Maartje Henderikx, Emmy Vrieling-Teunter, Francois Molin, Rob Nadolski
{"title":"网络高等教育中同伴反馈建模需要进行探索性研究","authors":"Maartje Henderikx, Emmy Vrieling-Teunter, Francois Molin, Rob Nadolski","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Peer feedback (PFB) is considered a reliable and beneficial method for supporting learning and interaction. However, PFB is a complex skill that needs explicit instruction through modelling. To leverage the positive effects, a theoretical and pedagogy-driven application of PFB - namely scaffolded PFB modelling - was integrated into an online higher education academic writing course. To address needs-driven modifications of PFB within this course, students were surveyed after course completion to provide insights into their additional supporting needs about PFB. In total, 173 students answered reflective questions and six students were interviewed. Their responses were analyzed using Atlas.ti. Analyses showed that the need for PFB modelling was especially shown in the phases of observation and emulation. Students indicated the need for examples, additional (step-by-step) instructional materials, and the opportunity for guided practice and additional teacher feedback. In addition, students also provided suggestions to improve the PFB process; most of these suggestions were related to the online aspect of the course and its negative influence on interaction possibilities, which impeded communication and the development of trust and relationships among students. These results demonstrate that a pedagogy-driven application of PFB in an online higher education course requires a needs-driven, context-dependent redesign of PFB assignment(s), especially in the observation- and emulation modelling phases with extra attention to interaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer feedback modelling needs in online higher education an exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"Maartje Henderikx, Emmy Vrieling-Teunter, Francois Molin, Rob Nadolski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Peer feedback (PFB) is considered a reliable and beneficial method for supporting learning and interaction. However, PFB is a complex skill that needs explicit instruction through modelling. To leverage the positive effects, a theoretical and pedagogy-driven application of PFB - namely scaffolded PFB modelling - was integrated into an online higher education academic writing course. To address needs-driven modifications of PFB within this course, students were surveyed after course completion to provide insights into their additional supporting needs about PFB. In total, 173 students answered reflective questions and six students were interviewed. Their responses were analyzed using Atlas.ti. Analyses showed that the need for PFB modelling was especially shown in the phases of observation and emulation. Students indicated the need for examples, additional (step-by-step) instructional materials, and the opportunity for guided practice and additional teacher feedback. In addition, students also provided suggestions to improve the PFB process; most of these suggestions were related to the online aspect of the course and its negative influence on interaction possibilities, which impeded communication and the development of trust and relationships among students. These results demonstrate that a pedagogy-driven application of PFB in an online higher education course requires a needs-driven, context-dependent redesign of PFB assignment(s), especially in the observation- and emulation modelling phases with extra attention to interaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peer feedback modelling needs in online higher education an exploratory study
Peer feedback (PFB) is considered a reliable and beneficial method for supporting learning and interaction. However, PFB is a complex skill that needs explicit instruction through modelling. To leverage the positive effects, a theoretical and pedagogy-driven application of PFB - namely scaffolded PFB modelling - was integrated into an online higher education academic writing course. To address needs-driven modifications of PFB within this course, students were surveyed after course completion to provide insights into their additional supporting needs about PFB. In total, 173 students answered reflective questions and six students were interviewed. Their responses were analyzed using Atlas.ti. Analyses showed that the need for PFB modelling was especially shown in the phases of observation and emulation. Students indicated the need for examples, additional (step-by-step) instructional materials, and the opportunity for guided practice and additional teacher feedback. In addition, students also provided suggestions to improve the PFB process; most of these suggestions were related to the online aspect of the course and its negative influence on interaction possibilities, which impeded communication and the development of trust and relationships among students. These results demonstrate that a pedagogy-driven application of PFB in an online higher education course requires a needs-driven, context-dependent redesign of PFB assignment(s), especially in the observation- and emulation modelling phases with extra attention to interaction.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.