肩部运动学和肌肉协同在多平面肱骨升降

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Masahiro Kuniki , Hikaru Yokoyama , Rei Konishi , Yoshitaka Iwamoto , Daiki Yamagiwa , Daisuke Kuwahara , Tsuzumi Morine , Nobuhiro Kito
{"title":"肩部运动学和肌肉协同在多平面肱骨升降","authors":"Masahiro Kuniki ,&nbsp;Hikaru Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Rei Konishi ,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Iwamoto ,&nbsp;Daiki Yamagiwa ,&nbsp;Daisuke Kuwahara ,&nbsp;Tsuzumi Morine ,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Kito","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shoulder kinematics and muscle activity vary depending on the elevation plane of the upper limb. However, how muscle coordination, which plays a crucial role in controlling shoulder kinematics, differs among elevation planes remains unclear. This study compared shoulder kinematics, muscle synergies, and muscle activation levels across different elevation planes to better understand the neuromuscular mechanisms underlying shoulder kinematics. Shoulder kinematics and muscle activity were recorded during three upper limb elevation tasks (sagittal, scapular, and frontal plane elevation) in 12 subjects (7 males and 5 females). Muscle synergies were extracted using nonnegative matrix factorization, and individual muscle activity levels were calculated as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction. Glenohumeral elevation was greatest during the sagittal plane elevation task and smallest during the frontal plane elevation task (maximum difference of 14.1°). The differences in kinematics among these elevation planes were suggested to be attributable to the early-stage activity level during elevation of one of the two extracted muscle synergies—specifically, the synergy believed to contribute to humeral head stabilization—and the activation amplitude of the anterior deltoid. Differences in scapular kinematics among three elevation plane tasks could not be explained by variations in muscle synergies but were instead suggested to result primarily from differences in the activation amplitudes of the three parts of the trapezius. To results suggest that shoulder kinematics are controlled by subtle changes in muscle synergy activation patterns and individual muscle activation levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 112735"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shoulder kinematics and muscle synergy during multi-plane humeral elevation and lowering\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Kuniki ,&nbsp;Hikaru Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Rei Konishi ,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Iwamoto ,&nbsp;Daiki Yamagiwa ,&nbsp;Daisuke Kuwahara ,&nbsp;Tsuzumi Morine ,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Kito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shoulder kinematics and muscle activity vary depending on the elevation plane of the upper limb. However, how muscle coordination, which plays a crucial role in controlling shoulder kinematics, differs among elevation planes remains unclear. This study compared shoulder kinematics, muscle synergies, and muscle activation levels across different elevation planes to better understand the neuromuscular mechanisms underlying shoulder kinematics. Shoulder kinematics and muscle activity were recorded during three upper limb elevation tasks (sagittal, scapular, and frontal plane elevation) in 12 subjects (7 males and 5 females). Muscle synergies were extracted using nonnegative matrix factorization, and individual muscle activity levels were calculated as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction. Glenohumeral elevation was greatest during the sagittal plane elevation task and smallest during the frontal plane elevation task (maximum difference of 14.1°). The differences in kinematics among these elevation planes were suggested to be attributable to the early-stage activity level during elevation of one of the two extracted muscle synergies—specifically, the synergy believed to contribute to humeral head stabilization—and the activation amplitude of the anterior deltoid. Differences in scapular kinematics among three elevation plane tasks could not be explained by variations in muscle synergies but were instead suggested to result primarily from differences in the activation amplitudes of the three parts of the trapezius. To results suggest that shoulder kinematics are controlled by subtle changes in muscle synergy activation patterns and individual muscle activation levels.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025002477\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025002477","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肩部的运动学和肌肉活动取决于上肢的仰角平面。然而,在控制肩部运动中起关键作用的肌肉协调如何在不同的仰角平面上不同仍不清楚。本研究比较了不同仰角平面的肩关节运动学、肌肉协同作用和肌肉激活水平,以更好地理解肩关节运动学背后的神经肌肉机制。记录12名受试者(7名男性和5名女性)在三个上肢提升任务(矢状面、肩胛骨面和额平面提升)期间的肩部运动学和肌肉活动。使用非负矩阵分解提取肌肉协同作用,并计算个体肌肉活动水平作为最大自愿收缩的百分比。矢状面抬高时肱骨盂上凸最大,额面抬高时最小(最大差值为14.1°)。这些抬高平面之间的运动学差异被认为是由于两个提取的肌肉协同作用中的一个在抬高时的早期活动水平(具体来说,协同作用被认为有助于肱骨头稳定)和前三角肌的激活幅度。三种仰角平面任务的肩胛骨运动学差异不能用肌肉协同作用的变化来解释,而是认为主要是由斜方肌三个部分的激活幅度差异造成的。结果表明,肩部运动是由肌肉协同激活模式和个体肌肉激活水平的微妙变化控制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shoulder kinematics and muscle synergy during multi-plane humeral elevation and lowering
Shoulder kinematics and muscle activity vary depending on the elevation plane of the upper limb. However, how muscle coordination, which plays a crucial role in controlling shoulder kinematics, differs among elevation planes remains unclear. This study compared shoulder kinematics, muscle synergies, and muscle activation levels across different elevation planes to better understand the neuromuscular mechanisms underlying shoulder kinematics. Shoulder kinematics and muscle activity were recorded during three upper limb elevation tasks (sagittal, scapular, and frontal plane elevation) in 12 subjects (7 males and 5 females). Muscle synergies were extracted using nonnegative matrix factorization, and individual muscle activity levels were calculated as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction. Glenohumeral elevation was greatest during the sagittal plane elevation task and smallest during the frontal plane elevation task (maximum difference of 14.1°). The differences in kinematics among these elevation planes were suggested to be attributable to the early-stage activity level during elevation of one of the two extracted muscle synergies—specifically, the synergy believed to contribute to humeral head stabilization—and the activation amplitude of the anterior deltoid. Differences in scapular kinematics among three elevation plane tasks could not be explained by variations in muscle synergies but were instead suggested to result primarily from differences in the activation amplitudes of the three parts of the trapezius. To results suggest that shoulder kinematics are controlled by subtle changes in muscle synergy activation patterns and individual muscle activation levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信