利用SOFC和ICE热电联产技术探索湿式生物质气化的潜力:工艺设计、模拟和比较热力学分析

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mauro Prestipino , Orlando Corigliano , Antonio Galvagno , Antonio Piccolo , Petronilla Fragiacomo
{"title":"利用SOFC和ICE热电联产技术探索湿式生物质气化的潜力:工艺设计、模拟和比较热力学分析","authors":"Mauro Prestipino ,&nbsp;Orlando Corigliano ,&nbsp;Antonio Galvagno ,&nbsp;Antonio Piccolo ,&nbsp;Petronilla Fragiacomo","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research undertakes the engineering, detailed simulation, and thermodynamic analysis of an integrated cogeneration system based on wet biomass gasification, coupled with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) power units. The selection of wet biomass feedstock introduces originality from an energy perspective, presenting significant challenges in process integration while offering new avenues for the sustainable utilization of such residues. The layouts are designed to ensure energy self-sustainability.</div><div>The modeling development culminates in a comprehensive algorithm that captures the system's complexities, with each power unit mapped and analyzed. Matlab is employed for simulating and analyzing the SOFC, which is fundamental for selecting the working point and scaling up the plant, while ICE is modeled using a data-driven approach. The integrated systems are simulated using AVEVA PRO/II Simulation software. A comparative thermodynamic analysis is performed between the two system layouts to assess strengths and weaknesses.</div><div>Salient numerical results indicate a net electric yield of 1.41 MWh·t<sub>db</sub><sup>−1</sup> and 0.91 MWh·t<sub>db</sub><sup>−1</sup> for SOFC and ICE layouts respectively. The exergy efficiencies are 28.9 % and 18.7 % for the SOFC and ICE systems, respectively, while the sustainability indexes are 1.37 and 1.23.</div><div>The detailed exergy analysis detects the primary sources of irreversibilities and identifies opportunities for energetic improvements in both layouts.</div><div>This work serves as a methodological guide for designing integrated wet biomass gasifier-SOFC/ICE systems, offering insight into the Balance of Plant energy behavior, developing case studies, and addressing gaps in the literature on comparing these processes under identical conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"392 ","pages":"Article 125998"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the potential of wet biomass gasification with SOFC and ICE cogeneration technologies: process design, simulation and comparative thermodynamic analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mauro Prestipino ,&nbsp;Orlando Corigliano ,&nbsp;Antonio Galvagno ,&nbsp;Antonio Piccolo ,&nbsp;Petronilla Fragiacomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research undertakes the engineering, detailed simulation, and thermodynamic analysis of an integrated cogeneration system based on wet biomass gasification, coupled with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) power units. The selection of wet biomass feedstock introduces originality from an energy perspective, presenting significant challenges in process integration while offering new avenues for the sustainable utilization of such residues. The layouts are designed to ensure energy self-sustainability.</div><div>The modeling development culminates in a comprehensive algorithm that captures the system's complexities, with each power unit mapped and analyzed. Matlab is employed for simulating and analyzing the SOFC, which is fundamental for selecting the working point and scaling up the plant, while ICE is modeled using a data-driven approach. The integrated systems are simulated using AVEVA PRO/II Simulation software. A comparative thermodynamic analysis is performed between the two system layouts to assess strengths and weaknesses.</div><div>Salient numerical results indicate a net electric yield of 1.41 MWh·t<sub>db</sub><sup>−1</sup> and 0.91 MWh·t<sub>db</sub><sup>−1</sup> for SOFC and ICE layouts respectively. The exergy efficiencies are 28.9 % and 18.7 % for the SOFC and ICE systems, respectively, while the sustainability indexes are 1.37 and 1.23.</div><div>The detailed exergy analysis detects the primary sources of irreversibilities and identifies opportunities for energetic improvements in both layouts.</div><div>This work serves as a methodological guide for designing integrated wet biomass gasifier-SOFC/ICE systems, offering insight into the Balance of Plant energy behavior, developing case studies, and addressing gaps in the literature on comparing these processes under identical conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"392 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925007287\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925007287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对基于湿生物质气化,结合固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC)和内燃机(ICE)动力单元的集成热电联产系统进行了工程、详细模拟和热力学分析。湿生物质原料的选择从能源角度引入了独创性,在过程集成方面提出了重大挑战,同时为此类残留物的可持续利用提供了新的途径。布局的设计是为了确保能源的自我可持续性。建模开发最终形成了一个全面的算法,该算法捕获了系统的复杂性,并对每个电源单元进行了映射和分析。利用Matlab对SOFC进行仿真和分析,这是选择工作点和扩大工厂规模的基础,而ICE则采用数据驱动的方法建模。使用AVEVA PRO/II仿真软件对集成系统进行仿真。对两种系统布局进行了比较热力学分析,以评估其优缺点。显著的数值结果表明,SOFC和ICE布局的净发电量分别为1.41 MWh·tdb - 1和0.91 MWh·tdb - 1。SOFC和ICE系统的火用效率分别为28.9%和18.7%,可持续性指数分别为1.37和1.23。详细的能源分析检测了不可逆性的主要来源,并确定了两种布局的能源改进机会。这项工作为设计集成的湿生物质气化炉- sofc /ICE系统提供了方法论指导,提供了对植物能量行为平衡的见解,开发了案例研究,并解决了在相同条件下比较这些过程的文献中的空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the potential of wet biomass gasification with SOFC and ICE cogeneration technologies: process design, simulation and comparative thermodynamic analysis

Exploring the potential of wet biomass gasification with SOFC and ICE cogeneration technologies: process design, simulation and comparative thermodynamic analysis
This research undertakes the engineering, detailed simulation, and thermodynamic analysis of an integrated cogeneration system based on wet biomass gasification, coupled with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) and Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) power units. The selection of wet biomass feedstock introduces originality from an energy perspective, presenting significant challenges in process integration while offering new avenues for the sustainable utilization of such residues. The layouts are designed to ensure energy self-sustainability.
The modeling development culminates in a comprehensive algorithm that captures the system's complexities, with each power unit mapped and analyzed. Matlab is employed for simulating and analyzing the SOFC, which is fundamental for selecting the working point and scaling up the plant, while ICE is modeled using a data-driven approach. The integrated systems are simulated using AVEVA PRO/II Simulation software. A comparative thermodynamic analysis is performed between the two system layouts to assess strengths and weaknesses.
Salient numerical results indicate a net electric yield of 1.41 MWh·tdb−1 and 0.91 MWh·tdb−1 for SOFC and ICE layouts respectively. The exergy efficiencies are 28.9 % and 18.7 % for the SOFC and ICE systems, respectively, while the sustainability indexes are 1.37 and 1.23.
The detailed exergy analysis detects the primary sources of irreversibilities and identifies opportunities for energetic improvements in both layouts.
This work serves as a methodological guide for designing integrated wet biomass gasifier-SOFC/ICE systems, offering insight into the Balance of Plant energy behavior, developing case studies, and addressing gaps in the literature on comparing these processes under identical conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信