{"title":"绘制地中海东部山区的滑坡易感性:机器学习视角","authors":"Hazem Ghassan Abdo, Sahar Mohammed Richi, Pankaj Prasad, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Bijay Halder, Arman Niknam, Hoang Thi Hang, Maged Muteb Alharbi, Javed Mallick","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing landslide susceptibility is essential in urban planning and risk management. In the context of the Eastern Mediterranean region, there is a continuing need to compare the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting landslide susceptibility, which can improve landslide risk management measures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive capabilities of three ML models: Multilayer perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models, in evaluating the susceptibility of various types of landslides and to refine the combination of causal factors. An evaluation of 19 conditioning factors, including topographical, geological, and environmental variables, was conducted to assess their effects on landslide susceptibility in different models in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results show that \"Elevation\" and \"Slope\" were consistently identified as the most influential factors in all models, with MLP demonstrating the greatest sensitivity to \"Elevation.\" The study area was divided into five susceptibility categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. According to the LGBM model, 24.27% of the area was classified as \"very low\" susceptibility, while the XGBoost and MLP models identified 25.69% and 27.28%, respectively. On the other hand, the \"very high\" susceptibility category covered 19.57%, 20.31%, and 19.78% of the area for the LGBM, XGBoost, and MLP models, respectively. The AUC-ROC approach has been utilized to evaluate, validate, and compare the performance of different ML models. Our study found AUC values for three MLTs. These findings suggest that all models demonstrate reasonable accuracy in identifying susceptible zones, and XGBoost demonstrated the best performance among the MLTs, with an AUC of 92.6% compared to the others. The insights gained from this study can inform targeted mitigation strategies to reduce landslide risks in Lebanon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping landslide susceptibility in the Eastern Mediterranean mountainous region: a machine learning perspective\",\"authors\":\"Hazem Ghassan Abdo, Sahar Mohammed Richi, Pankaj Prasad, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Bijay Halder, Arman Niknam, Hoang Thi Hang, Maged Muteb Alharbi, Javed Mallick\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assessing landslide susceptibility is essential in urban planning and risk management. In the context of the Eastern Mediterranean region, there is a continuing need to compare the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting landslide susceptibility, which can improve landslide risk management measures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive capabilities of three ML models: Multilayer perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models, in evaluating the susceptibility of various types of landslides and to refine the combination of causal factors. An evaluation of 19 conditioning factors, including topographical, geological, and environmental variables, was conducted to assess their effects on landslide susceptibility in different models in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results show that \\\"Elevation\\\" and \\\"Slope\\\" were consistently identified as the most influential factors in all models, with MLP demonstrating the greatest sensitivity to \\\"Elevation.\\\" The study area was divided into five susceptibility categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. According to the LGBM model, 24.27% of the area was classified as \\\"very low\\\" susceptibility, while the XGBoost and MLP models identified 25.69% and 27.28%, respectively. On the other hand, the \\\"very high\\\" susceptibility category covered 19.57%, 20.31%, and 19.78% of the area for the LGBM, XGBoost, and MLP models, respectively. The AUC-ROC approach has been utilized to evaluate, validate, and compare the performance of different ML models. Our study found AUC values for three MLTs. These findings suggest that all models demonstrate reasonable accuracy in identifying susceptible zones, and XGBoost demonstrated the best performance among the MLTs, with an AUC of 92.6% compared to the others. The insights gained from this study can inform targeted mitigation strategies to reduce landslide risks in Lebanon.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mapping landslide susceptibility in the Eastern Mediterranean mountainous region: a machine learning perspective
Assessing landslide susceptibility is essential in urban planning and risk management. In the context of the Eastern Mediterranean region, there is a continuing need to compare the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting landslide susceptibility, which can improve landslide risk management measures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive capabilities of three ML models: Multilayer perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models, in evaluating the susceptibility of various types of landslides and to refine the combination of causal factors. An evaluation of 19 conditioning factors, including topographical, geological, and environmental variables, was conducted to assess their effects on landslide susceptibility in different models in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results show that "Elevation" and "Slope" were consistently identified as the most influential factors in all models, with MLP demonstrating the greatest sensitivity to "Elevation." The study area was divided into five susceptibility categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. According to the LGBM model, 24.27% of the area was classified as "very low" susceptibility, while the XGBoost and MLP models identified 25.69% and 27.28%, respectively. On the other hand, the "very high" susceptibility category covered 19.57%, 20.31%, and 19.78% of the area for the LGBM, XGBoost, and MLP models, respectively. The AUC-ROC approach has been utilized to evaluate, validate, and compare the performance of different ML models. Our study found AUC values for three MLTs. These findings suggest that all models demonstrate reasonable accuracy in identifying susceptible zones, and XGBoost demonstrated the best performance among the MLTs, with an AUC of 92.6% compared to the others. The insights gained from this study can inform targeted mitigation strategies to reduce landslide risks in Lebanon.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.