MODIS气溶胶和低云反演:麦夸里岛尾流的地形效应

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Emily Tansey, Roger Marchand, Duli Chand
{"title":"MODIS气溶胶和低云反演:麦夸里岛尾流的地形效应","authors":"Emily Tansey,&nbsp;Roger Marchand,&nbsp;Duli Chand","doi":"10.1029/2024EA004129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Visible/infrared imagery from passive satellites is commonly relied upon to study low cloud microphysics over oceanic regions, including for the Southern Ocean (SO), but relatively little validation has been undertaken for the SO. In this article, we compare low-cloud effective radius (<i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>), cloud droplet number concentration (<i>N</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>) and cloud liquid water path (LWP) retrievals from the NASA Moderate Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with surface measurements collected during the Macquarie Island Cloud and Radiation Experiment (MICRE). MODIS 3.7-μm band retrievals show little bias and moderately good correlation relative to MICRE retrievals for liquid-phase low clouds when restricted to Solar Zenith Angles &lt;65° on spatial scales of 50–100 km. However, the low overall bias in 3.7-μm band effective radius (<i>r</i><sub><i>e</i> 3.7</sub>) retrievals partly results from cancellation of errors: <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i> 3.7</sub> is overestimated for non-to-lightly precipitating clouds, and underestimated for heavier drizzling clouds by ∼1–1.5 μm. 1.6-μm and 2.1-μm band <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub> retrievals are biased high. <i>N</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> may likewise be slightly under- or overestimated depending on the concentration, but there is insufficient data to provide confidence in this result. Interestingly, a composite of MODIS retrievals from 2002 to 2020 show a distinct region of enhanced cloud cover and <i>N</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> (and lower <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>) in the wake of Macquarie Island associated with orographic cloud formation. MODIS retrievals of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Angstrom Exponent (AE) upwind and downwind of the island do not differ significantly. Comparison with MICRE measurements suggests that MODIS Collection 6 AOD retrievals are reasonable, while AE is problematically large.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA004129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MODIS Aerosol and Low-Cloud Retrievals: Orographic Effects in the Wake of Macquarie Island\",\"authors\":\"Emily Tansey,&nbsp;Roger Marchand,&nbsp;Duli Chand\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024EA004129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Visible/infrared imagery from passive satellites is commonly relied upon to study low cloud microphysics over oceanic regions, including for the Southern Ocean (SO), but relatively little validation has been undertaken for the SO. In this article, we compare low-cloud effective radius (<i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>), cloud droplet number concentration (<i>N</i><sub><i>d</i></sub>) and cloud liquid water path (LWP) retrievals from the NASA Moderate Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with surface measurements collected during the Macquarie Island Cloud and Radiation Experiment (MICRE). MODIS 3.7-μm band retrievals show little bias and moderately good correlation relative to MICRE retrievals for liquid-phase low clouds when restricted to Solar Zenith Angles &lt;65° on spatial scales of 50–100 km. However, the low overall bias in 3.7-μm band effective radius (<i>r</i><sub><i>e</i> 3.7</sub>) retrievals partly results from cancellation of errors: <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i> 3.7</sub> is overestimated for non-to-lightly precipitating clouds, and underestimated for heavier drizzling clouds by ∼1–1.5 μm. 1.6-μm and 2.1-μm band <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub> retrievals are biased high. <i>N</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> may likewise be slightly under- or overestimated depending on the concentration, but there is insufficient data to provide confidence in this result. Interestingly, a composite of MODIS retrievals from 2002 to 2020 show a distinct region of enhanced cloud cover and <i>N</i><sub><i>d</i></sub> (and lower <i>r</i><sub><i>e</i></sub>) in the wake of Macquarie Island associated with orographic cloud formation. MODIS retrievals of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Angstrom Exponent (AE) upwind and downwind of the island do not differ significantly. Comparison with MICRE measurements suggests that MODIS Collection 6 AOD retrievals are reasonable, while AE is problematically large.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA004129\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA004129\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA004129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自被动卫星的可见光/红外图像通常用于研究海洋区域的低云微物理,包括南大洋(SO),但对南大洋进行的验证相对较少。在本文中,我们比较了NASA中等成像光谱仪(MODIS)获取的低云有效半径(re)、云滴数浓度(Nd)和云液液水路径(LWP)与麦格理岛云和辐射实验(MICRE)收集的地面测量数据。在50-100 km空间尺度上,当太阳天顶角为65°时,MODIS 3.7 μm波段反演结果与MICRE反演结果偏差较小,相关性较好。然而,3.7 μm波段有效半径(re 3.7)的低总体偏差部分是由于误差的消除:对于非轻降水云,re 3.7被高估了,而对于较重的毛毛雨云,re 3.7被低估了~ 1-1.5 μm。1.6 μm和2.1 μm波段回波偏大。同样,根据浓度的不同,Nd也可能被略微低估或高估,但没有足够的数据来对这一结果提供信心。有趣的是,2002年至2020年MODIS检索的复合数据显示,在麦考瑞岛之后,云量和Nd(以及re)明显增加,这与地形云的形成有关。MODIS反演的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)和埃指数(AE)在岛上风向和风向没有显著差异。与MICRE测量值的比较表明,MODIS Collection 6的AOD检索是合理的,而AE则存在较大的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

MODIS Aerosol and Low-Cloud Retrievals: Orographic Effects in the Wake of Macquarie Island

MODIS Aerosol and Low-Cloud Retrievals: Orographic Effects in the Wake of Macquarie Island

Visible/infrared imagery from passive satellites is commonly relied upon to study low cloud microphysics over oceanic regions, including for the Southern Ocean (SO), but relatively little validation has been undertaken for the SO. In this article, we compare low-cloud effective radius (re), cloud droplet number concentration (Nd) and cloud liquid water path (LWP) retrievals from the NASA Moderate Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) with surface measurements collected during the Macquarie Island Cloud and Radiation Experiment (MICRE). MODIS 3.7-μm band retrievals show little bias and moderately good correlation relative to MICRE retrievals for liquid-phase low clouds when restricted to Solar Zenith Angles <65° on spatial scales of 50–100 km. However, the low overall bias in 3.7-μm band effective radius (re 3.7) retrievals partly results from cancellation of errors: re 3.7 is overestimated for non-to-lightly precipitating clouds, and underestimated for heavier drizzling clouds by ∼1–1.5 μm. 1.6-μm and 2.1-μm band re retrievals are biased high. Nd may likewise be slightly under- or overestimated depending on the concentration, but there is insufficient data to provide confidence in this result. Interestingly, a composite of MODIS retrievals from 2002 to 2020 show a distinct region of enhanced cloud cover and Nd (and lower re) in the wake of Macquarie Island associated with orographic cloud formation. MODIS retrievals of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and Angstrom Exponent (AE) upwind and downwind of the island do not differ significantly. Comparison with MICRE measurements suggests that MODIS Collection 6 AOD retrievals are reasonable, while AE is problematically large.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信