{"title":"基于优化保形预测的瞬态引力波噪声伪影的分类不确定性","authors":"Ann-Kristin Malz, Gregory Ashton, Nicolo Colombo","doi":"10.1103/physrevd.111.084078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in scientific research comes the need for reliable uncertainty quantification. When taking a measurement it is not enough to provide the result, we also have to declare how confident we are in the measurement. This is also true when the results are obtained from a ML algorithm, and arguably more so since the internal workings of ML algorithms are often less transparent compared to traditional statistical methods. Additionally, many ML algorithms do not provide uncertainty estimates, and auxiliary algorithms must be applied. Conformal prediction (C</a:mi>P</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math>) is a framework to provide such uncertainty quantifications for ML point predictors. In this paper, we explore the use and properties of <c:math xmlns:c=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><c:mrow><c:mi>C</c:mi><c:mi>P</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> applied in the context of glitch classification in gravitational wave astronomy. Specifically, we demonstrate the application of <e:math xmlns:e=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><e:mrow><e:mi>C</e:mi><e:mi>P</e:mi></e:mrow></e:math> to the Gravity Spy glitch classification algorithm. <g:math xmlns:g=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\"><g:mrow><g:mi>C</g:mi><g:mi>P</g:mi></g:mrow></g:math> makes use of a score function, a nonconformity measure, to convert an algorithm’s heuristic notion of uncertainty to a rigorous uncertainty. We use the application on Gravity Spy to explore the performance of different nonconformity measures and optimize them for our application. Our results show that the optimal nonconformity measure depends on the specific application, as well as the metric used to quantify the performance. <jats:supplementary-material> <jats:copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</jats:copyright-statement> <jats:copyright-year>2025</jats:copyright-year> </jats:permissions> </jats:supplementary-material>","PeriodicalId":20167,"journal":{"name":"Physical Review D","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification uncertainty for transient gravitational-wave noise artifacts with optimized conformal prediction\",\"authors\":\"Ann-Kristin Malz, Gregory Ashton, Nicolo Colombo\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/physrevd.111.084078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increasing use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in scientific research comes the need for reliable uncertainty quantification. When taking a measurement it is not enough to provide the result, we also have to declare how confident we are in the measurement. This is also true when the results are obtained from a ML algorithm, and arguably more so since the internal workings of ML algorithms are often less transparent compared to traditional statistical methods. Additionally, many ML algorithms do not provide uncertainty estimates, and auxiliary algorithms must be applied. Conformal prediction (C</a:mi>P</a:mi></a:mrow></a:math>) is a framework to provide such uncertainty quantifications for ML point predictors. In this paper, we explore the use and properties of <c:math xmlns:c=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><c:mrow><c:mi>C</c:mi><c:mi>P</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> applied in the context of glitch classification in gravitational wave astronomy. Specifically, we demonstrate the application of <e:math xmlns:e=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><e:mrow><e:mi>C</e:mi><e:mi>P</e:mi></e:mrow></e:math> to the Gravity Spy glitch classification algorithm. <g:math xmlns:g=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" display=\\\"inline\\\"><g:mrow><g:mi>C</g:mi><g:mi>P</g:mi></g:mrow></g:math> makes use of a score function, a nonconformity measure, to convert an algorithm’s heuristic notion of uncertainty to a rigorous uncertainty. We use the application on Gravity Spy to explore the performance of different nonconformity measures and optimize them for our application. Our results show that the optimal nonconformity measure depends on the specific application, as well as the metric used to quantify the performance. <jats:supplementary-material> <jats:copyright-statement>Published by the American Physical Society</jats:copyright-statement> <jats:copyright-year>2025</jats:copyright-year> </jats:permissions> </jats:supplementary-material>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Review D\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Review D\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.084078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Review D","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.084078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classification uncertainty for transient gravitational-wave noise artifacts with optimized conformal prediction
With the increasing use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in scientific research comes the need for reliable uncertainty quantification. When taking a measurement it is not enough to provide the result, we also have to declare how confident we are in the measurement. This is also true when the results are obtained from a ML algorithm, and arguably more so since the internal workings of ML algorithms are often less transparent compared to traditional statistical methods. Additionally, many ML algorithms do not provide uncertainty estimates, and auxiliary algorithms must be applied. Conformal prediction (CP) is a framework to provide such uncertainty quantifications for ML point predictors. In this paper, we explore the use and properties of CP applied in the context of glitch classification in gravitational wave astronomy. Specifically, we demonstrate the application of CP to the Gravity Spy glitch classification algorithm. CP makes use of a score function, a nonconformity measure, to convert an algorithm’s heuristic notion of uncertainty to a rigorous uncertainty. We use the application on Gravity Spy to explore the performance of different nonconformity measures and optimize them for our application. Our results show that the optimal nonconformity measure depends on the specific application, as well as the metric used to quantify the performance. Published by the American Physical Society2025
期刊介绍:
Physical Review D (PRD) is a leading journal in elementary particle physics, field theory, gravitation, and cosmology and is one of the top-cited journals in high-energy physics.
PRD covers experimental and theoretical results in all aspects of particle physics, field theory, gravitation and cosmology, including:
Particle physics experiments,
Electroweak interactions,
Strong interactions,
Lattice field theories, lattice QCD,
Beyond the standard model physics,
Phenomenological aspects of field theory, general methods,
Gravity, cosmology, cosmic rays,
Astrophysics and astroparticle physics,
General relativity,
Formal aspects of field theory, field theory in curved space,
String theory, quantum gravity, gauge/gravity duality.