最佳实践的实验设计,测试和报告的水性聚苯甲酸酯降解技术

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Allyson Leigh Junker, Jan-Max Arana Juve, Lu Bai, Charlotte Skjold Qvist Christensen, Lutz Ahrens, Ian T. Cousins, Mohamed Ateia, Zongsu Wei
{"title":"最佳实践的实验设计,测试和报告的水性聚苯甲酸酯降解技术","authors":"Allyson Leigh Junker, Jan-Max Arana Juve, Lu Bai, Charlotte Skjold Qvist Christensen, Lutz Ahrens, Ian T. Cousins, Mohamed Ateia, Zongsu Wei","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c08571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased awareness of pervasive per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and the need for zero-pollution treatment solutions necessitate the scientific and engineering community to respond urgently and systematically. Existing approaches lack reproducible and standardized methods to report the technological treatment capabilities. Consequently, it is difficult to compare innovations and accurately assess their potential. In this Perspective, we shed light on hurdles encountered in the lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction technologies with a focus on chemical methods and offer recommendations for overcoming them. Best practices are provided for developing robust PFAS laboratory protocols covering crucial aspects such as experimental planning, sample storage and analysis, and waste management. Further, we present five criteria to standardize reporting on performance and advances in PFAS degrading technologies: 1) scope, 2) defluorination efficiency, 3) relative energy consumption, 4) material stability, and 5) unit process considerations. Through the dissemination of these insights, we aim to foster progress in the development of highly effective treatment solutions.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Practices for Experimental Design, Testing, and Reporting of Aqueous PFAS-Degrading Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Allyson Leigh Junker, Jan-Max Arana Juve, Lu Bai, Charlotte Skjold Qvist Christensen, Lutz Ahrens, Ian T. Cousins, Mohamed Ateia, Zongsu Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c08571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increased awareness of pervasive per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and the need for zero-pollution treatment solutions necessitate the scientific and engineering community to respond urgently and systematically. Existing approaches lack reproducible and standardized methods to report the technological treatment capabilities. Consequently, it is difficult to compare innovations and accurately assess their potential. In this Perspective, we shed light on hurdles encountered in the lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction technologies with a focus on chemical methods and offer recommendations for overcoming them. Best practices are provided for developing robust PFAS laboratory protocols covering crucial aspects such as experimental planning, sample storage and analysis, and waste management. Further, we present five criteria to standardize reporting on performance and advances in PFAS degrading technologies: 1) scope, 2) defluorination efficiency, 3) relative energy consumption, 4) material stability, and 5) unit process considerations. Through the dissemination of these insights, we aim to foster progress in the development of highly effective treatment solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08571\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高对普遍存在的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)污染的认识,以及对零污染处理解决方案的需要,促使科学界和工程界紧急和系统地作出反应。现有方法缺乏可重复和标准化的方法来报告技术处理能力。因此,很难比较创新并准确评估其潜力。从这个角度来看,我们揭示了在实验室规模的研究和开发中遇到的障碍,重点是化学方法,并提出了克服这些障碍的建议。提供了制定强大的PFAS实验室方案的最佳实践,涵盖实验计划、样品储存和分析以及废物管理等关键方面。此外,我们提出了五个标准来规范PFAS降解技术的性能和进展报告:1)范围,2)除氟效率,3)相对能耗,4)材料稳定性,以及5)单元工艺考虑。通过传播这些见解,我们的目标是促进在开发高效治疗方案方面取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Best Practices for Experimental Design, Testing, and Reporting of Aqueous PFAS-Degrading Technologies

Best Practices for Experimental Design, Testing, and Reporting of Aqueous PFAS-Degrading Technologies
Increased awareness of pervasive per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and the need for zero-pollution treatment solutions necessitate the scientific and engineering community to respond urgently and systematically. Existing approaches lack reproducible and standardized methods to report the technological treatment capabilities. Consequently, it is difficult to compare innovations and accurately assess their potential. In this Perspective, we shed light on hurdles encountered in the lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction technologies with a focus on chemical methods and offer recommendations for overcoming them. Best practices are provided for developing robust PFAS laboratory protocols covering crucial aspects such as experimental planning, sample storage and analysis, and waste management. Further, we present five criteria to standardize reporting on performance and advances in PFAS degrading technologies: 1) scope, 2) defluorination efficiency, 3) relative energy consumption, 4) material stability, and 5) unit process considerations. Through the dissemination of these insights, we aim to foster progress in the development of highly effective treatment solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信