Clotilde Robert , Alexandre Ravey , Raphaël Perey , Daniel Hissel
{"title":"汽车用电池从生产到回收的全球变暖潜力","authors":"Clotilde Robert , Alexandre Ravey , Raphaël Perey , Daniel Hissel","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.116777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies.</div><div>The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life.</div><div>The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 116777"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global warming potential of batteries for vehicle applications, from production to recycling\",\"authors\":\"Clotilde Robert , Alexandre Ravey , Raphaël Perey , Daniel Hissel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.est.2025.116777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies.</div><div>The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life.</div><div>The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25014902\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25014902","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global warming potential of batteries for vehicle applications, from production to recycling
This study provides a structured review and synthesis of existing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies on six battery chemistries—PbA, NMC, LFP, NCA, LTO, and LMO—commonly used in transportation applications. Rather than conducting a new LCA, this work compiles and analyzes data from multiple sources to establish a comparative framework for assessing the global warming potential (GWP) of these technologies.
The analysis focuses on emissions generated across key life cycle stages, including material extraction, battery production, transportation, recycling, and end-of-life, while integrating uncertainty through a data quality indicator. Results indicate that the average GWP for lithium-based batteries is 110.3 kgCO2eq/kWh, with recycling processes reducing emissions by approximately 39.7 %. Lead-acid batteries exhibit a lower GWP (67.7 kgCO2eq/kWh) but are technically outperformed by lithium-based chemistries in energy density and cycle life.
The findings highlight the need for a holistic approach in battery selection, emphasizing the importance of integrating technical performance indicators such as energy density, charge/discharge cycles, and recyclability when assessing environmental impact. This study supports the development of eco-efficient energy storage solutions and informed decision-making for sustainable transportation applications.
期刊介绍:
Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.