汽车用电池从生产到回收的全球变暖潜力

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Clotilde Robert , Alexandre Ravey , Raphaël Perey , Daniel Hissel
{"title":"汽车用电池从生产到回收的全球变暖潜力","authors":"Clotilde Robert ,&nbsp;Alexandre Ravey ,&nbsp;Raphaël Perey ,&nbsp;Daniel Hissel","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.116777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies.</div><div>The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life.</div><div>The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 116777"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global warming potential of batteries for vehicle applications, from production to recycling\",\"authors\":\"Clotilde Robert ,&nbsp;Alexandre Ravey ,&nbsp;Raphaël Perey ,&nbsp;Daniel Hissel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.est.2025.116777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies.</div><div>The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life.</div><div>The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25014902\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25014902","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对交通运输中常用的六种电池化学成分(pba、NMC、LFP、NCA、LTO和lmo)的生命周期评估(LCA)研究进行了结构化的综述和综合。这项工作不是进行新的LCA,而是汇编和分析来自多个来源的数据,以建立一个评估这些技术的全球变暖潜能值(GWP)的比较框架。该分析侧重于关键生命周期阶段产生的排放,包括材料提取、电池生产、运输、回收和寿命结束,同时通过数据质量指标整合不确定性。结果表明,锂基电池的平均GWP为110.3 kgCO2eq/kWh,回收过程减少了约39.7%的排放量。铅酸电池的GWP值较低(67.7 kgCO2eq/kWh),但在能量密度和循环寿命方面,铅酸电池在技术上优于锂基化学电池。研究结果强调了在选择电池时需要采用整体方法,强调了在评估环境影响时整合技术性能指标(如能量密度、充放电周期和可回收性)的重要性。这项研究支持了生态高效储能解决方案的开发,并为可持续交通应用提供了明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global warming potential of batteries for vehicle applications, from production to recycling
This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies.
The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO2eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO2eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life.
The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信