一种以甲烷为标记物区分奶牛呼出和瘤胃呼出挥发性有机化合物的取样方法

M.A. Barrientos-Blanco , U. Arshad , S. Giannoukos , M.Z. Islam , C. Kunz , R. Peng , S.E. Räisänen , R. Zenobi , M. Niu
{"title":"一种以甲烷为标记物区分奶牛呼出和瘤胃呼出挥发性有机化合物的取样方法","authors":"M.A. Barrientos-Blanco ,&nbsp;U. Arshad ,&nbsp;S. Giannoukos ,&nbsp;M.Z. Islam ,&nbsp;C. Kunz ,&nbsp;R. Peng ,&nbsp;S.E. Räisänen ,&nbsp;R. Zenobi ,&nbsp;M. Niu","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Frequent eructation in ruminant animals results in an exhaled blend of ruminal eructed and breath volatile organic compounds (VOC). The physiological distinction between the gas sources can limit the applicability of breath metabolomics (or breathomics) in describing the metabolic phenotype of cows. The objective of this study was to establish a benchmark sampling method for collecting breath samples in dairy cows while they were not eructating. Twelve multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows were enrolled to collect (1) breath (BR; bloodborne VOC exchanged at the lungs) and (2) ruminal exhaled (RE; a mixture of VOC from ruminal eructation and breaths during eructations) samples. Gas samples were collected using a head chamber (GreenFeed system) with real-time CH<sub>4</sub> readings. By monitoring eructation events, a threshold of &lt;150 mV CH<sub>4</sub> was set to sample breath, and &gt;250 mV was used to collect BR and RE. Both samples were analyzed using secondary electrospray ionization-high resolution MS (SESI-MS) and GC. Implementing CH<sub>4</sub> as a marker resulted in 80% lower CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations in BR compared with RE. Analysis using SESI-MS revealed a total of 324 and 242 features consistently identified across all periods of the study in [M-H]<sup>−</sup> and [M+H]<sup>+</sup> MS ion mode, respectively, for BR and RE. In BR, 18 features exhibited greater concentrations, whereas 8 had a tendency to have greater concentrations compared with RE. In contrast, RE revealed 51 features with greater concentrations, and 13 with a tendency for greater concentrations compared with BR. Ruminal VFA acetate, propionate, and butyrate were 20.9%, 27.4%, and 32.7% greater in RE compared with BR, respectively. Lower CH<sub>4</sub> levels in BR and the greater VFA concentrations in the RE validated the ability of the method to differentiate breath from ruminal eructed VOC. Our study established a method to distinguish and separately collect BR and RE samples in dairy cows. This advance shows the potential to use breathomics as a reliable and noninvasive tool for metabolic assessments in ruminant research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 438-443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A sampling method for differentiating breath and ruminal exhaled volatile organic compounds in dairy cows using methane as a marker\",\"authors\":\"M.A. Barrientos-Blanco ,&nbsp;U. Arshad ,&nbsp;S. Giannoukos ,&nbsp;M.Z. Islam ,&nbsp;C. Kunz ,&nbsp;R. Peng ,&nbsp;S.E. Räisänen ,&nbsp;R. Zenobi ,&nbsp;M. Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Frequent eructation in ruminant animals results in an exhaled blend of ruminal eructed and breath volatile organic compounds (VOC). The physiological distinction between the gas sources can limit the applicability of breath metabolomics (or breathomics) in describing the metabolic phenotype of cows. The objective of this study was to establish a benchmark sampling method for collecting breath samples in dairy cows while they were not eructating. Twelve multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows were enrolled to collect (1) breath (BR; bloodborne VOC exchanged at the lungs) and (2) ruminal exhaled (RE; a mixture of VOC from ruminal eructation and breaths during eructations) samples. Gas samples were collected using a head chamber (GreenFeed system) with real-time CH<sub>4</sub> readings. By monitoring eructation events, a threshold of &lt;150 mV CH<sub>4</sub> was set to sample breath, and &gt;250 mV was used to collect BR and RE. Both samples were analyzed using secondary electrospray ionization-high resolution MS (SESI-MS) and GC. Implementing CH<sub>4</sub> as a marker resulted in 80% lower CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations in BR compared with RE. Analysis using SESI-MS revealed a total of 324 and 242 features consistently identified across all periods of the study in [M-H]<sup>−</sup> and [M+H]<sup>+</sup> MS ion mode, respectively, for BR and RE. In BR, 18 features exhibited greater concentrations, whereas 8 had a tendency to have greater concentrations compared with RE. In contrast, RE revealed 51 features with greater concentrations, and 13 with a tendency for greater concentrations compared with BR. Ruminal VFA acetate, propionate, and butyrate were 20.9%, 27.4%, and 32.7% greater in RE compared with BR, respectively. Lower CH<sub>4</sub> levels in BR and the greater VFA concentrations in the RE validated the ability of the method to differentiate breath from ruminal eructed VOC. Our study established a method to distinguish and separately collect BR and RE samples in dairy cows. This advance shows the potential to use breathomics as a reliable and noninvasive tool for metabolic assessments in ruminant research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 438-443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225000432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910225000432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反刍动物频繁的排泄会导致呼出的瘤胃排出物和呼出的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)混合在一起。气源之间的生理差异可能会限制呼吸代谢组学(或呼吸组学)在描述奶牛代谢表型中的适用性。本研究的目的是建立一种基准采样方法,用于在奶牛未受教育时收集其呼吸样本。选取12头哺乳期中期的多产荷斯坦奶牛进行(1)呼吸(BR)采集;(2)瘤胃呼出物(RE;来自瘤胃分泌物和分泌物期间呼吸的挥发性有机化合物的混合物)样品。气体样品采集使用头部室(GreenFeed系统)与实时CH4读数。通过监测呼吸事件,设定150 mV CH4阈值采集呼吸样本,250 mV CH4阈值采集BR和RE样本。两种样本均采用二次电喷雾电离-高分辨率质谱(SESI-MS)和气相色谱(GC)分析。实现甲烷作为标记导致CH4浓度与再保险BR相比低80%。分析使用SESI-MS公布了324年和242年的总特性一致确认在所有时期的研究(mh)−和女士[M + H) +离子模式,分别在BR BR和再保险。18特性表现出更大的浓度,而8有一个倾向于更大的浓度与再保险。相比之下,重新显示51特性与更大的浓度,与BR相比,13的浓度有更高的趋势。RE组瘤胃VFA乙酸、丙酸和丁酸分别比BR组高20.9%、27.4%和32.7%。BR中较低的CH4水平和RE中较高的VFA浓度验证了该方法区分呼气和瘤胃排出VOC的能力。本研究建立了奶牛BR和RE样品的区分和分离采集方法。这一进展表明,在反刍动物研究中,呼吸组学有可能成为一种可靠的、无创的代谢评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A sampling method for differentiating breath and ruminal exhaled volatile organic compounds in dairy cows using methane as a marker
Frequent eructation in ruminant animals results in an exhaled blend of ruminal eructed and breath volatile organic compounds (VOC). The physiological distinction between the gas sources can limit the applicability of breath metabolomics (or breathomics) in describing the metabolic phenotype of cows. The objective of this study was to establish a benchmark sampling method for collecting breath samples in dairy cows while they were not eructating. Twelve multiparous mid-lactation Holstein cows were enrolled to collect (1) breath (BR; bloodborne VOC exchanged at the lungs) and (2) ruminal exhaled (RE; a mixture of VOC from ruminal eructation and breaths during eructations) samples. Gas samples were collected using a head chamber (GreenFeed system) with real-time CH4 readings. By monitoring eructation events, a threshold of <150 mV CH4 was set to sample breath, and >250 mV was used to collect BR and RE. Both samples were analyzed using secondary electrospray ionization-high resolution MS (SESI-MS) and GC. Implementing CH4 as a marker resulted in 80% lower CH4 concentrations in BR compared with RE. Analysis using SESI-MS revealed a total of 324 and 242 features consistently identified across all periods of the study in [M-H] and [M+H]+ MS ion mode, respectively, for BR and RE. In BR, 18 features exhibited greater concentrations, whereas 8 had a tendency to have greater concentrations compared with RE. In contrast, RE revealed 51 features with greater concentrations, and 13 with a tendency for greater concentrations compared with BR. Ruminal VFA acetate, propionate, and butyrate were 20.9%, 27.4%, and 32.7% greater in RE compared with BR, respectively. Lower CH4 levels in BR and the greater VFA concentrations in the RE validated the ability of the method to differentiate breath from ruminal eructed VOC. Our study established a method to distinguish and separately collect BR and RE samples in dairy cows. This advance shows the potential to use breathomics as a reliable and noninvasive tool for metabolic assessments in ruminant research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信