{"title":"预测颅骨成形术后不良预后的因素:一项单中心分析研究","authors":"Mangalkumar Girish Rachatte , Soumya Pahari , Anil Pande , Poonam Mohanty , M.C. Vasudevan , Pooja Rokaya , Udit Raut","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aims to assess the factors predicting poor outcomes after cranioplasty (CP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional follow-up study including 80 patients who underwent CP following decompressive craniectomy (DC) and were followed up for six months. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale ≥3 at 6 months. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were used to explore the predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty patients were included; the median age was 53.5 years, and 48 were males (60%). The primary pathologies requiring DC were intracerebral hemorrhage (n= 28, 35%), traumatic brain injury (n= 27, 33.75%), and malignant middle cerebral infarction (n= 25, 31.25%). Pre-CP modified Rankin Scale was 5 in all patients, and a poor outcome was seen in 44 (55%) patients after CP. The significant predictors of poor outcome were age (odds ratio [OR= 1.96, <em>P</em>= 0.011), quadratic term age<sup>2</sup> (OR= 0.99, <em>P</em>= 0.011), primary pathology requiring DC as middle cerebral artery infarction (OR= 0.03, <em>P</em>= 0.024), dominant lobe injury (OR= 48.24, <em>P</em>= 0.001), presence of any post-DC complications (OR= 61.01, <em>P</em> = 0.025), use of CP material other than autologous skull flap (OR= 10.09, <em>P</em>= 0.035), and indication for CP other than for cosmesis (OR= 25.86, <em>P</em>= 0.014). Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale was not a predictor of poor outcome (<em>P</em>= 0.586)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both preoperative patient characteristics and procedural factors significantly influence post-CP recovery. Long-term functional outcomes are determined by patient factors like age, nature of injury (e.g., dominant lobe vs. nondominant lobe, which might affect rehabilitation potential), and surgical factors instead of initial neurological status.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 123957"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Predicting Poor Outcomes Following Cranioplasty: A Single Center Analytical Study\",\"authors\":\"Mangalkumar Girish Rachatte , Soumya Pahari , Anil Pande , Poonam Mohanty , M.C. Vasudevan , Pooja Rokaya , Udit Raut\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aims to assess the factors predicting poor outcomes after cranioplasty (CP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional follow-up study including 80 patients who underwent CP following decompressive craniectomy (DC) and were followed up for six months. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale ≥3 at 6 months. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were used to explore the predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty patients were included; the median age was 53.5 years, and 48 were males (60%). The primary pathologies requiring DC were intracerebral hemorrhage (n= 28, 35%), traumatic brain injury (n= 27, 33.75%), and malignant middle cerebral infarction (n= 25, 31.25%). Pre-CP modified Rankin Scale was 5 in all patients, and a poor outcome was seen in 44 (55%) patients after CP. The significant predictors of poor outcome were age (odds ratio [OR= 1.96, <em>P</em>= 0.011), quadratic term age<sup>2</sup> (OR= 0.99, <em>P</em>= 0.011), primary pathology requiring DC as middle cerebral artery infarction (OR= 0.03, <em>P</em>= 0.024), dominant lobe injury (OR= 48.24, <em>P</em>= 0.001), presence of any post-DC complications (OR= 61.01, <em>P</em> = 0.025), use of CP material other than autologous skull flap (OR= 10.09, <em>P</em>= 0.035), and indication for CP other than for cosmesis (OR= 25.86, <em>P</em>= 0.014). Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale was not a predictor of poor outcome (<em>P</em>= 0.586)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both preoperative patient characteristics and procedural factors significantly influence post-CP recovery. Long-term functional outcomes are determined by patient factors like age, nature of injury (e.g., dominant lobe vs. nondominant lobe, which might affect rehabilitation potential), and surgical factors instead of initial neurological status.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123957\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025003134\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025003134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors Predicting Poor Outcomes Following Cranioplasty: A Single Center Analytical Study
Objective
The study aims to assess the factors predicting poor outcomes after cranioplasty (CP).
Methods
A cross-sectional follow-up study including 80 patients who underwent CP following decompressive craniectomy (DC) and were followed up for six months. Poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale ≥3 at 6 months. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were used to explore the predictors.
Results
Eighty patients were included; the median age was 53.5 years, and 48 were males (60%). The primary pathologies requiring DC were intracerebral hemorrhage (n= 28, 35%), traumatic brain injury (n= 27, 33.75%), and malignant middle cerebral infarction (n= 25, 31.25%). Pre-CP modified Rankin Scale was 5 in all patients, and a poor outcome was seen in 44 (55%) patients after CP. The significant predictors of poor outcome were age (odds ratio [OR= 1.96, P= 0.011), quadratic term age2 (OR= 0.99, P= 0.011), primary pathology requiring DC as middle cerebral artery infarction (OR= 0.03, P= 0.024), dominant lobe injury (OR= 48.24, P= 0.001), presence of any post-DC complications (OR= 61.01, P = 0.025), use of CP material other than autologous skull flap (OR= 10.09, P= 0.035), and indication for CP other than for cosmesis (OR= 25.86, P= 0.014). Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale was not a predictor of poor outcome (P= 0.586)
Conclusions
Both preoperative patient characteristics and procedural factors significantly influence post-CP recovery. Long-term functional outcomes are determined by patient factors like age, nature of injury (e.g., dominant lobe vs. nondominant lobe, which might affect rehabilitation potential), and surgical factors instead of initial neurological status.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS