Junchen Guo , Linghao Zeng , Yunyun Dai , Xianghua Xu , Yonghong Hu , Yongyi Chen
{"title":"中国成人姑息治疗共享医疗管理标准:德尔菲研究","authors":"Junchen Guo , Linghao Zeng , Yunyun Dai , Xianghua Xu , Yonghong Hu , Yongyi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Shared-care management (SCM) in palliative care is a collaborative model where shared care teams work in partnership with patients' original health care providers, employing multimodal strategies including consultations and coordinated referrals to enhance quality of care for patients. The evidence regarding its implementation remains fragmented and lacks detailed explanations, which impedes its application in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a SCM standard of palliative care in adults in mainland regions of China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Initial standard framework identification was achieved via literature evidence summary. From April to August 2024, two rounds of Delphi method was conducted with the purposes of modifying the standard. To establish consensus, items with a mean importance score > 3.50 and the coefficient of variation of item scores < 0.25 were retained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The first round involved 35 experts, with a follow-up participation of 33 in the second round. The Kendall concordance coefficients of the two rounds of experts consultation were 0.128 and 0.134, respectively (all <em>P</em> < 0.001), indicating consensus among the experts. At the end of the second round, the average importance score of each item was 4.73–5.00. A total of 8 modules including SCM team, applicable population, process of SCM, contents of SCM, start time, precautions, effectiveness evaluation and quality control, and the corresponding 22 items were finally identified in this standard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The establishment of the standard in this study provides a critical framework that can be adopted by health care institutions to ensure that SCM services are delivered uniformly and effectively in mainland regions of China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100702"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared-care management standards of palliative care in Chinese adults: A Delphi study\",\"authors\":\"Junchen Guo , Linghao Zeng , Yunyun Dai , Xianghua Xu , Yonghong Hu , Yongyi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Shared-care management (SCM) in palliative care is a collaborative model where shared care teams work in partnership with patients' original health care providers, employing multimodal strategies including consultations and coordinated referrals to enhance quality of care for patients. The evidence regarding its implementation remains fragmented and lacks detailed explanations, which impedes its application in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a SCM standard of palliative care in adults in mainland regions of China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Initial standard framework identification was achieved via literature evidence summary. From April to August 2024, two rounds of Delphi method was conducted with the purposes of modifying the standard. To establish consensus, items with a mean importance score > 3.50 and the coefficient of variation of item scores < 0.25 were retained.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The first round involved 35 experts, with a follow-up participation of 33 in the second round. The Kendall concordance coefficients of the two rounds of experts consultation were 0.128 and 0.134, respectively (all <em>P</em> < 0.001), indicating consensus among the experts. At the end of the second round, the average importance score of each item was 4.73–5.00. A total of 8 modules including SCM team, applicable population, process of SCM, contents of SCM, start time, precautions, effectiveness evaluation and quality control, and the corresponding 22 items were finally identified in this standard.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The establishment of the standard in this study provides a critical framework that can be adopted by health care institutions to ensure that SCM services are delivered uniformly and effectively in mainland regions of China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562525000502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562525000502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shared-care management standards of palliative care in Chinese adults: A Delphi study
Objective
Shared-care management (SCM) in palliative care is a collaborative model where shared care teams work in partnership with patients' original health care providers, employing multimodal strategies including consultations and coordinated referrals to enhance quality of care for patients. The evidence regarding its implementation remains fragmented and lacks detailed explanations, which impedes its application in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop a SCM standard of palliative care in adults in mainland regions of China.
Methods
Initial standard framework identification was achieved via literature evidence summary. From April to August 2024, two rounds of Delphi method was conducted with the purposes of modifying the standard. To establish consensus, items with a mean importance score > 3.50 and the coefficient of variation of item scores < 0.25 were retained.
Results
The first round involved 35 experts, with a follow-up participation of 33 in the second round. The Kendall concordance coefficients of the two rounds of experts consultation were 0.128 and 0.134, respectively (all P < 0.001), indicating consensus among the experts. At the end of the second round, the average importance score of each item was 4.73–5.00. A total of 8 modules including SCM team, applicable population, process of SCM, contents of SCM, start time, precautions, effectiveness evaluation and quality control, and the corresponding 22 items were finally identified in this standard.
Conclusions
The establishment of the standard in this study provides a critical framework that can be adopted by health care institutions to ensure that SCM services are delivered uniformly and effectively in mainland regions of China.