Allyson Leigh Junker, Jan-Max Arana Juve, Lu Bai, Charlotte Skjold Qvist Christensen, Lutz Ahrens, Ian T. Cousins, Mohamed Ateia, Zongsu Wei
{"title":"最佳实践的实验设计,测试和报告的水性聚苯甲酸酯降解技术","authors":"Allyson Leigh Junker, Jan-Max Arana Juve, Lu Bai, Charlotte Skjold Qvist Christensen, Lutz Ahrens, Ian T. Cousins, Mohamed Ateia, Zongsu Wei","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c08571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased awareness of pervasive per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and the need for zero-pollution treatment solutions necessitate the scientific and engineering community to respond urgently and systematically. Existing approaches lack reproducible and standardized methods to report the technological treatment capabilities. Consequently, it is difficult to compare innovations and accurately assess their potential. In this Perspective, we shed light on hurdles encountered in the lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction technologies with a focus on chemical methods and offer recommendations for overcoming them. Best practices are provided for developing robust PFAS laboratory protocols covering crucial aspects such as experimental planning, sample storage and analysis, and waste management. Further, we present five criteria to standardize reporting on performance and advances in PFAS degrading technologies: 1) scope, 2) defluorination efficiency, 3) relative energy consumption, 4) material stability, and 5) unit process considerations. Through the dissemination of these insights, we aim to foster progress in the development of highly effective treatment solutions.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Practices for Experimental Design, Testing, and Reporting of Aqueous PFAS-Degrading Technologies\",\"authors\":\"Allyson Leigh Junker, Jan-Max Arana Juve, Lu Bai, Charlotte Skjold Qvist Christensen, Lutz Ahrens, Ian T. Cousins, Mohamed Ateia, Zongsu Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c08571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Increased awareness of pervasive per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and the need for zero-pollution treatment solutions necessitate the scientific and engineering community to respond urgently and systematically. Existing approaches lack reproducible and standardized methods to report the technological treatment capabilities. Consequently, it is difficult to compare innovations and accurately assess their potential. In this Perspective, we shed light on hurdles encountered in the lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction technologies with a focus on chemical methods and offer recommendations for overcoming them. Best practices are provided for developing robust PFAS laboratory protocols covering crucial aspects such as experimental planning, sample storage and analysis, and waste management. Further, we present five criteria to standardize reporting on performance and advances in PFAS degrading technologies: 1) scope, 2) defluorination efficiency, 3) relative energy consumption, 4) material stability, and 5) unit process considerations. Through the dissemination of these insights, we aim to foster progress in the development of highly effective treatment solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08571\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Best Practices for Experimental Design, Testing, and Reporting of Aqueous PFAS-Degrading Technologies
Increased awareness of pervasive per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination and the need for zero-pollution treatment solutions necessitate the scientific and engineering community to respond urgently and systematically. Existing approaches lack reproducible and standardized methods to report the technological treatment capabilities. Consequently, it is difficult to compare innovations and accurately assess their potential. In this Perspective, we shed light on hurdles encountered in the lab-scale research and development of aqueous PFAS destruction technologies with a focus on chemical methods and offer recommendations for overcoming them. Best practices are provided for developing robust PFAS laboratory protocols covering crucial aspects such as experimental planning, sample storage and analysis, and waste management. Further, we present five criteria to standardize reporting on performance and advances in PFAS degrading technologies: 1) scope, 2) defluorination efficiency, 3) relative energy consumption, 4) material stability, and 5) unit process considerations. Through the dissemination of these insights, we aim to foster progress in the development of highly effective treatment solutions.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.