生物导向牙槽嵴保存的临床和组织学结果:一项前瞻性观察研究

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Antonio Rapani, Leonardo Tonegato, Paolo Savadori, Rebecca Martini, Riccardo Pasquali, Matteo Zotti, Vanessa Nicolin, Federico Berton, Claudio Stacchi
{"title":"生物导向牙槽嵴保存的临床和组织学结果:一项前瞻性观察研究","authors":"Antonio Rapani,&nbsp;Leonardo Tonegato,&nbsp;Paolo Savadori,&nbsp;Rebecca Martini,&nbsp;Riccardo Pasquali,&nbsp;Matteo Zotti,&nbsp;Vanessa Nicolin,&nbsp;Federico Berton,&nbsp;Claudio Stacchi","doi":"10.1111/cid.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Biologically oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation (BARP) in minimizing post-extraction ridge modifications compared with unassisted socket healing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective controlled observational study was conducted involving 30 patients requiring single-rooted upper premolar extractions. Patients were divided into two groups: the test (15 patients), which underwent a ridge preservation procedure combining absorbable collagen sponge in the middle and apical third of the socket and collagenated xenogeneic bone substitute in the most coronal part (BARP), and the control (15 patients), which healed spontaneously. Soft tissue contour changes after 6 months were analyzed using digital impressions. Moreover, histomorphometric analysis of the regenerated tissue was performed in the test group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>BARP significantly reduced post-extractive mucosal ridge modifications compared to the control group. Mean vertical shrinkage at the mid-buccal part of the edentulous site was 1.61 ± 0.61 mm (BARP) vs. 2.51 ± 0.64 mm (control; <i>t</i>-test, df = 28, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and mean horizontal reduction was 3.37 ± 0.63 mm (BARP) vs. 4.34 ± 0.48 mm (control; <i>t</i>-test, df = 28, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Histomorphometric analysis of the regenerated tissue showed 39.7% ± 9.1% newly formed bone with minimal residual graft material (5.0% ± 5.4%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>BARP technique effectively minimizes post-extractive soft tissue contour modifications and supports natural bone regeneration, resulting in adequate bone dimensions for implant rehabilitation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Biologically Oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Prospective Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Rapani,&nbsp;Leonardo Tonegato,&nbsp;Paolo Savadori,&nbsp;Rebecca Martini,&nbsp;Riccardo Pasquali,&nbsp;Matteo Zotti,&nbsp;Vanessa Nicolin,&nbsp;Federico Berton,&nbsp;Claudio Stacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.70048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Biologically oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation (BARP) in minimizing post-extraction ridge modifications compared with unassisted socket healing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prospective controlled observational study was conducted involving 30 patients requiring single-rooted upper premolar extractions. Patients were divided into two groups: the test (15 patients), which underwent a ridge preservation procedure combining absorbable collagen sponge in the middle and apical third of the socket and collagenated xenogeneic bone substitute in the most coronal part (BARP), and the control (15 patients), which healed spontaneously. Soft tissue contour changes after 6 months were analyzed using digital impressions. Moreover, histomorphometric analysis of the regenerated tissue was performed in the test group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>BARP significantly reduced post-extractive mucosal ridge modifications compared to the control group. Mean vertical shrinkage at the mid-buccal part of the edentulous site was 1.61 ± 0.61 mm (BARP) vs. 2.51 ± 0.64 mm (control; <i>t</i>-test, df = 28, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and mean horizontal reduction was 3.37 ± 0.63 mm (BARP) vs. 4.34 ± 0.48 mm (control; <i>t</i>-test, df = 28, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Histomorphometric analysis of the regenerated tissue showed 39.7% ± 9.1% newly formed bone with minimal residual graft material (5.0% ± 5.4%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>BARP technique effectively minimizes post-extractive soft tissue contour modifications and supports natural bone regeneration, resulting in adequate bone dimensions for implant rehabilitation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70048\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估生物定向牙槽嵴保存(BARP)在最大限度减少拔牙后牙槽嵴改变方面的疗效,并与无辅助的牙槽嵴愈合进行比较。方法对30例需要单根上颌前磨牙拔牙的患者进行前瞻性对照观察研究。患者被分为两组:实验组(15例)和对照组(15例),实验组采用牙槽骨中部和根尖三分之一处的可吸收胶原海绵和最冠状部分的胶原异种骨替代物(BARP)相结合的牙槽嵴保存术;对照组(15例)自行愈合。6个月后用数字印模分析软组织轮廓变化。实验组对再生组织进行组织形态学分析。结果与对照组相比,BARP显著减少了拔牙后粘膜脊的改变。无牙区中颊部平均垂直收缩为1.61±0.61 mm (BARP) vs. 2.51±0.64 mm(对照组;t检验,df = 28, p < 0.001),平均水平降低为3.37±0.63 mm (BARP) vs. 4.34±0.48 mm(对照组;t检验,df = 28, p < 0.001)。再生组织的组织形态学分析显示:新生骨39.7%±9.1%,移植材料残留极小(5.0%±5.4%)。结论BARP技术有效地减少了拔牙后软组织轮廓的改变,支持骨的自然再生,为种植体修复提供了足够的骨尺寸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Biologically Oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Prospective Observational Study

Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Biologically Oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Biologically oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation (BARP) in minimizing post-extraction ridge modifications compared with unassisted socket healing.

Methods

A prospective controlled observational study was conducted involving 30 patients requiring single-rooted upper premolar extractions. Patients were divided into two groups: the test (15 patients), which underwent a ridge preservation procedure combining absorbable collagen sponge in the middle and apical third of the socket and collagenated xenogeneic bone substitute in the most coronal part (BARP), and the control (15 patients), which healed spontaneously. Soft tissue contour changes after 6 months were analyzed using digital impressions. Moreover, histomorphometric analysis of the regenerated tissue was performed in the test group.

Results

BARP significantly reduced post-extractive mucosal ridge modifications compared to the control group. Mean vertical shrinkage at the mid-buccal part of the edentulous site was 1.61 ± 0.61 mm (BARP) vs. 2.51 ± 0.64 mm (control; t-test, df = 28, p < 0.001), and mean horizontal reduction was 3.37 ± 0.63 mm (BARP) vs. 4.34 ± 0.48 mm (control; t-test, df = 28, p < 0.001). Histomorphometric analysis of the regenerated tissue showed 39.7% ± 9.1% newly formed bone with minimal residual graft material (5.0% ± 5.4%).

Conclusion

BARP technique effectively minimizes post-extractive soft tissue contour modifications and supports natural bone regeneration, resulting in adequate bone dimensions for implant rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信