优化PRO研究的整体结果:标准化TAVR技术和护理途径

Kendra J. Grubb MD, MHA , Hemal Gada MD , Douglas Fraser MB, BChir, MA, DM , Josep Rodes-Cabau MD, PhD , Tamim M. Nazif MD , Suneet Mittal MD , Danny Dvir MD , Emmanuel Teiger MD , Lang Lin MD , Joshua D. Rovin MD , Ramzi F. Khalil MD , Ibrahim Sultan MD , Matias B. Yudi MD , Blake Gardner MD , David Lorenz MD , Stanley Chetcuti MD , Nainesh C. Patel MD , James Harvey MD , Paul Mahoney MD , Deepak Talreja MD , Steven J. Yakubov MD
{"title":"优化PRO研究的整体结果:标准化TAVR技术和护理途径","authors":"Kendra J. Grubb MD, MHA ,&nbsp;Hemal Gada MD ,&nbsp;Douglas Fraser MB, BChir, MA, DM ,&nbsp;Josep Rodes-Cabau MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tamim M. Nazif MD ,&nbsp;Suneet Mittal MD ,&nbsp;Danny Dvir MD ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Teiger MD ,&nbsp;Lang Lin MD ,&nbsp;Joshua D. Rovin MD ,&nbsp;Ramzi F. Khalil MD ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Sultan MD ,&nbsp;Matias B. Yudi MD ,&nbsp;Blake Gardner MD ,&nbsp;David Lorenz MD ,&nbsp;Stanley Chetcuti MD ,&nbsp;Nainesh C. Patel MD ,&nbsp;James Harvey MD ,&nbsp;Paul Mahoney MD ,&nbsp;Deepak Talreja MD ,&nbsp;Steven J. Yakubov MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The safety and efficacy of utilizing standardized implant protocols and care pathways are limited in large global prospective studies of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and institutional variability remains. This analysis aims to report 30-day outcomes from the global Optimize PRO study evaluating valve performance and procedural outcomes using an “optimized” TAVR care pathway and the cusp overlap technique (COT) in patients receiving Evolut PRO/PRO+ valves.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Optimize PRO study is a multicenter, postmarket, prospective study conducted in 50 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, and Australia. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and no preexisting pacemakers underwent TAVR with standardized optimized preprocedure, periprocedure, and postprocedure pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 653 patients with attempted TAVR implants, a mean age of 79.1 ± 6.5 years, and a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk of mortality of 3.2% ± 2.5%. The primary 30-day end point of all-cause mortality or all stroke was 5.1%, all-cause mortality 0.8%, and disabling stroke 1.7%. The new 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 6.4% with 4-step COT compliance and 11.1% overall. At discharge, there were no instances of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, and 76.2% of patients had none/trace aortic regurgitation. The median length of stay was 2 days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Optimize PRO study demonstrated low rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation and no moderate to severe aortic regurgitation after TAVR with Evolut PRO/PRO+ using COT and perioperative protocols in a global cohort of severe aortic stenosis patients. Best practices resulted in consistent implantation depth and low complication rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73990,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","volume":"4 5","pages":"Article 103515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Results From the Optimize PRO Study: Standardized TAVR Technique and Care Pathway\",\"authors\":\"Kendra J. Grubb MD, MHA ,&nbsp;Hemal Gada MD ,&nbsp;Douglas Fraser MB, BChir, MA, DM ,&nbsp;Josep Rodes-Cabau MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tamim M. Nazif MD ,&nbsp;Suneet Mittal MD ,&nbsp;Danny Dvir MD ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Teiger MD ,&nbsp;Lang Lin MD ,&nbsp;Joshua D. Rovin MD ,&nbsp;Ramzi F. Khalil MD ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Sultan MD ,&nbsp;Matias B. Yudi MD ,&nbsp;Blake Gardner MD ,&nbsp;David Lorenz MD ,&nbsp;Stanley Chetcuti MD ,&nbsp;Nainesh C. Patel MD ,&nbsp;James Harvey MD ,&nbsp;Paul Mahoney MD ,&nbsp;Deepak Talreja MD ,&nbsp;Steven J. Yakubov MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The safety and efficacy of utilizing standardized implant protocols and care pathways are limited in large global prospective studies of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and institutional variability remains. This analysis aims to report 30-day outcomes from the global Optimize PRO study evaluating valve performance and procedural outcomes using an “optimized” TAVR care pathway and the cusp overlap technique (COT) in patients receiving Evolut PRO/PRO+ valves.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Optimize PRO study is a multicenter, postmarket, prospective study conducted in 50 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, and Australia. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and no preexisting pacemakers underwent TAVR with standardized optimized preprocedure, periprocedure, and postprocedure pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 653 patients with attempted TAVR implants, a mean age of 79.1 ± 6.5 years, and a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk of mortality of 3.2% ± 2.5%. The primary 30-day end point of all-cause mortality or all stroke was 5.1%, all-cause mortality 0.8%, and disabling stroke 1.7%. The new 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 6.4% with 4-step COT compliance and 11.1% overall. At discharge, there were no instances of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, and 76.2% of patients had none/trace aortic regurgitation. The median length of stay was 2 days.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Optimize PRO study demonstrated low rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation and no moderate to severe aortic regurgitation after TAVR with Evolut PRO/PRO+ using COT and perioperative protocols in a global cohort of severe aortic stenosis patients. Best practices resulted in consistent implantation depth and low complication rates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325009573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772930325009573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的大型全球前瞻性研究中,使用标准化植入方案和护理途径的安全性和有效性是有限的,并且机构差异仍然存在。本分析旨在报告全球优化PRO研究的30天结果,该研究使用“优化的”TAVR护理途径和尖端重叠技术(COT)评估接受Evolut PRO/PRO+瓣膜的患者的瓣膜性能和手术结果。优化PRO研究是一项多中心、上市后、前瞻性研究,在美国、加拿大、欧洲、中东和澳大利亚的50个中心进行。有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄且先前无起搏器的患者采用标准化优化的术前、围术期和术后路径进行TAVR。结果653例TAVR植入患者,平均年龄79.1±6.5岁,胸外科学会预测的平均死亡风险为3.2%±2.5%。全因死亡率或全卒中的主要30天终点为5.1%,全因死亡率为0.8%,致残性卒中为1.7%。新的30天永久性起搏器植入率为6.4%,4步COT依从性为11.1%。出院时,无中度或重度主动脉反流病例,76.2%的患者无/微量主动脉反流。中位住院时间为2天。优化PRO研究表明,在全球严重主动脉狭窄患者队列中,采用COT和围手术期方案的Evolut PRO/PRO+ TAVR后,新的永久性起搏器植入率低,无中度至重度主动脉反流。最佳实践结果是植入深度一致,并发症发生率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Results From the Optimize PRO Study: Standardized TAVR Technique and Care Pathway

Background

The safety and efficacy of utilizing standardized implant protocols and care pathways are limited in large global prospective studies of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and institutional variability remains. This analysis aims to report 30-day outcomes from the global Optimize PRO study evaluating valve performance and procedural outcomes using an “optimized” TAVR care pathway and the cusp overlap technique (COT) in patients receiving Evolut PRO/PRO+ valves.

Methods

The Optimize PRO study is a multicenter, postmarket, prospective study conducted in 50 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, and Australia. Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and no preexisting pacemakers underwent TAVR with standardized optimized preprocedure, periprocedure, and postprocedure pathways.

Results

There were 653 patients with attempted TAVR implants, a mean age of 79.1 ± 6.5 years, and a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk of mortality of 3.2% ± 2.5%. The primary 30-day end point of all-cause mortality or all stroke was 5.1%, all-cause mortality 0.8%, and disabling stroke 1.7%. The new 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 6.4% with 4-step COT compliance and 11.1% overall. At discharge, there were no instances of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, and 76.2% of patients had none/trace aortic regurgitation. The median length of stay was 2 days.

Conclusions

The Optimize PRO study demonstrated low rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation and no moderate to severe aortic regurgitation after TAVR with Evolut PRO/PRO+ using COT and perioperative protocols in a global cohort of severe aortic stenosis patients. Best practices resulted in consistent implantation depth and low complication rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信