Septimiu Murgu,Alexander C Chen,Christopher R Gilbert,Daniel H Sterman,Damaris Pederson,Samaan Rafeq,Balaji Laxmanan,Michael L Schwiers,Jaime Connelly,Heather L Benz,Kazuhiro Yasufuku,Gerard A Silvestri,
{"title":"机器人辅助支气管镜安全性和诊断结果的前瞻性多中心评估:机器人指导下肺肿瘤评估(TARGET)试验的经支气管活检结果","authors":"Septimiu Murgu,Alexander C Chen,Christopher R Gilbert,Daniel H Sterman,Damaris Pederson,Samaan Rafeq,Balaji Laxmanan,Michael L Schwiers,Jaime Connelly,Heather L Benz,Kazuhiro Yasufuku,Gerard A Silvestri,","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nIt remains challenging to safely and reliably biopsy peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is gaining adoption for navigation to PPLs. However, evidence from large studies remains limited.\r\n\r\nRESEARCH QUESTION\r\nWhat is the clinical safety, navigational success, and diagnostic yield of RAB for biopsy of PPLs in a broad range of patients in a real-world setting?\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN AND METHODS\r\nThis multicenter, prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients >21 years old with 8-50 mm lung lesions requiring bronchoscopic diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the following device- or procedure-related events: (1) pneumothorax requiring intervention; (2) bleeding requiring intervention; or (3) respiratory failure. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, procedure time, pneumothoraces, radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) confirmation, conversion to an alternative biopsy procedure, complications, and diagnostic yield (DY).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 715 patients at 21 sites, 679 met study criteria and underwent RAB (mean age 68.7, 55.4% female, 86.5% White, 77.5% current/past tobacco users). Mean (range) lesion size was 20.9 (7.0-63.0) mm; median (IQR) distance from pleural surface was 5 (0-16) mm. Most lesions were solid (n=587; 86.6%) and within the outer two-thirds of the lung (n=593; 87.5%). The primary endpoint was observed in 26 (3.8%) patients (19 pneumothorax, 7 bleeding, 0 respiratory failure). Users reported that RAB reached the lesion in 670/679 (98.7%) cases, and lesion location was confirmed with R-EBUS in 607/662 (91.7%) cases; sampling through the bronchoscope was performed in 675/679 (99.4%) cases. Prevalence of malignancy was 64.1% through 12 months. Adjudicated DY was 61.6% when calculated with the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) definition for strict reporting criteria. Sensitivity for malignancy was 78.8%.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nThis largest multicenter prospective study of RAB to date demonstrated that RAB-guided sampling of PPLs is safe and compares favorably to results from sizable non-robotic bronchoscopy studies.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nNCT04182815.","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Safety and Diagnostic Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy: Results of the Transbronchial Biopsy Assisted by Robot Guidance in the Evaluation of Tumors of the Lung (TARGET) Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Septimiu Murgu,Alexander C Chen,Christopher R Gilbert,Daniel H Sterman,Damaris Pederson,Samaan Rafeq,Balaji Laxmanan,Michael L Schwiers,Jaime Connelly,Heather L Benz,Kazuhiro Yasufuku,Gerard A Silvestri,\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.04.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nIt remains challenging to safely and reliably biopsy peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is gaining adoption for navigation to PPLs. However, evidence from large studies remains limited.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESEARCH QUESTION\\r\\nWhat is the clinical safety, navigational success, and diagnostic yield of RAB for biopsy of PPLs in a broad range of patients in a real-world setting?\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN AND METHODS\\r\\nThis multicenter, prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients >21 years old with 8-50 mm lung lesions requiring bronchoscopic diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the following device- or procedure-related events: (1) pneumothorax requiring intervention; (2) bleeding requiring intervention; or (3) respiratory failure. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, procedure time, pneumothoraces, radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) confirmation, conversion to an alternative biopsy procedure, complications, and diagnostic yield (DY).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong 715 patients at 21 sites, 679 met study criteria and underwent RAB (mean age 68.7, 55.4% female, 86.5% White, 77.5% current/past tobacco users). Mean (range) lesion size was 20.9 (7.0-63.0) mm; median (IQR) distance from pleural surface was 5 (0-16) mm. Most lesions were solid (n=587; 86.6%) and within the outer two-thirds of the lung (n=593; 87.5%). The primary endpoint was observed in 26 (3.8%) patients (19 pneumothorax, 7 bleeding, 0 respiratory failure). Users reported that RAB reached the lesion in 670/679 (98.7%) cases, and lesion location was confirmed with R-EBUS in 607/662 (91.7%) cases; sampling through the bronchoscope was performed in 675/679 (99.4%) cases. Prevalence of malignancy was 64.1% through 12 months. Adjudicated DY was 61.6% when calculated with the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) definition for strict reporting criteria. Sensitivity for malignancy was 78.8%.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERPRETATION\\r\\nThis largest multicenter prospective study of RAB to date demonstrated that RAB-guided sampling of PPLs is safe and compares favorably to results from sizable non-robotic bronchoscopy studies.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER\\r\\nNCT04182815.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.04.022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.04.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation of Safety and Diagnostic Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy: Results of the Transbronchial Biopsy Assisted by Robot Guidance in the Evaluation of Tumors of the Lung (TARGET) Trial.
BACKGROUND
It remains challenging to safely and reliably biopsy peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) is gaining adoption for navigation to PPLs. However, evidence from large studies remains limited.
RESEARCH QUESTION
What is the clinical safety, navigational success, and diagnostic yield of RAB for biopsy of PPLs in a broad range of patients in a real-world setting?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
This multicenter, prospective, single-arm study enrolled patients >21 years old with 8-50 mm lung lesions requiring bronchoscopic diagnosis. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the following device- or procedure-related events: (1) pneumothorax requiring intervention; (2) bleeding requiring intervention; or (3) respiratory failure. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint, procedure time, pneumothoraces, radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) confirmation, conversion to an alternative biopsy procedure, complications, and diagnostic yield (DY).
RESULTS
Among 715 patients at 21 sites, 679 met study criteria and underwent RAB (mean age 68.7, 55.4% female, 86.5% White, 77.5% current/past tobacco users). Mean (range) lesion size was 20.9 (7.0-63.0) mm; median (IQR) distance from pleural surface was 5 (0-16) mm. Most lesions were solid (n=587; 86.6%) and within the outer two-thirds of the lung (n=593; 87.5%). The primary endpoint was observed in 26 (3.8%) patients (19 pneumothorax, 7 bleeding, 0 respiratory failure). Users reported that RAB reached the lesion in 670/679 (98.7%) cases, and lesion location was confirmed with R-EBUS in 607/662 (91.7%) cases; sampling through the bronchoscope was performed in 675/679 (99.4%) cases. Prevalence of malignancy was 64.1% through 12 months. Adjudicated DY was 61.6% when calculated with the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) definition for strict reporting criteria. Sensitivity for malignancy was 78.8%.
INTERPRETATION
This largest multicenter prospective study of RAB to date demonstrated that RAB-guided sampling of PPLs is safe and compares favorably to results from sizable non-robotic bronchoscopy studies.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
NCT04182815.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.