这有助于减少股市波动。此外,我们表明,在总统制下,较低的股市波动性并不是以股市表现为代价的。事实上,一些证据表明,总统制对股市表现有积极的促进作用。我们的结果在统计上具有显著性和稳健性,考虑了子样本并采用了各种规格和计量经济模型,包括建立每个国家Beta的全球投资组合。总的来说,我们的研究突出了政治制度在法律和金融研究中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presidential versus parliamentary: Political system and stock market volatility
We utilize panel data from 60 countries to analyze whether the political system -presidential versus parliamentary-impacts stock market volatility. Our findings show that presidential systems exhibit lower volatility compared to parliamentary systems. We identify two main factors underlying this result: political stability and coalition dependence. Specifically, presidential systems demonstrate greater political stability and less coalition dependence, which contribute to reduced stock market volatility. Additionally, we show that the lower stock market volatility in presidential systems does not come at the cost of stock market performance. In fact, some evidence suggests that presidential systems positively enhance stock market performance. Our results are statistically significant and robust, accounting for subsamples and employing various specifications and econometric models, including a global portfolio that establishes each country's Beta. Collectively, our study highlights the significant role of political systems in the study of law and finance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Political Economy is to disseminate original theoretical and empirical research on economic phenomena within a scope that encompasses collective decision making, political behavior, and the role of institutions. Contributions are invited from the international community of researchers. Manuscripts must be published in English. Starting 2008, the European Journal of Political Economy is indexed in the Social Sciences Citation Index published by Thomson Scientific (formerly ISI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信