基于学校的自杀预防看门人干预和实施干预的可行性(项目ROS):研究方案

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Lena Rossen Østergaard, Lotus Sofie Bast, Rory C. O'Connor, Erik Christiansen
{"title":"基于学校的自杀预防看门人干预和实施干预的可行性(项目ROS):研究方案","authors":"Lena Rossen Østergaard,&nbsp;Lotus Sofie Bast,&nbsp;Rory C. O'Connor,&nbsp;Erik Christiansen","doi":"10.1111/eip.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the high risk of suicidal behaviour in youth, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions within school settings for those who are at increased risk. The Project ROS (in Realise, Convince and Refer in Danish Realiser, Overbevis og Send videre) will train teaching staff and implement QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer), a suicide prevention gatekeeper intervention supported by an implementation intervention at specialised schools (FGU) in Denmark.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the feasibility of delivering school-based QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) gatekeeper training, supported by an implementation intervention based on evidence-based implementation strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A two-phase case study with a feasibility hybrid evaluation design. The evaluation will include a multimethod approach including pre-, post- and follow-up survey measurements, field observations and semi-structured single and focus group interviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>A multimethod design will be used to validate the results. The use of methodological triangulation will help to reduce bias and deficiencies compared to using a single-method design.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eip.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of a School-Based Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Intervention and an Implementation Intervention (Project ROS): Study Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Lena Rossen Østergaard,&nbsp;Lotus Sofie Bast,&nbsp;Rory C. O'Connor,&nbsp;Erik Christiansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the high risk of suicidal behaviour in youth, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions within school settings for those who are at increased risk. The Project ROS (in Realise, Convince and Refer in Danish Realiser, Overbevis og Send videre) will train teaching staff and implement QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer), a suicide prevention gatekeeper intervention supported by an implementation intervention at specialised schools (FGU) in Denmark.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine the feasibility of delivering school-based QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) gatekeeper training, supported by an implementation intervention based on evidence-based implementation strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A two-phase case study with a feasibility hybrid evaluation design. The evaluation will include a multimethod approach including pre-, post- and follow-up survey measurements, field observations and semi-structured single and focus group interviews.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multimethod design will be used to validate the results. The use of methodological triangulation will help to reduce bias and deficiencies compared to using a single-method design.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eip.70050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管青少年自杀行为的风险很高,但在学校环境中缺乏针对风险增加者的循证干预措施。项目ROS(在丹麦Realiser、Overbevis和Send videre中有实现、说服和推荐)将培训教学人员并实施QPR(提问、说服、推荐),这是一种自杀预防看门人干预,由丹麦特殊学校(FGU)的实施干预支持。目的确定在基于循证实施策略的实施干预支持下,实施校本QPR(提问、说服、参考)看门人培训的可行性。方法采用可行性混合评价设计的两阶段案例研究。评价将包括一种多方法方法,包括事前、事后和后续调查测量、实地观察和半结构化的单一和焦点小组访谈。将采用多方法设计来验证结果。与使用单一方法设计相比,使用方法学三角测量将有助于减少偏差和缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility of a School-Based Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Intervention and an Implementation Intervention (Project ROS): Study Protocol

Feasibility of a School-Based Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Intervention and an Implementation Intervention (Project ROS): Study Protocol

Background

Despite the high risk of suicidal behaviour in youth, there is a lack of evidence-based interventions within school settings for those who are at increased risk. The Project ROS (in Realise, Convince and Refer in Danish Realiser, Overbevis og Send videre) will train teaching staff and implement QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer), a suicide prevention gatekeeper intervention supported by an implementation intervention at specialised schools (FGU) in Denmark.

Aim

To determine the feasibility of delivering school-based QPR (Question, Persuade, Refer) gatekeeper training, supported by an implementation intervention based on evidence-based implementation strategies.

Methods

A two-phase case study with a feasibility hybrid evaluation design. The evaluation will include a multimethod approach including pre-, post- and follow-up survey measurements, field observations and semi-structured single and focus group interviews.

Discussion

A multimethod design will be used to validate the results. The use of methodological triangulation will help to reduce bias and deficiencies compared to using a single-method design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信