Sherin A. Said , Joanna IntHout , Hendrik Koffijberg , Joanne A. de Hullu , Simon E. Hyde , Maaike A. van der Aa , Anne M. van Altena
{"title":"基于澳大利亚和荷兰人群数据的晚期上皮性卵巢癌早期复发预测模型的外部验证","authors":"Sherin A. Said , Joanna IntHout , Hendrik Koffijberg , Joanne A. de Hullu , Simon E. Hyde , Maaike A. van der Aa , Anne M. van Altena","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2025.102824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To externally validate the published postoperative and <em>BRCA</em> models predictive of early relapse in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) using independent Australian and Dutch cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Advanced-stage EOC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2002, and June 1, 2006, in Australia, and between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, in the Netherlands were included. Data from patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were used to validate both models. Missing data were addressed through multiple imputation. Model updates included recalibration-in-the-large, recalibration, and model revision, with a closed testing procedure to identify the most suitable approach. Model performance was assessed for calibration, discrimination, and the Brier score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Australian cohort (N = 1334) included 457 early relapsers and 859 late or non-relapsers, showing baseline differences compared to the development cohort. Discrimination was adequate for both the postoperative and <em>BRCA</em> models (c-statistics: 0.69 and 0.70, respectively). The postoperative model required full revision, while recalibration-in-the-large was sufficient for the <em>BRCA</em> model in the Australian cohort. The Dutch cohort (N = 1212) included 283 early relapsers and 929 late or non-relapsers, with baseline characteristics similar to those of the development cohort. Both models demonstrated adequate discrimination (c-statistics: 0.71 and 0.70, respectively). Recalibration-in-the-large corrected miscalibration in the Dutch cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The postoperative and <em>BRCA</em> model were successfully validated for predicting early relapse in advanced-stage EOC patients, confirming their robustness. However, local data updates are advised to enhance accuracy across clinical settings. Online calculators were built for clinical use (<span><span>Link 1</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; <span><span>Link 2</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of prediction models for early relapse in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer using Australian and Dutch population-based data\",\"authors\":\"Sherin A. Said , Joanna IntHout , Hendrik Koffijberg , Joanne A. de Hullu , Simon E. Hyde , Maaike A. van der Aa , Anne M. van Altena\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.canep.2025.102824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To externally validate the published postoperative and <em>BRCA</em> models predictive of early relapse in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) using independent Australian and Dutch cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Advanced-stage EOC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2002, and June 1, 2006, in Australia, and between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, in the Netherlands were included. Data from patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were used to validate both models. Missing data were addressed through multiple imputation. Model updates included recalibration-in-the-large, recalibration, and model revision, with a closed testing procedure to identify the most suitable approach. Model performance was assessed for calibration, discrimination, and the Brier score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Australian cohort (N = 1334) included 457 early relapsers and 859 late or non-relapsers, showing baseline differences compared to the development cohort. Discrimination was adequate for both the postoperative and <em>BRCA</em> models (c-statistics: 0.69 and 0.70, respectively). The postoperative model required full revision, while recalibration-in-the-large was sufficient for the <em>BRCA</em> model in the Australian cohort. The Dutch cohort (N = 1212) included 283 early relapsers and 929 late or non-relapsers, with baseline characteristics similar to those of the development cohort. Both models demonstrated adequate discrimination (c-statistics: 0.71 and 0.70, respectively). Recalibration-in-the-large corrected miscalibration in the Dutch cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The postoperative and <em>BRCA</em> model were successfully validated for predicting early relapse in advanced-stage EOC patients, confirming their robustness. However, local data updates are advised to enhance accuracy across clinical settings. Online calculators were built for clinical use (<span><span>Link 1</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; <span><span>Link 2</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102824\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782125000840\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782125000840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
External validation of prediction models for early relapse in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer using Australian and Dutch population-based data
Objective
To externally validate the published postoperative and BRCA models predictive of early relapse in patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) using independent Australian and Dutch cohorts.
Methods
Advanced-stage EOC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2002, and June 1, 2006, in Australia, and between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, in the Netherlands were included. Data from patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were used to validate both models. Missing data were addressed through multiple imputation. Model updates included recalibration-in-the-large, recalibration, and model revision, with a closed testing procedure to identify the most suitable approach. Model performance was assessed for calibration, discrimination, and the Brier score.
Results
The Australian cohort (N = 1334) included 457 early relapsers and 859 late or non-relapsers, showing baseline differences compared to the development cohort. Discrimination was adequate for both the postoperative and BRCA models (c-statistics: 0.69 and 0.70, respectively). The postoperative model required full revision, while recalibration-in-the-large was sufficient for the BRCA model in the Australian cohort. The Dutch cohort (N = 1212) included 283 early relapsers and 929 late or non-relapsers, with baseline characteristics similar to those of the development cohort. Both models demonstrated adequate discrimination (c-statistics: 0.71 and 0.70, respectively). Recalibration-in-the-large corrected miscalibration in the Dutch cohort.
Conclusion
The postoperative and BRCA model were successfully validated for predicting early relapse in advanced-stage EOC patients, confirming their robustness. However, local data updates are advised to enhance accuracy across clinical settings. Online calculators were built for clinical use (Link 1; Link 2).
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including:
• Descriptive epidemiology
• Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis
• Screening and early detection
• Prevention and control
• Methodological issues
The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.