Nikolaos D. Karaferis , Vasileios E. Melissianos , Konstantinos Bakalis , Athanasia K. Kazantzi , Dimitrios Vamvatsikos
{"title":"原油炼油厂试验台地震风险评估:可选脆弱性方法","authors":"Nikolaos D. Karaferis , Vasileios E. Melissianos , Konstantinos Bakalis , Athanasia K. Kazantzi , Dimitrios Vamvatsikos","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A crude oil refinery is employed as a benchmark to test a fundamental assumption in the seismic risk assessment of asset portfolios, i.e., that a fragility function can characterize an asset (or class thereof) with negligible loss of fidelity. Although this is often taken as granted, it also implies that one should not care about breaking the correlation in response that should exist between similar assets subjected to the same ground motion. After all, this is a direct consequence of the summarization of multiple structural analysis results into a single fragility curve that is only parameterized by the (typically scalar) intensity measure. The alternative is to separately consider individual ground motion records and only aggregate per-record results at the final level of impact metrics. Stacking the deck against the conventional approach, a refinery offers an ideal testbed of interconnected assets and multiple refining processes. The results highlight that wherever multiple similar or identical assets are involved in a system disruption, breaking their record-to-record response correlation can severely bias the assessment results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 105495"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic risk assessment of a crude oil refinery testbed: Alternative fragility approaches\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos D. Karaferis , Vasileios E. Melissianos , Konstantinos Bakalis , Athanasia K. Kazantzi , Dimitrios Vamvatsikos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A crude oil refinery is employed as a benchmark to test a fundamental assumption in the seismic risk assessment of asset portfolios, i.e., that a fragility function can characterize an asset (or class thereof) with negligible loss of fidelity. Although this is often taken as granted, it also implies that one should not care about breaking the correlation in response that should exist between similar assets subjected to the same ground motion. After all, this is a direct consequence of the summarization of multiple structural analysis results into a single fragility curve that is only parameterized by the (typically scalar) intensity measure. The alternative is to separately consider individual ground motion records and only aggregate per-record results at the final level of impact metrics. Stacking the deck against the conventional approach, a refinery offers an ideal testbed of interconnected assets and multiple refining processes. The results highlight that wherever multiple similar or identical assets are involved in a system disruption, breaking their record-to-record response correlation can severely bias the assessment results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of disaster risk reduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242092500319X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221242092500319X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Seismic risk assessment of a crude oil refinery testbed: Alternative fragility approaches
A crude oil refinery is employed as a benchmark to test a fundamental assumption in the seismic risk assessment of asset portfolios, i.e., that a fragility function can characterize an asset (or class thereof) with negligible loss of fidelity. Although this is often taken as granted, it also implies that one should not care about breaking the correlation in response that should exist between similar assets subjected to the same ground motion. After all, this is a direct consequence of the summarization of multiple structural analysis results into a single fragility curve that is only parameterized by the (typically scalar) intensity measure. The alternative is to separately consider individual ground motion records and only aggregate per-record results at the final level of impact metrics. Stacking the deck against the conventional approach, a refinery offers an ideal testbed of interconnected assets and multiple refining processes. The results highlight that wherever multiple similar or identical assets are involved in a system disruption, breaking their record-to-record response correlation can severely bias the assessment results.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.