Zunqing Liu , Jingwei Gong , Haojie Ji , Xiaoling Zhong , Jun Dong , Haiwei Xie
{"title":"镁渣基填料性能及水化产物分析","authors":"Zunqing Liu , Jingwei Gong , Haojie Ji , Xiaoling Zhong , Jun Dong , Haiwei Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the properties and hydration products of filling materials based on modified magnesium slag (MMS) and unmodified magnesium slag (UMS). Two types of MMS (MMS-A and MMS-B) were compared with UMS through various analyses. X-ray diffraction revealed that MMS predominantly contained β-C<sub>2</sub>S, while UMS was dominated by γ-C<sub>2</sub>S. Strength activity index tests showed superior performance of MMS, with MMS-A and MMS-B achieving 97.53 % and 89.46 % at 3 days, respectively, compared to 68.5 % for UMS. Isothermal calorimetry demonstrated that MMS-based pastes had shorter induction periods and higher heat release rates, with MMS-A reaching a peak of 0.470 mW/g at 30 hours, while UMS peaked at 0.203 mW/g at 66 hours. Compressive strength tests at 28 days yielded 8.39 MPa for MMS-A, 8.08 MPa for MMS-B, and 4.99 MPa for UMS-based pastes. Microstructural analyses, including SEM, TG-DTG, and FT-IR, confirmed denser C-S-H formation and more refined pore structures in MMS-based pastes. The minimal differences between MMS-A and MMS-B across all tests demonstrated the stability of the modification process. These findings suggest that MMS offers a promising alternative for sustainable filling materials in mining applications, effectively valorizing an industrial by-product while potentially improving backfill performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"126 ","pages":"Pages 408-417"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Properties and hydration products analysis of magnesium slag-based filling materials\",\"authors\":\"Zunqing Liu , Jingwei Gong , Haojie Ji , Xiaoling Zhong , Jun Dong , Haiwei Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the properties and hydration products of filling materials based on modified magnesium slag (MMS) and unmodified magnesium slag (UMS). Two types of MMS (MMS-A and MMS-B) were compared with UMS through various analyses. X-ray diffraction revealed that MMS predominantly contained β-C<sub>2</sub>S, while UMS was dominated by γ-C<sub>2</sub>S. Strength activity index tests showed superior performance of MMS, with MMS-A and MMS-B achieving 97.53 % and 89.46 % at 3 days, respectively, compared to 68.5 % for UMS. Isothermal calorimetry demonstrated that MMS-based pastes had shorter induction periods and higher heat release rates, with MMS-A reaching a peak of 0.470 mW/g at 30 hours, while UMS peaked at 0.203 mW/g at 66 hours. Compressive strength tests at 28 days yielded 8.39 MPa for MMS-A, 8.08 MPa for MMS-B, and 4.99 MPa for UMS-based pastes. Microstructural analyses, including SEM, TG-DTG, and FT-IR, confirmed denser C-S-H formation and more refined pore structures in MMS-based pastes. The minimal differences between MMS-A and MMS-B across all tests demonstrated the stability of the modification process. These findings suggest that MMS offers a promising alternative for sustainable filling materials in mining applications, effectively valorizing an industrial by-product while potentially improving backfill performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 408-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111001682500609X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111001682500609X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Properties and hydration products analysis of magnesium slag-based filling materials
This study investigates the properties and hydration products of filling materials based on modified magnesium slag (MMS) and unmodified magnesium slag (UMS). Two types of MMS (MMS-A and MMS-B) were compared with UMS through various analyses. X-ray diffraction revealed that MMS predominantly contained β-C2S, while UMS was dominated by γ-C2S. Strength activity index tests showed superior performance of MMS, with MMS-A and MMS-B achieving 97.53 % and 89.46 % at 3 days, respectively, compared to 68.5 % for UMS. Isothermal calorimetry demonstrated that MMS-based pastes had shorter induction periods and higher heat release rates, with MMS-A reaching a peak of 0.470 mW/g at 30 hours, while UMS peaked at 0.203 mW/g at 66 hours. Compressive strength tests at 28 days yielded 8.39 MPa for MMS-A, 8.08 MPa for MMS-B, and 4.99 MPa for UMS-based pastes. Microstructural analyses, including SEM, TG-DTG, and FT-IR, confirmed denser C-S-H formation and more refined pore structures in MMS-based pastes. The minimal differences between MMS-A and MMS-B across all tests demonstrated the stability of the modification process. These findings suggest that MMS offers a promising alternative for sustainable filling materials in mining applications, effectively valorizing an industrial by-product while potentially improving backfill performance.
期刊介绍:
Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification:
• Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering
• Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering
• Civil and Architecture Engineering
• Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences
• Environmental Engineering