低成本箱型树木繁殖系统对启动低地热带森林恢复时框架种田间表现的影响

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Preeyaphat Chaiklang , Stephen Elliott , Sutthathorn Chairuangsri , Pimonrat Tiansawat
{"title":"低成本箱型树木繁殖系统对启动低地热带森林恢复时框架种田间表现的影响","authors":"Preeyaphat Chaiklang ,&nbsp;Stephen Elliott ,&nbsp;Sutthathorn Chairuangsri ,&nbsp;Pimonrat Tiansawat","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The need for cost-effective nursery techniques that maximize planted tree performance is growing, to meet surging demand from forest-ecosystem restoration projects around the tropics. We tested the hypothesis that propagating trees in polybags in bottle-crates promotes air root-pruning, thus stimulating root development and improving 1<sup>st</sup>-year performance of trees, planted to restore tropical forest. Working with five framework tree species (those that catalyse forest-ecosystem restoration), in a small-scale nursery in southern Thailand, we compared: 1) saplings in polybags in crates on the ground (COG) and 2) the same, raised on wire benches (COB), with 3) a control: non-crated polybags on the ground (CON). Sapling growth and survival were recorded monthly for 358 days, after which root dry weight and architecture were assessed. Saplings were then planted in a restoration plot, and their survival and growth monitored over the first growing season. In the nursery, crating substantially reduced shoot:root ratios (on average by 59.4 %, with COG). In the field, crating significantly increased mean height growth of almost all species, by up to 71.0 % and crown expansion by up to 32.5 %. The COB and COG treatments increased mean sapling performance index (combined growth &amp; survival, across species), from the control value of 56.5 to 81.8 and 82.6 respectively (P=0.017 and 0.005), with COG being the most cost-effective method (saving 4-5 cents per tree). Crating is recommended for producing saplings for forest restoration and potentially for agroforestry, community forestry etc. The system repurposes a commonplace resource (discarded crates)—a more environmentally-friendly solution than importing purpose-made root-trainers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a low-cost crate-based tree-propagation system on the field performance of framework species when initiating lowland tropical forest restoration\",\"authors\":\"Preeyaphat Chaiklang ,&nbsp;Stephen Elliott ,&nbsp;Sutthathorn Chairuangsri ,&nbsp;Pimonrat Tiansawat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The need for cost-effective nursery techniques that maximize planted tree performance is growing, to meet surging demand from forest-ecosystem restoration projects around the tropics. We tested the hypothesis that propagating trees in polybags in bottle-crates promotes air root-pruning, thus stimulating root development and improving 1<sup>st</sup>-year performance of trees, planted to restore tropical forest. Working with five framework tree species (those that catalyse forest-ecosystem restoration), in a small-scale nursery in southern Thailand, we compared: 1) saplings in polybags in crates on the ground (COG) and 2) the same, raised on wire benches (COB), with 3) a control: non-crated polybags on the ground (CON). Sapling growth and survival were recorded monthly for 358 days, after which root dry weight and architecture were assessed. Saplings were then planted in a restoration plot, and their survival and growth monitored over the first growing season. In the nursery, crating substantially reduced shoot:root ratios (on average by 59.4 %, with COG). In the field, crating significantly increased mean height growth of almost all species, by up to 71.0 % and crown expansion by up to 32.5 %. The COB and COG treatments increased mean sapling performance index (combined growth &amp; survival, across species), from the control value of 56.5 to 81.8 and 82.6 respectively (P=0.017 and 0.005), with COG being the most cost-effective method (saving 4-5 cents per tree). Crating is recommended for producing saplings for forest restoration and potentially for agroforestry, community forestry etc. The system repurposes a commonplace resource (discarded crates)—a more environmentally-friendly solution than importing purpose-made root-trainers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trees, Forests and People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了满足热带地区森林生态系统恢复项目不断增长的需求,人们越来越需要具有成本效益的苗圃技术,以最大限度地提高种植树木的性能。我们测试了一个假设,即在瓶箱中的塑料袋中繁殖树木可以促进空气根修剪,从而刺激根系发育,提高树木的第一年性能,用于恢复热带森林。在泰国南部的一个小型苗圃中,我们研究了五种框架树种(那些催化森林生态系统恢复的树种),我们比较了:1)地面板条箱中塑料袋中的树苗(COG), 2)同样的树苗,在金属丝长凳上饲养(COB), 3)地面无箱塑料袋的对照树苗(CON)。358 d,每月记录幼苗生长和存活情况,评价根系干重和结构。然后在恢复地块种植树苗,并在第一个生长季节监测它们的存活和生长。在苗圃中,板条箱显著降低了茎根比(COG平均降低59.4%)。在田间,创箱显著提高了几乎所有树种的平均生长率,最高可达71.0%,树冠扩张率最高可达32.5%。COB和COG处理提高了幼苗综合生长指数;(P=0.017和0.005),从对照值56.5分别提高到81.8和82.6 (P=0.017和0.005),其中COG是最具成本效益的方法(每棵树节省4-5美分)。建议种植树苗用于森林恢复,也可能用于农林业、社区林业等。该系统重新利用了一种常见的资源(废弃的板条箱),这是一种比进口专门制造的根训练器更环保的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a low-cost crate-based tree-propagation system on the field performance of framework species when initiating lowland tropical forest restoration
The need for cost-effective nursery techniques that maximize planted tree performance is growing, to meet surging demand from forest-ecosystem restoration projects around the tropics. We tested the hypothesis that propagating trees in polybags in bottle-crates promotes air root-pruning, thus stimulating root development and improving 1st-year performance of trees, planted to restore tropical forest. Working with five framework tree species (those that catalyse forest-ecosystem restoration), in a small-scale nursery in southern Thailand, we compared: 1) saplings in polybags in crates on the ground (COG) and 2) the same, raised on wire benches (COB), with 3) a control: non-crated polybags on the ground (CON). Sapling growth and survival were recorded monthly for 358 days, after which root dry weight and architecture were assessed. Saplings were then planted in a restoration plot, and their survival and growth monitored over the first growing season. In the nursery, crating substantially reduced shoot:root ratios (on average by 59.4 %, with COG). In the field, crating significantly increased mean height growth of almost all species, by up to 71.0 % and crown expansion by up to 32.5 %. The COB and COG treatments increased mean sapling performance index (combined growth & survival, across species), from the control value of 56.5 to 81.8 and 82.6 respectively (P=0.017 and 0.005), with COG being the most cost-effective method (saving 4-5 cents per tree). Crating is recommended for producing saplings for forest restoration and potentially for agroforestry, community forestry etc. The system repurposes a commonplace resource (discarded crates)—a more environmentally-friendly solution than importing purpose-made root-trainers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信