{"title":"探究高德语和低德语互动对话中新闻标记和状态变化标记之间的模糊界限——一个变分语用和互动的视角","authors":"Kathrin Weber , Katharina König","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By adopting the approaches of variational pragmatics and interactional analysis, this paper presents a comparative analysis of ‘newsmarks’ as token-based responses, registering a prior turn as new information in mundane conversation in two different varieties of one language, namely North-West High German (NHG), a regional near-standard variety, and the Westphalian Low German dialect variety (LoG). It aims to illustrate how a variational perspective can further our understanding of analytic concepts that are largely based on single-language studies. In particular, we address the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens (CoSTs). Based on a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis, we show that NHG and LoG differ in the formats routinely used for marking a prior as news. Moreover, our study reveals that while in NHG newsmarks and CoSTs tend to be lexically specialized resources, speakers of LoG routinely deploy polyfunctional resources such as the CoST <em>achso</em> as newsmarks. In addition, we discuss the role of prosody as a contextualization cue in the use of <em>achso</em> as a polyfunctional token. In sum, this paper sheds new light on the continuum between newsmarks and CoSTs in talk-in-interaction and contributes to our understanding of these indexes in comparative variational pragmatics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 93-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens in High German and Low German talk-in-interaction – A variational-pragmatic and interactional perspective\",\"authors\":\"Kathrin Weber , Katharina König\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>By adopting the approaches of variational pragmatics and interactional analysis, this paper presents a comparative analysis of ‘newsmarks’ as token-based responses, registering a prior turn as new information in mundane conversation in two different varieties of one language, namely North-West High German (NHG), a regional near-standard variety, and the Westphalian Low German dialect variety (LoG). It aims to illustrate how a variational perspective can further our understanding of analytic concepts that are largely based on single-language studies. In particular, we address the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens (CoSTs). Based on a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis, we show that NHG and LoG differ in the formats routinely used for marking a prior as news. Moreover, our study reveals that while in NHG newsmarks and CoSTs tend to be lexically specialized resources, speakers of LoG routinely deploy polyfunctional resources such as the CoST <em>achso</em> as newsmarks. In addition, we discuss the role of prosody as a contextualization cue in the use of <em>achso</em> as a polyfunctional token. In sum, this paper sheds new light on the continuum between newsmarks and CoSTs in talk-in-interaction and contributes to our understanding of these indexes in comparative variational pragmatics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens in High German and Low German talk-in-interaction – A variational-pragmatic and interactional perspective
By adopting the approaches of variational pragmatics and interactional analysis, this paper presents a comparative analysis of ‘newsmarks’ as token-based responses, registering a prior turn as new information in mundane conversation in two different varieties of one language, namely North-West High German (NHG), a regional near-standard variety, and the Westphalian Low German dialect variety (LoG). It aims to illustrate how a variational perspective can further our understanding of analytic concepts that are largely based on single-language studies. In particular, we address the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens (CoSTs). Based on a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis, we show that NHG and LoG differ in the formats routinely used for marking a prior as news. Moreover, our study reveals that while in NHG newsmarks and CoSTs tend to be lexically specialized resources, speakers of LoG routinely deploy polyfunctional resources such as the CoST achso as newsmarks. In addition, we discuss the role of prosody as a contextualization cue in the use of achso as a polyfunctional token. In sum, this paper sheds new light on the continuum between newsmarks and CoSTs in talk-in-interaction and contributes to our understanding of these indexes in comparative variational pragmatics.
期刊介绍:
Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.