可持续山区发展的价值链:对23个欧洲案例的定性理解

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Kirsty Blackstock , Rachel Creaney , Mar del Mar Delgado-Serrano , Sharon Flanigan , Corrado Ievoli , Michele Moretti , Gusztáv Nemes , Diana Surovà , Chloe Thompson , Lukas Zagata , Tarek Allali , Angelo Belliggiano , Ana Carvalho , Ana Paula Conte , Catarina Esgalhado , Anna Geiser , Jakub Husák , Sandra Karner , Carmen Maestre-Diaz , Raquel Moreno Vicente , Tamara Zivadinovic
{"title":"可持续山区发展的价值链:对23个欧洲案例的定性理解","authors":"Kirsty Blackstock ,&nbsp;Rachel Creaney ,&nbsp;Mar del Mar Delgado-Serrano ,&nbsp;Sharon Flanigan ,&nbsp;Corrado Ievoli ,&nbsp;Michele Moretti ,&nbsp;Gusztáv Nemes ,&nbsp;Diana Surovà ,&nbsp;Chloe Thompson ,&nbsp;Lukas Zagata ,&nbsp;Tarek Allali ,&nbsp;Angelo Belliggiano ,&nbsp;Ana Carvalho ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Conte ,&nbsp;Catarina Esgalhado ,&nbsp;Anna Geiser ,&nbsp;Jakub Husák ,&nbsp;Sandra Karner ,&nbsp;Carmen Maestre-Diaz ,&nbsp;Raquel Moreno Vicente ,&nbsp;Tamara Zivadinovic","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents findings using a novel, qualitative and interpretative approach to value chain assessment. The approach was used to further understand sustainable mountain development. The findings result from 23 diverse cases across 16 European countries, including value chains that focus on animal production for meat and dairy products, arable, horticultural and alcohol production as well as tourism and public goods. The paper focuses on three types of value (economic, socio-cultural and environmental) that are developed along the four stages of each value chain (Production, Processing, Distribution/Marketing and Consumption). It addresses how and why value chain actors perceived changes to these three types of values, including how the value chain is tele-coupled with other sending or receiving systems; and how the focal value chains intertwine with other mountain value chains. In general, the value chains actors’ perceived that positive values were added, supporting sustainable mountain development in our cases, but the findings were most positive for economic issues and least positive for environmental issues. Findings support neo-endogenous rural development arguments. Local cooperation and certification of sustainable practices seem to support valorisation and retain these values in the mountains. We contend that using a value chain lens for mountain development has helped improve the breadth of analysis and highlights the need to consider non-mountain actors and processes within sustainable development processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103640"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value chains for sustainable mountain development: a qualitative understanding of 23 European cases\",\"authors\":\"Kirsty Blackstock ,&nbsp;Rachel Creaney ,&nbsp;Mar del Mar Delgado-Serrano ,&nbsp;Sharon Flanigan ,&nbsp;Corrado Ievoli ,&nbsp;Michele Moretti ,&nbsp;Gusztáv Nemes ,&nbsp;Diana Surovà ,&nbsp;Chloe Thompson ,&nbsp;Lukas Zagata ,&nbsp;Tarek Allali ,&nbsp;Angelo Belliggiano ,&nbsp;Ana Carvalho ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Conte ,&nbsp;Catarina Esgalhado ,&nbsp;Anna Geiser ,&nbsp;Jakub Husák ,&nbsp;Sandra Karner ,&nbsp;Carmen Maestre-Diaz ,&nbsp;Raquel Moreno Vicente ,&nbsp;Tamara Zivadinovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents findings using a novel, qualitative and interpretative approach to value chain assessment. The approach was used to further understand sustainable mountain development. The findings result from 23 diverse cases across 16 European countries, including value chains that focus on animal production for meat and dairy products, arable, horticultural and alcohol production as well as tourism and public goods. The paper focuses on three types of value (economic, socio-cultural and environmental) that are developed along the four stages of each value chain (Production, Processing, Distribution/Marketing and Consumption). It addresses how and why value chain actors perceived changes to these three types of values, including how the value chain is tele-coupled with other sending or receiving systems; and how the focal value chains intertwine with other mountain value chains. In general, the value chains actors’ perceived that positive values were added, supporting sustainable mountain development in our cases, but the findings were most positive for economic issues and least positive for environmental issues. Findings support neo-endogenous rural development arguments. Local cooperation and certification of sustainable practices seem to support valorisation and retain these values in the mountains. We contend that using a value chain lens for mountain development has helped improve the breadth of analysis and highlights the need to consider non-mountain actors and processes within sustainable development processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000804\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000804","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新的、定性的和解释性的价值链评估方法。该方法被用于进一步了解可持续山区发展。研究结果来自16个欧洲国家的23个不同案例,包括专注于肉类和乳制品动物生产、耕地、园艺和酒精生产以及旅游和公共产品的价值链。本文侧重于沿着每个价值链(生产,加工,分销/营销和消费)的四个阶段开发的三种类型的价值(经济,社会文化和环境)。它解决了价值链参与者如何以及为什么感知到这三种类型价值的变化,包括价值链如何与其他发送或接收系统远程耦合;重点价值链如何与其他山地价值链交织在一起。总体而言,价值链参与者认为增加了积极的价值,在我们的案例中支持可持续山区发展,但研究结果对经济问题最积极,对环境问题最不积极。研究结果支持新内生农村发展的观点。当地合作和可持续实践的认证似乎支持了这些价值在山区的增值和保留。我们认为,在山区发展中使用价值链视角有助于提高分析的广度,并突出了在可持续发展进程中考虑非山区行为者和进程的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value chains for sustainable mountain development: a qualitative understanding of 23 European cases
This paper presents findings using a novel, qualitative and interpretative approach to value chain assessment. The approach was used to further understand sustainable mountain development. The findings result from 23 diverse cases across 16 European countries, including value chains that focus on animal production for meat and dairy products, arable, horticultural and alcohol production as well as tourism and public goods. The paper focuses on three types of value (economic, socio-cultural and environmental) that are developed along the four stages of each value chain (Production, Processing, Distribution/Marketing and Consumption). It addresses how and why value chain actors perceived changes to these three types of values, including how the value chain is tele-coupled with other sending or receiving systems; and how the focal value chains intertwine with other mountain value chains. In general, the value chains actors’ perceived that positive values were added, supporting sustainable mountain development in our cases, but the findings were most positive for economic issues and least positive for environmental issues. Findings support neo-endogenous rural development arguments. Local cooperation and certification of sustainable practices seem to support valorisation and retain these values in the mountains. We contend that using a value chain lens for mountain development has helped improve the breadth of analysis and highlights the need to consider non-mountain actors and processes within sustainable development processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信