绘制地中海东部山区的滑坡易感性:机器学习视角

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hazem Ghassan Abdo, Sahar Mohammed Richi, Pankaj Prasad, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Bijay Halder, Arman Niknam, Hoang Thi Hang, Maged Muteb Alharbi, Javed Mallick
{"title":"绘制地中海东部山区的滑坡易感性:机器学习视角","authors":"Hazem Ghassan Abdo,&nbsp;Sahar Mohammed Richi,&nbsp;Pankaj Prasad,&nbsp;Okan Mert Katipoğlu,&nbsp;Bijay Halder,&nbsp;Arman Niknam,&nbsp;Hoang Thi Hang,&nbsp;Maged Muteb Alharbi,&nbsp;Javed Mallick","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing landslide susceptibility is essential in urban planning and risk management. In the context of the Eastern Mediterranean region, there is a continuing need to compare the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting landslide susceptibility, which can improve landslide risk management measures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive capabilities of three ML models: Multilayer perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models, in evaluating the susceptibility of various types of landslides and to refine the combination of causal factors. An evaluation of 19 conditioning factors, including topographical, geological, and environmental variables, was conducted to assess their effects on landslide susceptibility in different models in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results show that \"Elevation\" and \"Slope\" were consistently identified as the most influential factors in all models, with MLP demonstrating the greatest sensitivity to \"Elevation.\" The study area was divided into five susceptibility categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. According to the LGBM model, 24.27% of the area was classified as \"very low\" susceptibility, while the XGBoost and MLP models identified 25.69% and 27.28%, respectively. On the other hand, the \"very high\" susceptibility category covered 19.57%, 20.31%, and 19.78% of the area for the LGBM, XGBoost, and MLP models, respectively. The AUC-ROC approach has been utilized to evaluate, validate, and compare the performance of different ML models. Our study found AUC values for three MLTs. These findings suggest that all models demonstrate reasonable accuracy in identifying susceptible zones, and XGBoost demonstrated the best performance among the MLTs, with an AUC of 92.6% compared to the others. The insights gained from this study can inform targeted mitigation strategies to reduce landslide risks in Lebanon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping landslide susceptibility in the Eastern Mediterranean mountainous region: a machine learning perspective\",\"authors\":\"Hazem Ghassan Abdo,&nbsp;Sahar Mohammed Richi,&nbsp;Pankaj Prasad,&nbsp;Okan Mert Katipoğlu,&nbsp;Bijay Halder,&nbsp;Arman Niknam,&nbsp;Hoang Thi Hang,&nbsp;Maged Muteb Alharbi,&nbsp;Javed Mallick\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assessing landslide susceptibility is essential in urban planning and risk management. In the context of the Eastern Mediterranean region, there is a continuing need to compare the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting landslide susceptibility, which can improve landslide risk management measures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive capabilities of three ML models: Multilayer perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models, in evaluating the susceptibility of various types of landslides and to refine the combination of causal factors. An evaluation of 19 conditioning factors, including topographical, geological, and environmental variables, was conducted to assess their effects on landslide susceptibility in different models in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results show that \\\"Elevation\\\" and \\\"Slope\\\" were consistently identified as the most influential factors in all models, with MLP demonstrating the greatest sensitivity to \\\"Elevation.\\\" The study area was divided into five susceptibility categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. According to the LGBM model, 24.27% of the area was classified as \\\"very low\\\" susceptibility, while the XGBoost and MLP models identified 25.69% and 27.28%, respectively. On the other hand, the \\\"very high\\\" susceptibility category covered 19.57%, 20.31%, and 19.78% of the area for the LGBM, XGBoost, and MLP models, respectively. The AUC-ROC approach has been utilized to evaluate, validate, and compare the performance of different ML models. Our study found AUC values for three MLTs. These findings suggest that all models demonstrate reasonable accuracy in identifying susceptible zones, and XGBoost demonstrated the best performance among the MLTs, with an AUC of 92.6% compared to the others. The insights gained from this study can inform targeted mitigation strategies to reduce landslide risks in Lebanon.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12242-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估滑坡易感性在城市规划和风险管理中是必不可少的。在东地中海地区的背景下,持续需要比较机器学习(ML)算法在预测滑坡易感性方面的性能,这可以改善滑坡风险管理措施。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较多层感知机(MLP)、光梯度增强机(LGBM)和极端梯度增强(XGBoost)三种机器学习模型在评估不同类型滑坡易感性方面的预测能力,并完善因果因素的组合。在地理信息系统(GIS)环境下,对地形、地质和环境变量等19个条件因子进行了评价,以评估它们在不同模型下对滑坡易感性的影响。结果表明,在所有模型中,“高程”和“坡度”都被一致认定为影响最大的因子,其中MLP对“高程”的敏感性最大。研究区被分为5个易感性类别:极低、低、中等、高和极高。根据LGBM模型,24.27%的区域被划分为“非常低”易感性,而XGBoost和MLP模型分别为25.69%和27.28%。另一方面,LGBM、XGBoost和MLP模型的“非常高”敏感性类别分别占19.57%、20.31%和19.78%。AUC-ROC方法已被用于评估、验证和比较不同ML模型的性能。我们的研究发现了三个mlt的AUC值。这些结果表明,所有模型在识别敏感区域方面都具有合理的准确性,其中XGBoost在mlt中表现最好,与其他模型相比,AUC为92.6%。从这项研究中获得的见解可以为有针对性的缓解战略提供信息,以减少黎巴嫩的山体滑坡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping landslide susceptibility in the Eastern Mediterranean mountainous region: a machine learning perspective

Assessing landslide susceptibility is essential in urban planning and risk management. In the context of the Eastern Mediterranean region, there is a continuing need to compare the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting landslide susceptibility, which can improve landslide risk management measures. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate and compare the predictive capabilities of three ML models: Multilayer perceptron (MLP), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models, in evaluating the susceptibility of various types of landslides and to refine the combination of causal factors. An evaluation of 19 conditioning factors, including topographical, geological, and environmental variables, was conducted to assess their effects on landslide susceptibility in different models in a geographic information system (GIS) environment. The results show that "Elevation" and "Slope" were consistently identified as the most influential factors in all models, with MLP demonstrating the greatest sensitivity to "Elevation." The study area was divided into five susceptibility categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. According to the LGBM model, 24.27% of the area was classified as "very low" susceptibility, while the XGBoost and MLP models identified 25.69% and 27.28%, respectively. On the other hand, the "very high" susceptibility category covered 19.57%, 20.31%, and 19.78% of the area for the LGBM, XGBoost, and MLP models, respectively. The AUC-ROC approach has been utilized to evaluate, validate, and compare the performance of different ML models. Our study found AUC values for three MLTs. These findings suggest that all models demonstrate reasonable accuracy in identifying susceptible zones, and XGBoost demonstrated the best performance among the MLTs, with an AUC of 92.6% compared to the others. The insights gained from this study can inform targeted mitigation strategies to reduce landslide risks in Lebanon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信