在增强现实中呈现的词和物体的不同语义处理的电生理证据

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Tom Bullock , Emily Machniak , Joyce Passananti , Kangyou Yu , Radha Kumaran , You-Jin Kim , Jordan Garrett , Madhav Viswesvaran , Julia Ram , Tobias Höllerer , Barry Giesbrecht
{"title":"在增强现实中呈现的词和物体的不同语义处理的电生理证据","authors":"Tom Bullock ,&nbsp;Emily Machniak ,&nbsp;Joyce Passananti ,&nbsp;Kangyou Yu ,&nbsp;Radha Kumaran ,&nbsp;You-Jin Kim ,&nbsp;Jordan Garrett ,&nbsp;Madhav Viswesvaran ,&nbsp;Julia Ram ,&nbsp;Tobias Höllerer ,&nbsp;Barry Giesbrecht","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Head-worn augmented reality (AR) offers exciting possibilities to help users learn new information. By blending digital content with the learner's real-world environment, AR can create engaging and enjoyable experiences that may improve knowledge retention. Electroencephalography (EEG) allows for discreet, continuous monitoring of brain activity at the scalp. This study examined whether the N400 event-related potential (ERP), a brain response linked to semantic processing, could be incorporated into a system combining AR and EEG. While the N400 is reliably elicited by a mismatch in meaning between two sequentially presented stimuli, there are two key outstanding questions. First, how do 3D objects presented in AR impact semantic processing as measured by the N400? Second, is there a reliable N400 to mismatches between an object and its name, in addition to mismatches in meaning? Twenty-four young adults viewed sequential pairs of stimuli through an AR headset while EEG was recorded. We manipulated whether the first stimulus was a 3D object or written word and whether the second stimulus matched or mismatched the first in terms of meaning or name. Participants' reaction times were slower for mismatching pairs when compared to matching pairs in all conditions. Averaged ERP and single-trial classification analyses showed robust differences in brain responses. Additionally, participants were more accurate and exhibited faster behavioral and brain responses for naming compared to meaning judgments. These results suggest the N400 could be used in a combined AR-EEG system to provide feedback on semantic understanding, potentially opening exciting new avenues for enhancing learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100677"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrophysiological evidence for differential semantic processing of words and objects presented in augmented reality\",\"authors\":\"Tom Bullock ,&nbsp;Emily Machniak ,&nbsp;Joyce Passananti ,&nbsp;Kangyou Yu ,&nbsp;Radha Kumaran ,&nbsp;You-Jin Kim ,&nbsp;Jordan Garrett ,&nbsp;Madhav Viswesvaran ,&nbsp;Julia Ram ,&nbsp;Tobias Höllerer ,&nbsp;Barry Giesbrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Head-worn augmented reality (AR) offers exciting possibilities to help users learn new information. By blending digital content with the learner's real-world environment, AR can create engaging and enjoyable experiences that may improve knowledge retention. Electroencephalography (EEG) allows for discreet, continuous monitoring of brain activity at the scalp. This study examined whether the N400 event-related potential (ERP), a brain response linked to semantic processing, could be incorporated into a system combining AR and EEG. While the N400 is reliably elicited by a mismatch in meaning between two sequentially presented stimuli, there are two key outstanding questions. First, how do 3D objects presented in AR impact semantic processing as measured by the N400? Second, is there a reliable N400 to mismatches between an object and its name, in addition to mismatches in meaning? Twenty-four young adults viewed sequential pairs of stimuli through an AR headset while EEG was recorded. We manipulated whether the first stimulus was a 3D object or written word and whether the second stimulus matched or mismatched the first in terms of meaning or name. Participants' reaction times were slower for mismatching pairs when compared to matching pairs in all conditions. Averaged ERP and single-trial classification analyses showed robust differences in brain responses. Additionally, participants were more accurate and exhibited faster behavioral and brain responses for naming compared to meaning judgments. These results suggest the N400 could be used in a combined AR-EEG system to provide feedback on semantic understanding, potentially opening exciting new avenues for enhancing learning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100677\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头戴式增强现实(AR)为帮助用户学习新信息提供了令人兴奋的可能性。通过将数字内容与学习者的现实环境相结合,增强现实可以创造引人入胜的愉快体验,从而提高知识留存率。脑电图(EEG)允许对头皮的大脑活动进行谨慎、连续的监测。这项研究考察了N400事件相关电位(ERP),一种与语义处理相关的大脑反应,是否可以纳入AR和EEG相结合的系统。虽然N400确实是由两个顺序呈现的刺激之间的意义不匹配引起的,但有两个关键的突出问题。首先,AR中呈现的3D对象如何影响N400测量的语义处理?其次,除了含义不匹配之外,对象与其名称之间是否存在可靠的N400 ?24名年轻人通过AR耳机观看连续对刺激,同时记录脑电图。我们操纵了第一个刺激是3D物体还是文字,以及第二个刺激在意义或名称上是否与第一个刺激匹配。在所有条件下,与匹配的配对相比,参与者对不匹配的配对的反应时间要慢。平均ERP和单试验分类分析显示了大脑反应的显著差异。此外,与意义判断相比,参与者对命名的判断更准确,表现出更快的行为和大脑反应。这些结果表明,N400可以用于AR-EEG组合系统,提供语义理解的反馈,可能为增强学习开辟令人兴奋的新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrophysiological evidence for differential semantic processing of words and objects presented in augmented reality
Head-worn augmented reality (AR) offers exciting possibilities to help users learn new information. By blending digital content with the learner's real-world environment, AR can create engaging and enjoyable experiences that may improve knowledge retention. Electroencephalography (EEG) allows for discreet, continuous monitoring of brain activity at the scalp. This study examined whether the N400 event-related potential (ERP), a brain response linked to semantic processing, could be incorporated into a system combining AR and EEG. While the N400 is reliably elicited by a mismatch in meaning between two sequentially presented stimuli, there are two key outstanding questions. First, how do 3D objects presented in AR impact semantic processing as measured by the N400? Second, is there a reliable N400 to mismatches between an object and its name, in addition to mismatches in meaning? Twenty-four young adults viewed sequential pairs of stimuli through an AR headset while EEG was recorded. We manipulated whether the first stimulus was a 3D object or written word and whether the second stimulus matched or mismatched the first in terms of meaning or name. Participants' reaction times were slower for mismatching pairs when compared to matching pairs in all conditions. Averaged ERP and single-trial classification analyses showed robust differences in brain responses. Additionally, participants were more accurate and exhibited faster behavioral and brain responses for naming compared to meaning judgments. These results suggest the N400 could be used in a combined AR-EEG system to provide feedback on semantic understanding, potentially opening exciting new avenues for enhancing learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信