现代晚期的城市团结:洛杉矶和阿姆斯特丹有意义的互动空间

IF 4.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Elena Ponzoni, Tara Rose Fiorito, Halleh Ghorashi
{"title":"现代晚期的城市团结:洛杉矶和阿姆斯特丹有意义的互动空间","authors":"Elena Ponzoni, Tara Rose Fiorito, Halleh Ghorashi","doi":"10.1177/00420980251329271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Late modern urban spaces marked by heterogeneity, forced proximity, intersecting layers of difference and normalised structures of inequality and marginalisation, require rethinking the conditions for an urban ethics of solidarity. Such an ethics of solidarity needs to go beyond notions of large collective movements based on shared values or claims and beyond demarcated communities. We explore the role of personal connections centred on meaningful engagement across difference in creating reflexivity and addressing how structural inequalities affect lived experiences of marginalisation and harm. Using two empirical examples of intergroup and intragroup connectivity in contemporary late modern urban spaces (Los Angeles and Amsterdam), we show how the connections needed to address these problems can arise in interspaces for non-hierarchical engagement across difference. We argue that these interspaces, where people explore layered relations and differences, can become the basis of a new urban ethics of solidarity.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban solidarities in late modern times: Interspaces for meaningful engagement in Los Angeles and Amsterdam\",\"authors\":\"Elena Ponzoni, Tara Rose Fiorito, Halleh Ghorashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00420980251329271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Late modern urban spaces marked by heterogeneity, forced proximity, intersecting layers of difference and normalised structures of inequality and marginalisation, require rethinking the conditions for an urban ethics of solidarity. Such an ethics of solidarity needs to go beyond notions of large collective movements based on shared values or claims and beyond demarcated communities. We explore the role of personal connections centred on meaningful engagement across difference in creating reflexivity and addressing how structural inequalities affect lived experiences of marginalisation and harm. Using two empirical examples of intergroup and intragroup connectivity in contemporary late modern urban spaces (Los Angeles and Amsterdam), we show how the connections needed to address these problems can arise in interspaces for non-hierarchical engagement across difference. We argue that these interspaces, where people explore layered relations and differences, can become the basis of a new urban ethics of solidarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Studies\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251329271\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251329271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代晚期城市空间的特点是异质性、迫近性、相互交叉的差异层以及不平等和边缘化的正常化结构,这需要重新思考城市团结伦理的条件。这种团结的伦理需要超越基于共同价值或要求的大规模集体运动的概念,也需要超越划分的社区。我们探讨了以跨差异的有意义参与为中心的个人联系在创造反身性和解决结构性不平等如何影响边缘化和伤害的生活经历方面的作用。通过当代晚期城市空间(洛杉矶和阿姆斯特丹)中群体间和群体内连通性的两个实证例子,我们展示了解决这些问题所需的连接如何在跨差异的非等级参与的空间中出现。我们认为,这些人们探索分层关系和差异的空间可以成为新的城市团结伦理的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urban solidarities in late modern times: Interspaces for meaningful engagement in Los Angeles and Amsterdam
Late modern urban spaces marked by heterogeneity, forced proximity, intersecting layers of difference and normalised structures of inequality and marginalisation, require rethinking the conditions for an urban ethics of solidarity. Such an ethics of solidarity needs to go beyond notions of large collective movements based on shared values or claims and beyond demarcated communities. We explore the role of personal connections centred on meaningful engagement across difference in creating reflexivity and addressing how structural inequalities affect lived experiences of marginalisation and harm. Using two empirical examples of intergroup and intragroup connectivity in contemporary late modern urban spaces (Los Angeles and Amsterdam), we show how the connections needed to address these problems can arise in interspaces for non-hierarchical engagement across difference. We argue that these interspaces, where people explore layered relations and differences, can become the basis of a new urban ethics of solidarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信