探索机会,以一种严肃的方式改善混合农场的作物-牲畜整合和生产:以半干旱的布基纳法索为例

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gildas G.C. Assogba , Erika N. Speelman , David Berre , Myriam Adam , Katrien Descheemaeker
{"title":"探索机会,以一种严肃的方式改善混合农场的作物-牲畜整合和生产:以半干旱的布基纳法索为例","authors":"Gildas G.C. Assogba ,&nbsp;Erika N. Speelman ,&nbsp;David Berre ,&nbsp;Myriam Adam ,&nbsp;Katrien Descheemaeker","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Serious games are increasingly recognised as powerful tools to deepen knowledge and stimulate (social) learning among game participants.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We developed a serious game, called QUEEN, to better understand farmer decision-making and to explore potential options to improve crop-livestock integration and production as seen from the farmer perspective using a case study of a semi-arid farming system in Burkina Faso.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The development of the serious game was an iterative process with several rounds in which local farmers and local researchers played a pivotal role. The game included options for soil fertility management, crop and livestock production, market opportunities and interactions among participants. Three game sessions were organized to collect data on farmers' decision-making and management strategies. Beyond gameplay, the game was used as an experimental platform—its solution space was explored through simulations to assess the outcomes of possible strategies, and the impacts of assumptions and game's mechanics on the game's outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>We showed that while the participants remained generally close to their real-life farm management, in the game they all applied mulch, cereal-legume strip intercropping and rotations, which is less common in reality. This demonstrates the capacity of the game to encourage farmers to explore alternative practices. The solution space exploration helped identify trade-offs between objectives (e.g., livestock production vs. income generation), and pathways to improve crop-livestock integration.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>QUEEN is a valuable learning and research tool for Burkina Faso and other semi-arid systems, engaging stakeholders in critical reflection on system constraints and innovations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 104364"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring opportunities to improve crop-livestock integration and production in mixed farms with a serious game: The case of semi-arid Burkina Faso\",\"authors\":\"Gildas G.C. Assogba ,&nbsp;Erika N. Speelman ,&nbsp;David Berre ,&nbsp;Myriam Adam ,&nbsp;Katrien Descheemaeker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Serious games are increasingly recognised as powerful tools to deepen knowledge and stimulate (social) learning among game participants.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We developed a serious game, called QUEEN, to better understand farmer decision-making and to explore potential options to improve crop-livestock integration and production as seen from the farmer perspective using a case study of a semi-arid farming system in Burkina Faso.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The development of the serious game was an iterative process with several rounds in which local farmers and local researchers played a pivotal role. The game included options for soil fertility management, crop and livestock production, market opportunities and interactions among participants. Three game sessions were organized to collect data on farmers' decision-making and management strategies. Beyond gameplay, the game was used as an experimental platform—its solution space was explored through simulations to assess the outcomes of possible strategies, and the impacts of assumptions and game's mechanics on the game's outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>We showed that while the participants remained generally close to their real-life farm management, in the game they all applied mulch, cereal-legume strip intercropping and rotations, which is less common in reality. This demonstrates the capacity of the game to encourage farmers to explore alternative practices. The solution space exploration helped identify trade-offs between objectives (e.g., livestock production vs. income generation), and pathways to improve crop-livestock integration.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>QUEEN is a valuable learning and research tool for Burkina Faso and other semi-arid systems, engaging stakeholders in critical reflection on system constraints and innovations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"227 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001040\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严肃游戏越来越被认为是游戏参与者加深知识和刺激(社交)学习的强大工具。我们开发了一款名为QUEEN的严肃游戏,以更好地了解农民的决策,并通过对布基纳法索半干旱农业系统的案例研究,从农民的角度探索改善作物-牲畜一体化和生产的潜在选择。方法严肃游戏的开发是一个反复的过程,在几个回合中,当地农民和当地研究人员发挥了关键作用。该游戏包括土壤肥力管理、作物和牲畜生产、市场机会以及参与者之间的互动等选项。组织了三场游戏,收集农民决策和管理策略的数据。除了游戏玩法,游戏还被用作实验平台——通过模拟来探索其解决方案空间,以评估可能策略的结果,以及假设和游戏机制对游戏结果的影响。结果和结论我们发现,虽然参与者大致接近他们的现实农场管理,但在游戏中他们都采用了覆盖,谷物-豆类带状间作和轮作,这在现实中不太常见。这证明了该游戏鼓励农民探索替代做法的能力。解决方案空间探索有助于确定目标之间的权衡(例如,畜牧业生产与创收),以及改善作物-畜牧业一体化的途径。queeen是布基纳法索和其他半干旱系统的宝贵学习和研究工具,使利益攸关方参与对系统约束和创新的批判性反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring opportunities to improve crop-livestock integration and production in mixed farms with a serious game: The case of semi-arid Burkina Faso

Exploring opportunities to improve crop-livestock integration and production in mixed farms with a serious game: The case of semi-arid Burkina Faso

Context

Serious games are increasingly recognised as powerful tools to deepen knowledge and stimulate (social) learning among game participants.

Objective

We developed a serious game, called QUEEN, to better understand farmer decision-making and to explore potential options to improve crop-livestock integration and production as seen from the farmer perspective using a case study of a semi-arid farming system in Burkina Faso.

Methods

The development of the serious game was an iterative process with several rounds in which local farmers and local researchers played a pivotal role. The game included options for soil fertility management, crop and livestock production, market opportunities and interactions among participants. Three game sessions were organized to collect data on farmers' decision-making and management strategies. Beyond gameplay, the game was used as an experimental platform—its solution space was explored through simulations to assess the outcomes of possible strategies, and the impacts of assumptions and game's mechanics on the game's outcomes.

Results and conclusions

We showed that while the participants remained generally close to their real-life farm management, in the game they all applied mulch, cereal-legume strip intercropping and rotations, which is less common in reality. This demonstrates the capacity of the game to encourage farmers to explore alternative practices. The solution space exploration helped identify trade-offs between objectives (e.g., livestock production vs. income generation), and pathways to improve crop-livestock integration.

Significance

QUEEN is a valuable learning and research tool for Burkina Faso and other semi-arid systems, engaging stakeholders in critical reflection on system constraints and innovations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信