Chiara Kuijpers, Sven Sterken, Stephanie Van de Voorde
{"title":"二十世纪中期比利时教堂建设的工程作者和代理","authors":"Chiara Kuijpers, Sven Sterken, Stephanie Van de Voorde","doi":"10.1007/s44150-025-00136-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the evolving role of engineers in mid-twentieth century Belgian church construction, highlighting how their responsibilities were shaped by shifting institutional structures, economic constraints, and evolving professional hierarchies. Through three case studies—Saint Pius-X (Forest, 1962–1970), Notre-Dame de Stockel (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, 1962–1967), and Saint-Rita (Harelbeke, 1963–1967)— this paper reconstructs how engineers were appointed, how their roles evolved, and how their contributions intersected with procurement and oversight mechanisms. The findings reveal that engineering authorship was neither linear nor monolithic. Engineers operated within a fragmented decision-making network, where their influence depended on financial, procedural, and regulatory factors. At Saint Pius-X, prefabrication embedded structural expertise within manufacturing, minimizing the role of independent engineers. At Notre-Dame de Stockel, the lack of early oversight led to instability, eventually necessitating SECO’s intervention. Meanwhile, at Saint-Rita, the engineer played a key role in execution but had limited influence on the design, with SECO again ensuring technical precision. More broadly, the study situates these cases within mid-century construction trends, where prefabrication, standardization, and external quality control reinforced a shift from individual expertise to distributed decision-making. By reassessing the role of engineers not only as technical experts but as negotiators within complex construction landscapes, this paper offers a more nuanced understanding of authorship and collaboration in post-war architecture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering authorship and agency in mid-twentieth century Belgian church construction\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Kuijpers, Sven Sterken, Stephanie Van de Voorde\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44150-025-00136-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper examines the evolving role of engineers in mid-twentieth century Belgian church construction, highlighting how their responsibilities were shaped by shifting institutional structures, economic constraints, and evolving professional hierarchies. Through three case studies—Saint Pius-X (Forest, 1962–1970), Notre-Dame de Stockel (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, 1962–1967), and Saint-Rita (Harelbeke, 1963–1967)— this paper reconstructs how engineers were appointed, how their roles evolved, and how their contributions intersected with procurement and oversight mechanisms. The findings reveal that engineering authorship was neither linear nor monolithic. Engineers operated within a fragmented decision-making network, where their influence depended on financial, procedural, and regulatory factors. At Saint Pius-X, prefabrication embedded structural expertise within manufacturing, minimizing the role of independent engineers. At Notre-Dame de Stockel, the lack of early oversight led to instability, eventually necessitating SECO’s intervention. Meanwhile, at Saint-Rita, the engineer played a key role in execution but had limited influence on the design, with SECO again ensuring technical precision. More broadly, the study situates these cases within mid-century construction trends, where prefabrication, standardization, and external quality control reinforced a shift from individual expertise to distributed decision-making. By reassessing the role of engineers not only as technical experts but as negotiators within complex construction landscapes, this paper offers a more nuanced understanding of authorship and collaboration in post-war architecture.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00136-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00136-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文考察了工程师在二十世纪中期比利时教堂建设中的演变作用,强调了他们的责任是如何被不断变化的制度结构、经济约束和不断演变的专业等级所塑造的。通过三个案例研究——圣彼乌斯十世(Forest, 1962-1970)、圣斯托克尔圣母院(woluve - saint - pierre, 1962-1967)和圣丽塔(Harelbeke, 1963-1967)——本文重建了工程师是如何被任命的,他们的角色是如何演变的,以及他们的贡献是如何与采购和监督机制相交叉的。研究结果表明,工程作者既不是线性的,也不是整体的。工程师在一个支离破碎的决策网络中运作,他们的影响力取决于财务、程序和监管因素。在Saint Pius-X,预制嵌入了制造中的结构专业知识,最大限度地减少了独立工程师的作用。在巴黎圣母院,缺乏早期监督导致了不稳定,最终需要SECO的干预。与此同时,在圣丽塔,工程师在执行中发挥了关键作用,但对设计的影响有限,SECO再次确保了技术精度。更广泛地说,该研究将这些案例置于本世纪中叶的建筑趋势中,在这些趋势中,预制、标准化和外部质量控制加强了从个人专业知识到分布式决策的转变。通过重新评估工程师不仅作为技术专家,而且作为复杂建筑景观中的谈判者的角色,本文提供了对战后建筑中作者和合作的更细致入微的理解。
Engineering authorship and agency in mid-twentieth century Belgian church construction
This paper examines the evolving role of engineers in mid-twentieth century Belgian church construction, highlighting how their responsibilities were shaped by shifting institutional structures, economic constraints, and evolving professional hierarchies. Through three case studies—Saint Pius-X (Forest, 1962–1970), Notre-Dame de Stockel (Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, 1962–1967), and Saint-Rita (Harelbeke, 1963–1967)— this paper reconstructs how engineers were appointed, how their roles evolved, and how their contributions intersected with procurement and oversight mechanisms. The findings reveal that engineering authorship was neither linear nor monolithic. Engineers operated within a fragmented decision-making network, where their influence depended on financial, procedural, and regulatory factors. At Saint Pius-X, prefabrication embedded structural expertise within manufacturing, minimizing the role of independent engineers. At Notre-Dame de Stockel, the lack of early oversight led to instability, eventually necessitating SECO’s intervention. Meanwhile, at Saint-Rita, the engineer played a key role in execution but had limited influence on the design, with SECO again ensuring technical precision. More broadly, the study situates these cases within mid-century construction trends, where prefabrication, standardization, and external quality control reinforced a shift from individual expertise to distributed decision-making. By reassessing the role of engineers not only as technical experts but as negotiators within complex construction landscapes, this paper offers a more nuanced understanding of authorship and collaboration in post-war architecture.