探究高德语和低德语互动对话中新闻标记和状态变化标记之间的模糊界限——一个变分语用和互动的视角

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Kathrin Weber , Katharina König
{"title":"探究高德语和低德语互动对话中新闻标记和状态变化标记之间的模糊界限——一个变分语用和互动的视角","authors":"Kathrin Weber ,&nbsp;Katharina König","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By adopting the approaches of variational pragmatics and interactional analysis, this paper presents a comparative analysis of ‘newsmarks’ as token-based responses, registering a prior turn as new information in mundane conversation in two different varieties of one language, namely North-West High German (NHG), a regional near-standard variety, and the Westphalian Low German dialect variety (LoG). It aims to illustrate how a variational perspective can further our understanding of analytic concepts that are largely based on single-language studies. In particular, we address the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens (CoSTs). Based on a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis, we show that NHG and LoG differ in the formats routinely used for marking a prior as news. Moreover, our study reveals that while in NHG newsmarks and CoSTs tend to be lexically specialized resources, speakers of LoG routinely deploy polyfunctional resources such as the CoST <em>achso</em> as newsmarks. In addition, we discuss the role of prosody as a contextualization cue in the use of <em>achso</em> as a polyfunctional token. In sum, this paper sheds new light on the continuum between newsmarks and CoSTs in talk-in-interaction and contributes to our understanding of these indexes in comparative variational pragmatics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"242 ","pages":"Pages 93-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens in High German and Low German talk-in-interaction – A variational-pragmatic and interactional perspective\",\"authors\":\"Kathrin Weber ,&nbsp;Katharina König\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>By adopting the approaches of variational pragmatics and interactional analysis, this paper presents a comparative analysis of ‘newsmarks’ as token-based responses, registering a prior turn as new information in mundane conversation in two different varieties of one language, namely North-West High German (NHG), a regional near-standard variety, and the Westphalian Low German dialect variety (LoG). It aims to illustrate how a variational perspective can further our understanding of analytic concepts that are largely based on single-language studies. In particular, we address the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens (CoSTs). Based on a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis, we show that NHG and LoG differ in the formats routinely used for marking a prior as news. Moreover, our study reveals that while in NHG newsmarks and CoSTs tend to be lexically specialized resources, speakers of LoG routinely deploy polyfunctional resources such as the CoST <em>achso</em> as newsmarks. In addition, we discuss the role of prosody as a contextualization cue in the use of <em>achso</em> as a polyfunctional token. In sum, this paper sheds new light on the continuum between newsmarks and CoSTs in talk-in-interaction and contributes to our understanding of these indexes in comparative variational pragmatics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"242 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000876\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216625000876","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用变分语用学和互动分析的方法,对“新闻标记”作为基于符号的反应进行了比较分析,将一种语言的两种不同变体,即西北高地德语(NHG),一种区域接近标准的变体,以及威斯特伐利亚低地德语方言变体(LoG),作为日常对话中的新信息记录下来。它的目的是说明如何变分的角度可以进一步我们的分析概念的理解,主要是基于单一语言的研究。特别是,我们解决了新闻标记和状态变化令牌(成本)之间的模糊界限。基于定量和定性分析的混合方法,我们表明NHG和LoG在通常用于将先验标记为新闻的格式上有所不同。此外,我们的研究表明,在NHG中,新闻标记和CoSTs往往是词汇专用的资源,而LoG的讲话者通常会将诸如CoST achso之类的多功能资源作为新闻标记。此外,我们还讨论了韵律作为上下文化线索在使用achso作为多功能标记时的作用。综上所述,本文揭示了新闻标记与互动对话成本之间的连续关系,有助于我们在比较变分语用学中对这两个指标的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens in High German and Low German talk-in-interaction – A variational-pragmatic and interactional perspective
By adopting the approaches of variational pragmatics and interactional analysis, this paper presents a comparative analysis of ‘newsmarks’ as token-based responses, registering a prior turn as new information in mundane conversation in two different varieties of one language, namely North-West High German (NHG), a regional near-standard variety, and the Westphalian Low German dialect variety (LoG). It aims to illustrate how a variational perspective can further our understanding of analytic concepts that are largely based on single-language studies. In particular, we address the fuzzy boundaries between newsmarks and change-of-state tokens (CoSTs). Based on a mixed methods approach of quantitative and qualitative analysis, we show that NHG and LoG differ in the formats routinely used for marking a prior as news. Moreover, our study reveals that while in NHG newsmarks and CoSTs tend to be lexically specialized resources, speakers of LoG routinely deploy polyfunctional resources such as the CoST achso as newsmarks. In addition, we discuss the role of prosody as a contextualization cue in the use of achso as a polyfunctional token. In sum, this paper sheds new light on the continuum between newsmarks and CoSTs in talk-in-interaction and contributes to our understanding of these indexes in comparative variational pragmatics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信