低压区消融治疗持续性心房颤动:一项随机对照试验

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Masaharu Masuda, Akihiro Sunaga, Nobuaki Tanaka, Tetsuya Watanabe, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Yasuyuki Egami, Takafumi Oka, Tomoko Minamisaka, Takashi Kanda, Masato Okada, Masato Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Koji Tanaka, Tomomi Yamada, Shungo Hikoso, Tomoharu Dohi, Koichi Inoue, Yohei Sotomi, Yasushi Sakata
{"title":"低压区消融治疗持续性心房颤动:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Masaharu Masuda, Akihiro Sunaga, Nobuaki Tanaka, Tetsuya Watanabe, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Yasuyuki Egami, Takafumi Oka, Tomoko Minamisaka, Takashi Kanda, Masato Okada, Masato Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Koji Tanaka, Tomomi Yamada, Shungo Hikoso, Tomoharu Dohi, Koichi Inoue, Yohei Sotomi, Yasushi Sakata","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03674-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm<sup>2</sup> of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (<i>n</i> = 170) or the PVI-alone group (<i>n</i> = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53–68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42–57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"223 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Masaharu Masuda, Akihiro Sunaga, Nobuaki Tanaka, Tetsuya Watanabe, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Yasuyuki Egami, Takafumi Oka, Tomoko Minamisaka, Takashi Kanda, Masato Okada, Masato Kawasaki, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Koji Tanaka, Tomomi Yamada, Shungo Hikoso, Tomoharu Dohi, Koichi Inoue, Yohei Sotomi, Yasushi Sakata\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03674-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm<sup>2</sup> of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (<i>n</i> = 170) or the PVI-alone group (<i>n</i> = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53–68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42–57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>P</i> for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"223 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":58.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03674-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03674-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

左心房低压区(LVA)可能促进心房颤动(AF),但LVA消融预防心律失常的效果尚未确定。在本研究中,我们进行了一项多中心随机对照试验(SUPPRESS-AF),以研究左房LVA消融对持续性房颤患者左房LVA的疗效。持续性房颤和左房LVA患者在肺静脉隔离(PVI)后的电压图上覆盖≥5 cm2的左房表面,按1:1的比例随机分为LVA消融组(PVI + LVA- abl组)和非LVA消融组(单独PVI组)。采用24小时动态心电图(Holter electrocardiography, ECG)和每日两次便携式心电图(portable ECG)监测房颤或房性心动过速(AT)的复发情况。主要终点是1年随访期间无房颤或AT复发且无抗心律失常药物使用。在1347例因房颤接受初始消融的患者中(1003名男性和344名女性),左房lva患者被分配到PVI + LVA-ABL组(n = 170)或单独PVI组(n = 171)。虽然PVI + LVA-ABL组与单独PVI组相比,在数值上显示AF或AT的自由复发率更高(61%(95%置信区间(CI) = 53-68%)对50% (95% CI = 42-57%),但这种差异没有达到统计学意义(log(rank)检验的P = 0.127)。两组手术相关的严重不良事件发生率无差异(1.7%对1.8%,P < 0.0001)。总之,LVA消融除了元太没有显著减少1年期房颤复发或持续性房颤患者左心房LVAs。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些患者可以从LVA消融中获得更大的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Low-voltage-area ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Low-voltage areas (LVAs) in the left atrium may promote atrial fibrillation (AF), but the efficacy of LVA ablation for preventing arrhythmia has not been determined. In the present study, we carried out a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SUPPRESS-AF) to investigate the efficacy of LVA ablation in patients with persistent AF who had left atrial LVAs. Patients with persistent AF and left atrial LVAs that covered ≥5 cm2 of the left atrial surface on a voltage map after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were randomized to undergo LVA ablation (PVI + LVA-ABL group) or not (PVI-alone group) in a 1:1 fashion. Recurrence of AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) was monitored using 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and twice-daily portable ECG recordings. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF or AT recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug use during 1 year of follow-up. Of 1,347 patients (1,003 males and 344 females) who underwent initial ablation for AF, patients with left atrial LVAs were assigned to the PVI + LVA-ABL (n = 170) or the PVI-alone group (n = 171). Although the PVI + LVA-ABL group demonstrated a numerically higher rate of freedom from AF or AT recurrence compared with the PVI-alone group (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 53–68%) versus 50% (95% CI = 42–57%)), this difference did not reach statistical significance (P for log(rank) test = 0.127). There was no difference in the procedure-related serious adverse events between the two groups (1.7% versus 1.8%, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, LVA ablation in addition to PVI did not significantly reduce 1-year AF or AT recurrence in patients with persistent AF with left atrial LVAs. Future studies are needed to identify patients who may receive greater benefit from LVA ablation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信