Fengliang Tang , Peng Zeng , Yuanyuan Guo , Yingning Shen , Lei Wang , Kaixin Liu , Longhao Zhang
{"title":"基于深度学习的京津冀城市群生态弹性时空动态及驱动机制研究","authors":"Fengliang Tang , Peng Zeng , Yuanyuan Guo , Yingning Shen , Lei Wang , Kaixin Liu , Longhao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban agglomerations face escalating ecological challenges due to rapid urbanization and climate change, yet the dynamic spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecological resilience remain underexplored. This study examines the ecological resilience of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region from 2010 to 2020, integrating a deep learning approach using the Transformer-based TSAR-SHAP model with spatiotemporal analysis of a 1 km × 1 km grid dataset. Ecological resilience is assessed from morphology, density, and coordination dimension, alongside socio-economic, environmental, and climatic factors. The findings reveal a marked decline in ecological resilience levels between 2010 and 2015, particularly in urban cores like Beijing and Tianjin, driven by urban sprawl, PM2.5 pollution, and CO₂ emissions. A partial recovery from 2015 to 2020 reflects the positive impact of coordinated environmental policies, including air pollution control and ecological restoration initiatives. Spatially, urban centers exhibited persistent ecological stress due to high population density and built-up area expansion, while rural areas in northern Hebei displayed higher resilience supported by natural ecosystems and favorable climatic conditions. The TSAR-SHAP model captured the temporal shift from anthropogenic to climatic drivers and revealed significant spatial heterogeneity. These findings highlight the need for spatiotemporal differentiated strategies to balance urban growth with ecological preservation and provide actionable insights for sustainable regional development in rapidly urbanizing areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 102436"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms of ecological resilience in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: A deep learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Fengliang Tang , Peng Zeng , Yuanyuan Guo , Yingning Shen , Lei Wang , Kaixin Liu , Longhao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban agglomerations face escalating ecological challenges due to rapid urbanization and climate change, yet the dynamic spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecological resilience remain underexplored. This study examines the ecological resilience of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region from 2010 to 2020, integrating a deep learning approach using the Transformer-based TSAR-SHAP model with spatiotemporal analysis of a 1 km × 1 km grid dataset. Ecological resilience is assessed from morphology, density, and coordination dimension, alongside socio-economic, environmental, and climatic factors. The findings reveal a marked decline in ecological resilience levels between 2010 and 2015, particularly in urban cores like Beijing and Tianjin, driven by urban sprawl, PM2.5 pollution, and CO₂ emissions. A partial recovery from 2015 to 2020 reflects the positive impact of coordinated environmental policies, including air pollution control and ecological restoration initiatives. Spatially, urban centers exhibited persistent ecological stress due to high population density and built-up area expansion, while rural areas in northern Hebei displayed higher resilience supported by natural ecosystems and favorable climatic conditions. The TSAR-SHAP model captured the temporal shift from anthropogenic to climatic drivers and revealed significant spatial heterogeneity. These findings highlight the need for spatiotemporal differentiated strategies to balance urban growth with ecological preservation and provide actionable insights for sustainable regional development in rapidly urbanizing areas.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Climate\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Climate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209552500152X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209552500152X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
快速城市化和气候变化使城市群面临着不断升级的生态挑战,但生态弹性的动态时空格局和驱动因素仍未得到充分探讨。利用基于transformer的TSAR-SHAP模型的深度学习方法,结合1 km × 1 km网格数据集的时空分析,对2010 - 2020年京津冀地区的生态恢复力进行了研究。生态恢复力从形态、密度和协调维度以及社会经济、环境和气候因素进行评估。研究结果显示,在城市扩张、PM2.5污染和二氧化碳排放的推动下,2010年至2015年间,生态恢复能力水平显著下降,尤其是在北京和天津等核心城市。2015年至2020年的部分恢复反映了协调的环境政策的积极影响,包括空气污染控制和生态恢复举措。空间上,城市中心区由于人口密度高和建成区扩张而表现出持续的生态压力,而冀北农村在自然生态系统和有利气候条件的支持下表现出较高的恢复能力。TSAR-SHAP模式捕获了从人为驱动因子到气候驱动因子的时间变化,并揭示了显著的空间异质性。这些研究结果表明,在快速城市化地区,需要采取时空差异策略来平衡城市增长与生态保护,并为可持续区域发展提供可操作的见解。
Decoding the spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms of ecological resilience in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration: A deep learning approach
Urban agglomerations face escalating ecological challenges due to rapid urbanization and climate change, yet the dynamic spatiotemporal patterns and drivers of ecological resilience remain underexplored. This study examines the ecological resilience of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region from 2010 to 2020, integrating a deep learning approach using the Transformer-based TSAR-SHAP model with spatiotemporal analysis of a 1 km × 1 km grid dataset. Ecological resilience is assessed from morphology, density, and coordination dimension, alongside socio-economic, environmental, and climatic factors. The findings reveal a marked decline in ecological resilience levels between 2010 and 2015, particularly in urban cores like Beijing and Tianjin, driven by urban sprawl, PM2.5 pollution, and CO₂ emissions. A partial recovery from 2015 to 2020 reflects the positive impact of coordinated environmental policies, including air pollution control and ecological restoration initiatives. Spatially, urban centers exhibited persistent ecological stress due to high population density and built-up area expansion, while rural areas in northern Hebei displayed higher resilience supported by natural ecosystems and favorable climatic conditions. The TSAR-SHAP model captured the temporal shift from anthropogenic to climatic drivers and revealed significant spatial heterogeneity. These findings highlight the need for spatiotemporal differentiated strategies to balance urban growth with ecological preservation and provide actionable insights for sustainable regional development in rapidly urbanizing areas.
期刊介绍:
Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following:
Urban meteorology and climate[...]
Urban environmental pollution[...]
Adaptation to global change[...]
Urban economic and social issues[...]
Research Approaches[...]