P. Silva Boloña , A. Valldecabres , C. Clabby , P. Dillon
{"title":"比较四分之一的奶牛在干燥时接受抗生素治疗与只有四分之一的奶牛受到高体细胞计数或乳腺内感染的所有四分之一的抗生素治疗","authors":"P. Silva Boloña , A. Valldecabres , C. Clabby , P. Dillon","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate, on cows with only one quarter affected at dry-off with an IMI, a high SCC (>200,000 cells/mL), or both, the impact of treating with an antibiotic plus internal teat sealant only the quarter affected (treating unaffected quarters with teat sealant alone; SelectAB) versus all quarters (AllAB) on subsequent lactation SCC (analyzed as log<sub>10</sub> transformed SCC) and IMI (odds of cure [i.e., affected quarter at dry-off but not at calving]; and odds of healthy [i.e., not affected at dry-off and calving]). Ninety-six multiparous cows from 3 research herds were randomly assigned to SelectAB or AllAB. Linear and logistic regression mixed models were used for data analysis. Cows assigned to AllAB had a 0.15 units lower log<sub>10</sub> SCC (95% CI = −0.19 to −0.11 log points) through the full subsequent lactation compared with SelectAB cows. The odds of cure for an affected quarter were similar for AllAB and SelectAB cows (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.27–2.20), but cows under AllAB had higher odds of having a healthy quarter shortly after calving compared with SelectAB cows (odds ratio = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.21–6.73). In conclusion, a reduced rate of healthy quarters (i.e., increased new infections any time from dry-off to shortly after calving), especially in quarters treated with internal teat sealant alone within an udder with one quarter affected with IMI, high SCC, or both at dry-off, may be a major barrier for the implementation of a quarter-based dry-off treatment approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 356-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing antibiotic treatment at dry-off on one quarter versus all quarters in cows with only one quarter affected with a high somatic cell count or an intramammary infection\",\"authors\":\"P. Silva Boloña , A. Valldecabres , C. Clabby , P. Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate, on cows with only one quarter affected at dry-off with an IMI, a high SCC (>200,000 cells/mL), or both, the impact of treating with an antibiotic plus internal teat sealant only the quarter affected (treating unaffected quarters with teat sealant alone; SelectAB) versus all quarters (AllAB) on subsequent lactation SCC (analyzed as log<sub>10</sub> transformed SCC) and IMI (odds of cure [i.e., affected quarter at dry-off but not at calving]; and odds of healthy [i.e., not affected at dry-off and calving]). Ninety-six multiparous cows from 3 research herds were randomly assigned to SelectAB or AllAB. Linear and logistic regression mixed models were used for data analysis. Cows assigned to AllAB had a 0.15 units lower log<sub>10</sub> SCC (95% CI = −0.19 to −0.11 log points) through the full subsequent lactation compared with SelectAB cows. The odds of cure for an affected quarter were similar for AllAB and SelectAB cows (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.27–2.20), but cows under AllAB had higher odds of having a healthy quarter shortly after calving compared with SelectAB cows (odds ratio = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.21–6.73). In conclusion, a reduced rate of healthy quarters (i.e., increased new infections any time from dry-off to shortly after calving), especially in quarters treated with internal teat sealant alone within an udder with one quarter affected with IMI, high SCC, or both at dry-off, may be a major barrier for the implementation of a quarter-based dry-off treatment approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 356-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224001972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224001972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项随机对照研究的目的是评估在干干时只有四分之一的奶牛受到IMI影响,高SCC (>200,000细胞/mL),或两者兼有,仅用抗生素加内部乳封剂治疗受影响的四分之一的影响(单独用乳封剂治疗未受影响的四分之一;SelectAB)与所有季度(AllAB)在随后的哺乳期鳞状细胞癌(分析为log10转化鳞状细胞癌)和IMI(治愈几率[即干干时受影响的季度,但不包括产犊时];健康的几率(即,不受干枯期和产犊期的影响)。选取3个研究群的96头产牛,随机分为SelectAB组和AllAB组。采用线性和逻辑回归混合模型进行数据分析。与使用SelectAB的奶牛相比,使用AllAB的奶牛在整个泌乳期间的log10 SCC降低了0.15个单位(95% CI = - 0.19至- 0.11个对数点)。AllAB奶牛和SelectAB奶牛受影响的四分之一的治愈几率相似(优势比= 0.77;95% CI = 0.27-2.20),但与SelectAB奶牛相比,AllAB奶牛在产犊后不久拥有健康季度的几率更高(优势比= 2.86;95% ci = 1.21-6.73)。综上所述,健康区比率降低(即,从干乳期到产犊后不久的任何时间,新感染增加),特别是在仅在乳房内使用内部乳头密封剂处理的区,其中四分之一在干乳期受到IMI、高SCC或两者的影响,这可能是实施基于四分之一的干乳治疗方法的主要障碍。
Comparing antibiotic treatment at dry-off on one quarter versus all quarters in cows with only one quarter affected with a high somatic cell count or an intramammary infection
The aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate, on cows with only one quarter affected at dry-off with an IMI, a high SCC (>200,000 cells/mL), or both, the impact of treating with an antibiotic plus internal teat sealant only the quarter affected (treating unaffected quarters with teat sealant alone; SelectAB) versus all quarters (AllAB) on subsequent lactation SCC (analyzed as log10 transformed SCC) and IMI (odds of cure [i.e., affected quarter at dry-off but not at calving]; and odds of healthy [i.e., not affected at dry-off and calving]). Ninety-six multiparous cows from 3 research herds were randomly assigned to SelectAB or AllAB. Linear and logistic regression mixed models were used for data analysis. Cows assigned to AllAB had a 0.15 units lower log10 SCC (95% CI = −0.19 to −0.11 log points) through the full subsequent lactation compared with SelectAB cows. The odds of cure for an affected quarter were similar for AllAB and SelectAB cows (odds ratio = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.27–2.20), but cows under AllAB had higher odds of having a healthy quarter shortly after calving compared with SelectAB cows (odds ratio = 2.86; 95% CI = 1.21–6.73). In conclusion, a reduced rate of healthy quarters (i.e., increased new infections any time from dry-off to shortly after calving), especially in quarters treated with internal teat sealant alone within an udder with one quarter affected with IMI, high SCC, or both at dry-off, may be a major barrier for the implementation of a quarter-based dry-off treatment approach.