政府投资的异质性和国际化:主权财富基金及其他

IF 8.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ginka Borisova
{"title":"政府投资的异质性和国际化:主权财富基金及其他","authors":"Ginka Borisova","doi":"10.1057/s41267-025-00785-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite its continued significance and dynamic forms, government ownership is often presented in broad, monolithic terms. Comparing 67,464 government and private acquirer transactions over four decades, we highlight important distinctions in target selection and valuation effects of 129 unique government investment funds (GIFs), including sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), lesser-known subsidiaries called sovereign wealth enterprises (SWEs), and government-owned pension funds. GIFs, particularly SWFs, are significantly more likely to make foreign investments than non-government investors, which is consistent with their pursuit of internationalization. However, GIFs purchase smaller stakes in targets compared to private acquirers, reflecting concerns about their legitimacy and control over businesses, especially in foreign SWE transactions. Considering how investors evaluate government and private investments, we find that GIF transactions result in significantly lower target returns, with SWE acquisitions being the exception. Evidence suggests these results are driven by liabilities of stateness, such as multi-layered agency concerns and acquirer opaqueness, which vary across GIFs. We also find that macroeconomic conditions that restrict private investment create an internationalization channel for state investors. By recognizing a richer set of motivations and outcomes for various GIFs, public and private stakeholders can optimize state investment transactions, particularly as governments expand their use of different investing vehicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":48453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Business Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity and internationalization of government investments: sovereign wealth funds and beyond\",\"authors\":\"Ginka Borisova\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41267-025-00785-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite its continued significance and dynamic forms, government ownership is often presented in broad, monolithic terms. Comparing 67,464 government and private acquirer transactions over four decades, we highlight important distinctions in target selection and valuation effects of 129 unique government investment funds (GIFs), including sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), lesser-known subsidiaries called sovereign wealth enterprises (SWEs), and government-owned pension funds. GIFs, particularly SWFs, are significantly more likely to make foreign investments than non-government investors, which is consistent with their pursuit of internationalization. However, GIFs purchase smaller stakes in targets compared to private acquirers, reflecting concerns about their legitimacy and control over businesses, especially in foreign SWE transactions. Considering how investors evaluate government and private investments, we find that GIF transactions result in significantly lower target returns, with SWE acquisitions being the exception. Evidence suggests these results are driven by liabilities of stateness, such as multi-layered agency concerns and acquirer opaqueness, which vary across GIFs. We also find that macroeconomic conditions that restrict private investment create an internationalization channel for state investors. By recognizing a richer set of motivations and outcomes for various GIFs, public and private stakeholders can optimize state investment transactions, particularly as governments expand their use of different investing vehicles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Business Studies\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-025-00785-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-025-00785-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管政府所有权具有持续的重要性和动态形式,但它经常以广泛而单一的方式呈现。我们比较了40年来67,464笔政府和私人收购方的交易,强调了129种独特的政府投资基金(gif)在目标选择和估值效果上的重要区别,这些基金包括主权财富基金(SWFs)、不太知名的主权财富企业(SWEs)子公司和政府所有的养老基金。动图基金,特别是主权财富基金,比非政府投资者更有可能进行海外投资,这与他们追求国际化是一致的。然而,与私人收购者相比,动图收购的目标股权较小,反映出人们对其合法性和对企业的控制感到担忧,尤其是在海外SWE交易中。考虑到投资者如何评估政府和私人投资,我们发现GIF交易的目标回报率明显较低,但SWE收购是例外。有证据表明,这些结果是由状态的责任驱动的,比如多层次的机构关注和收购方的不透明,这些都因gif而异。我们还发现,限制私人投资的宏观经济条件为国家投资者创造了一个国际化渠道。通过认识到各种动图的更丰富的动机和结果,公共和私人利益相关者可以优化国家投资交易,特别是在政府扩大使用不同投资工具的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heterogeneity and internationalization of government investments: sovereign wealth funds and beyond

Despite its continued significance and dynamic forms, government ownership is often presented in broad, monolithic terms. Comparing 67,464 government and private acquirer transactions over four decades, we highlight important distinctions in target selection and valuation effects of 129 unique government investment funds (GIFs), including sovereign wealth funds (SWFs), lesser-known subsidiaries called sovereign wealth enterprises (SWEs), and government-owned pension funds. GIFs, particularly SWFs, are significantly more likely to make foreign investments than non-government investors, which is consistent with their pursuit of internationalization. However, GIFs purchase smaller stakes in targets compared to private acquirers, reflecting concerns about their legitimacy and control over businesses, especially in foreign SWE transactions. Considering how investors evaluate government and private investments, we find that GIF transactions result in significantly lower target returns, with SWE acquisitions being the exception. Evidence suggests these results are driven by liabilities of stateness, such as multi-layered agency concerns and acquirer opaqueness, which vary across GIFs. We also find that macroeconomic conditions that restrict private investment create an internationalization channel for state investors. By recognizing a richer set of motivations and outcomes for various GIFs, public and private stakeholders can optimize state investment transactions, particularly as governments expand their use of different investing vehicles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Selection Committee for the JIBS Decade Award is pleased to announce that the 2023 award will be presented to Anthony Goerzen, Christian Geisler Asmussen, and Bo Bernhard Nielsen for their article titled "Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy," published in JIBS in 2013 (volume 44, issue 5, pages 427-450). The prestigious JIBS Decade Award, sponsored by Palgrave Macmillan, recognizes the most influential paper published in the Journal of International Business Studies from a decade earlier. The award will be presented at the annual AIB conference. To be eligible for the JIBS Decade Award, an article must be one of the top five most cited papers published in JIBS for the respective year. The Selection Committee for this year included Kaz Asakawa, Jeremy Clegg, Catherine Welch, and Rosalie L. Tung, serving as the Committee Chair and JIBS Editor-in-Chief, all from distinguished universities around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信