Weihua Liu , Lili Feng , Zhongen Niu , Yan Lv , Mengyu Zhang
{"title":"前环境因子记忆效应对陆地总初级生产力时间变化的重要性","authors":"Weihua Liu , Lili Feng , Zhongen Niu , Yan Lv , Mengyu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantitative estimation of temporal variation in ecosystem productivity is crucial for assessing the stability and sustainability of ecosystem carbon sinks. However, current assessments of temporal variation of gross primary productivity (GPP) suffer from inaccuracies due to oversight of the memory effect of GPP on antecedent environmental and vegetation changes. By introducing memory effect into a time-dependent deep learning model, we investigated the responses of GPP to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors, and further simulated and analyzed the temporal trend and interannual variation of GPP at site and spatial scales. Our results indicate that (i) incorporating memory effect significantly improves the explanatory power of environmental and vegetation factors on GPP magnitude, trend, and interannual variation compared to the model ignoring memory effect; (ii) the memory effect length of GPP response to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors varies across different ecosystems, ranging from 4 to 11 months. Precipitation has a longer cumulative effect on GPP compared to temperature, shortwave radiation and VPD (Vapor Pressure Deficit) in most ecosystems. The impact of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) on GPP was stronger than environmental variables, emphasizing the significance of vegetation state in GPP simulation; (iii) the global terrestrial ecosystem GPP estimated by the deep learning model considering memory effect showed an increasing trend and significant interannual variation from 1983 to 2015. This study enhanced the understanding on the driving mechanisms of antecedent environmental and vegetation factors on GPP and provided a reference for modeling of carbon cycle process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113558"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Importance of the antecedent environmental factors’ memory effects on the temporal variation of terrestrial gross primary productivity\",\"authors\":\"Weihua Liu , Lili Feng , Zhongen Niu , Yan Lv , Mengyu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Quantitative estimation of temporal variation in ecosystem productivity is crucial for assessing the stability and sustainability of ecosystem carbon sinks. However, current assessments of temporal variation of gross primary productivity (GPP) suffer from inaccuracies due to oversight of the memory effect of GPP on antecedent environmental and vegetation changes. By introducing memory effect into a time-dependent deep learning model, we investigated the responses of GPP to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors, and further simulated and analyzed the temporal trend and interannual variation of GPP at site and spatial scales. Our results indicate that (i) incorporating memory effect significantly improves the explanatory power of environmental and vegetation factors on GPP magnitude, trend, and interannual variation compared to the model ignoring memory effect; (ii) the memory effect length of GPP response to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors varies across different ecosystems, ranging from 4 to 11 months. Precipitation has a longer cumulative effect on GPP compared to temperature, shortwave radiation and VPD (Vapor Pressure Deficit) in most ecosystems. The impact of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) on GPP was stronger than environmental variables, emphasizing the significance of vegetation state in GPP simulation; (iii) the global terrestrial ecosystem GPP estimated by the deep learning model considering memory effect showed an increasing trend and significant interannual variation from 1983 to 2015. This study enhanced the understanding on the driving mechanisms of antecedent environmental and vegetation factors on GPP and provided a reference for modeling of carbon cycle process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004881\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004881","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Importance of the antecedent environmental factors’ memory effects on the temporal variation of terrestrial gross primary productivity
Quantitative estimation of temporal variation in ecosystem productivity is crucial for assessing the stability and sustainability of ecosystem carbon sinks. However, current assessments of temporal variation of gross primary productivity (GPP) suffer from inaccuracies due to oversight of the memory effect of GPP on antecedent environmental and vegetation changes. By introducing memory effect into a time-dependent deep learning model, we investigated the responses of GPP to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors, and further simulated and analyzed the temporal trend and interannual variation of GPP at site and spatial scales. Our results indicate that (i) incorporating memory effect significantly improves the explanatory power of environmental and vegetation factors on GPP magnitude, trend, and interannual variation compared to the model ignoring memory effect; (ii) the memory effect length of GPP response to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors varies across different ecosystems, ranging from 4 to 11 months. Precipitation has a longer cumulative effect on GPP compared to temperature, shortwave radiation and VPD (Vapor Pressure Deficit) in most ecosystems. The impact of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) on GPP was stronger than environmental variables, emphasizing the significance of vegetation state in GPP simulation; (iii) the global terrestrial ecosystem GPP estimated by the deep learning model considering memory effect showed an increasing trend and significant interannual variation from 1983 to 2015. This study enhanced the understanding on the driving mechanisms of antecedent environmental and vegetation factors on GPP and provided a reference for modeling of carbon cycle process.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.