用高效液相色谱法控制各种正虹吸雄蕊叶提取物的质量:基于多变量和基于标记的分析技术

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mustofa Ahda, Irwandi Jaswir, Alfi Khatib, Qamar Uddin Ahmed, Nurkhasanah Mahfudh, Indro Prastowo, Mohd Salleh Rofiee, Mohammad Kashif, Mohammad Shahzad Samdani
{"title":"用高效液相色谱法控制各种正虹吸雄蕊叶提取物的质量:基于多变量和基于标记的分析技术","authors":"Mustofa Ahda,&nbsp;Irwandi Jaswir,&nbsp;Alfi Khatib,&nbsp;Qamar Uddin Ahmed,&nbsp;Nurkhasanah Mahfudh,&nbsp;Indro Prastowo,&nbsp;Mohd Salleh Rofiee,&nbsp;Mohammad Kashif,&nbsp;Mohammad Shahzad Samdani","doi":"10.1007/s12161-024-02738-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring herb quality is crucial for maintaining product consistency in herbal products. Marker-based analysis has traditionally been the preferred method for determining the chemical composition of medicinal plants due to its effectiveness. However, current challenges with marker-based analysis, such as high prices and difficulties in procurement, necessitate the application of multivariate-based approaches. Hence, this study aimed to compare marker-based and multivariate-based methods for quality control of an important plant used in traditional folk medicine, <i>Orthosiphon stamineus</i> leaf extracts. The results indicated that caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rosmarinic acid are effective markers for classifying potent extracts. The aqueous extract of <i>O. stamineus</i> leaf was found to contain the highest concentration of caffeic acid (3.898 ± 0.098 µg/mg), while the 40% ethanolic extract exhibited the highest levels of rosmarinic acid (1.627 ± 0.026 µg/mg) and chlorogenic acid (4.258 ± 0.049 µg/mg). Additionally, the multivariate-based analysis yielded clear distinctions between <i>O. stamineus</i> leaf extracts. It has acceptable parameters as indicated by determination coefficients R2X: 0.917, R2Y: 0.957, and Q2Y: 0.92. Based on these findings, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rosmarinic acid can serve as specific markers for α-glucosidase inhibitors, with rosmarinic acid also serving as a specific marker for sLOX inhibitors. Therefore, chromatography-based analysis, whether through multivariate data analysis or marker-based approaches, can be applied effectively for quality control of the <i>O. stamineus</i> leaf extracts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"18 4","pages":"552 - 563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Control of the Various Orthosiphon stamineus Leaf Extracts Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Multivariate-Based and Marker-Based Analytical Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Mustofa Ahda,&nbsp;Irwandi Jaswir,&nbsp;Alfi Khatib,&nbsp;Qamar Uddin Ahmed,&nbsp;Nurkhasanah Mahfudh,&nbsp;Indro Prastowo,&nbsp;Mohd Salleh Rofiee,&nbsp;Mohammad Kashif,&nbsp;Mohammad Shahzad Samdani\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12161-024-02738-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ensuring herb quality is crucial for maintaining product consistency in herbal products. Marker-based analysis has traditionally been the preferred method for determining the chemical composition of medicinal plants due to its effectiveness. However, current challenges with marker-based analysis, such as high prices and difficulties in procurement, necessitate the application of multivariate-based approaches. Hence, this study aimed to compare marker-based and multivariate-based methods for quality control of an important plant used in traditional folk medicine, <i>Orthosiphon stamineus</i> leaf extracts. The results indicated that caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rosmarinic acid are effective markers for classifying potent extracts. The aqueous extract of <i>O. stamineus</i> leaf was found to contain the highest concentration of caffeic acid (3.898 ± 0.098 µg/mg), while the 40% ethanolic extract exhibited the highest levels of rosmarinic acid (1.627 ± 0.026 µg/mg) and chlorogenic acid (4.258 ± 0.049 µg/mg). Additionally, the multivariate-based analysis yielded clear distinctions between <i>O. stamineus</i> leaf extracts. It has acceptable parameters as indicated by determination coefficients R2X: 0.917, R2Y: 0.957, and Q2Y: 0.92. Based on these findings, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rosmarinic acid can serve as specific markers for α-glucosidase inhibitors, with rosmarinic acid also serving as a specific marker for sLOX inhibitors. Therefore, chromatography-based analysis, whether through multivariate data analysis or marker-based approaches, can be applied effectively for quality control of the <i>O. stamineus</i> leaf extracts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"552 - 563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02738-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02738-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保草药质量对于保持草药产品的一致性至关重要。传统上,基于标记的分析由于其有效性而成为测定药用植物化学成分的首选方法。但是,目前基于标记的分析所面临的挑战,例如价格高和采购困难,需要采用基于多变量的方法。因此,本研究旨在比较基于标记和基于多变量的方法对传统医学中重要的植物——直虹吸管(Orthosiphon stamineus)叶提取物的质量控制。结果表明,咖啡酸、绿原酸和迷迭香酸是鉴别强效提取物的有效标记。水提液中咖啡酸含量最高(3.898±0.098µg/mg), 40%乙醇提液中迷迭香酸含量最高(1.627±0.026µg/mg),绿原酸含量最高(4.258±0.049µg/mg)。此外,基于多变量的分析得出了雄蕊花叶提取物之间的明显区别。确定系数R2X: 0.917, R2Y: 0.957, Q2Y: 0.92,参数可接受。基于这些发现,咖啡酸、绿原酸和迷迭香酸可以作为α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂的特异性标记物,迷迭香酸也可以作为sLOX抑制剂的特异性标记物。因此,基于色谱的分析方法,无论是多变量数据分析还是基于标记的分析方法,都可以有效地用于牡荆叶提取物的质量控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Control of the Various Orthosiphon stamineus Leaf Extracts Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Multivariate-Based and Marker-Based Analytical Techniques

Ensuring herb quality is crucial for maintaining product consistency in herbal products. Marker-based analysis has traditionally been the preferred method for determining the chemical composition of medicinal plants due to its effectiveness. However, current challenges with marker-based analysis, such as high prices and difficulties in procurement, necessitate the application of multivariate-based approaches. Hence, this study aimed to compare marker-based and multivariate-based methods for quality control of an important plant used in traditional folk medicine, Orthosiphon stamineus leaf extracts. The results indicated that caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rosmarinic acid are effective markers for classifying potent extracts. The aqueous extract of O. stamineus leaf was found to contain the highest concentration of caffeic acid (3.898 ± 0.098 µg/mg), while the 40% ethanolic extract exhibited the highest levels of rosmarinic acid (1.627 ± 0.026 µg/mg) and chlorogenic acid (4.258 ± 0.049 µg/mg). Additionally, the multivariate-based analysis yielded clear distinctions between O. stamineus leaf extracts. It has acceptable parameters as indicated by determination coefficients R2X: 0.917, R2Y: 0.957, and Q2Y: 0.92. Based on these findings, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and rosmarinic acid can serve as specific markers for α-glucosidase inhibitors, with rosmarinic acid also serving as a specific marker for sLOX inhibitors. Therefore, chromatography-based analysis, whether through multivariate data analysis or marker-based approaches, can be applied effectively for quality control of the O. stamineus leaf extracts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信