探讨内容农场与正规新闻机构的互动元话语

IF 1.5 3区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yu-Yun Chang
{"title":"探讨内容农场与正规新闻机构的互动元话语","authors":"Yu-Yun Chang","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Research on the content of articles from content farms and formal news reports remains limited. This study examines differences between the two types of news agencies regarding interactional metadiscourse, aiming to explore the rhetorical devices employed by writers to interact with readers. We retrieved 86 Chinese health-related news articles from both content farms and formal news agencies to compile two corpora for quantitative and qualitative analysis. In general, content farm articles employ fewer boosters but more self-mentions than formal news reports. Furthermore, distinct writing styles between the two types of agencies are observed. For instance, content farm articles tend to adopt a more colloquial style, emphasise balanced writer–reader interaction, and highlight the importance of the argument. In contrast, formal news articles prefer a more formal tone, encourage readers to take action, and emphasise the severity of circumstances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"35 2","pages":"852-862"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Interactional Metadiscourse in Content Farms and Formal News Agencies\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Yun Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijal.12657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Research on the content of articles from content farms and formal news reports remains limited. This study examines differences between the two types of news agencies regarding interactional metadiscourse, aiming to explore the rhetorical devices employed by writers to interact with readers. We retrieved 86 Chinese health-related news articles from both content farms and formal news agencies to compile two corpora for quantitative and qualitative analysis. In general, content farm articles employ fewer boosters but more self-mentions than formal news reports. Furthermore, distinct writing styles between the two types of agencies are observed. For instance, content farm articles tend to adopt a more colloquial style, emphasise balanced writer–reader interaction, and highlight the importance of the argument. In contrast, formal news articles prefer a more formal tone, encourage readers to take action, and emphasise the severity of circumstances.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"852-862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12657\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对内容农场和正式新闻报道中文章内容的研究仍然有限。本研究考察了两类新闻机构在互动元语篇方面的差异,旨在探讨作者与读者互动时所使用的修辞手段。我们从内容农场和正规新闻机构检索了86篇中国健康相关新闻文章,编制了两个语料库进行定量和定性分析。一般来说,内容农场文章比正式的新闻报道使用更少的助推器,但更多的是自我提及。此外,两类机构之间的写作风格也截然不同。例如,内容农场文章倾向于采用更口语化的风格,强调作者与读者之间的平衡互动,并强调论点的重要性。相比之下,正式的新闻文章喜欢更正式的语气,鼓励读者采取行动,并强调情况的严重性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Interactional Metadiscourse in Content Farms and Formal News Agencies

Research on the content of articles from content farms and formal news reports remains limited. This study examines differences between the two types of news agencies regarding interactional metadiscourse, aiming to explore the rhetorical devices employed by writers to interact with readers. We retrieved 86 Chinese health-related news articles from both content farms and formal news agencies to compile two corpora for quantitative and qualitative analysis. In general, content farm articles employ fewer boosters but more self-mentions than formal news reports. Furthermore, distinct writing styles between the two types of agencies are observed. For instance, content farm articles tend to adopt a more colloquial style, emphasise balanced writer–reader interaction, and highlight the importance of the argument. In contrast, formal news articles prefer a more formal tone, encourage readers to take action, and emphasise the severity of circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信