加纳从事家庭血压监测的孕妇的感知、客观和应用计算能力

Emma R. Lawrence MD , Sanaya Irani BS , Betty Nartey MPH , Brittney Collins BS , Elorm Segbedzi-Rich MD , Andrea Pangori MS , Titus K. Beyuo MD , Cheryl A. Moyer PhD , Jody R. Lori PhD , Samuel A. Oppong MD
{"title":"加纳从事家庭血压监测的孕妇的感知、客观和应用计算能力","authors":"Emma R. Lawrence MD ,&nbsp;Sanaya Irani BS ,&nbsp;Betty Nartey MPH ,&nbsp;Brittney Collins BS ,&nbsp;Elorm Segbedzi-Rich MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Pangori MS ,&nbsp;Titus K. Beyuo MD ,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Moyer PhD ,&nbsp;Jody R. Lori PhD ,&nbsp;Samuel A. Oppong MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Since elevated blood pressure is often a first presenting sign, a major function of antenatal care is frequent blood pressure monitoring. A newer approach to this—patient-performed home monitoring—has not been widely implemented in low- and middle-income countries, including Ghana. Patient numeracy levels that are sufficient to understand and interpret home blood pressure values are a critical component of a successful home monitoring intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate perceived, objective, and applied numeracy to identify elevated blood pressure values among pregnant women engaged in home blood pressure monitoring in Ghana.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Participants were 80 pregnant women at a tertiary hospital in Accra, Ghana. After training, participants engaged in home blood pressure monitoring for 2 to 4 weeks. A post-monitoring survey evaluated confidence and experience interpreting blood pressure values, a validated numeracy scale, and interpretation of blood pressure monitor outputs—half with numbers only and half with both numbers and colors. Mean correct responses on numbers only and numbers and colors outputs were compared. Linear regression evaluated predictors of correct interpretation of blood pressures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On a validated numeracy scale, mean score was 16.73 (SD: 6.01) out of 25, with 73.8% (n=59) having numeracy. Perceived ability was high, with 70.9% (n=56) definitely believing they could interpret blood pressures values. However, on objective evaluation, only 36.3% (n=29) correctly identified the cutoff for elevated systolic and 26.3% (n=21) for elevated diastolic blood pressure values. Out of eight displayed blood pressure monitor outputs, correct identification was significantly higher on outputs with both numbers and colors (μ=7.19, σ=0.81) compared to numbers only (μ=6.54, σ=1.35). On an adjusted linear regression, only scores on the numeracy scale had a significant yet small association with correctly identifying blood pressure monitor outputs (β 0.07, <em>P</em>=.025).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Home blood pressure monitoring would benefit from monitors with both numerical and color-coded output. Focused training, rather than education level or general numeracy, may best predict blood pressure interpretation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived, objective, and applied numeracy among pregnant women engaged in home blood pressure monitoring in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Emma R. Lawrence MD ,&nbsp;Sanaya Irani BS ,&nbsp;Betty Nartey MPH ,&nbsp;Brittney Collins BS ,&nbsp;Elorm Segbedzi-Rich MD ,&nbsp;Andrea Pangori MS ,&nbsp;Titus K. Beyuo MD ,&nbsp;Cheryl A. Moyer PhD ,&nbsp;Jody R. Lori PhD ,&nbsp;Samuel A. Oppong MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Since elevated blood pressure is often a first presenting sign, a major function of antenatal care is frequent blood pressure monitoring. A newer approach to this—patient-performed home monitoring—has not been widely implemented in low- and middle-income countries, including Ghana. Patient numeracy levels that are sufficient to understand and interpret home blood pressure values are a critical component of a successful home monitoring intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate perceived, objective, and applied numeracy to identify elevated blood pressure values among pregnant women engaged in home blood pressure monitoring in Ghana.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Participants were 80 pregnant women at a tertiary hospital in Accra, Ghana. After training, participants engaged in home blood pressure monitoring for 2 to 4 weeks. A post-monitoring survey evaluated confidence and experience interpreting blood pressure values, a validated numeracy scale, and interpretation of blood pressure monitor outputs—half with numbers only and half with both numbers and colors. Mean correct responses on numbers only and numbers and colors outputs were compared. Linear regression evaluated predictors of correct interpretation of blood pressures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>On a validated numeracy scale, mean score was 16.73 (SD: 6.01) out of 25, with 73.8% (n=59) having numeracy. Perceived ability was high, with 70.9% (n=56) definitely believing they could interpret blood pressures values. However, on objective evaluation, only 36.3% (n=29) correctly identified the cutoff for elevated systolic and 26.3% (n=21) for elevated diastolic blood pressure values. Out of eight displayed blood pressure monitor outputs, correct identification was significantly higher on outputs with both numbers and colors (μ=7.19, σ=0.81) compared to numbers only (μ=6.54, σ=1.35). On an adjusted linear regression, only scores on the numeracy scale had a significant yet small association with correctly identifying blood pressure monitor outputs (β 0.07, <em>P</em>=.025).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Home blood pressure monitoring would benefit from monitors with both numerical and color-coded output. Focused training, rather than education level or general numeracy, may best predict blood pressure interpretation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOG global reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景妊娠期高血压疾病与孕产妇和新生儿预后不良相关。由于血压升高通常是第一个出现的迹象,产前保健的一个主要功能是经常监测血压。在包括加纳在内的低收入和中等收入国家,一种较新的方法——患者自行进行家庭监测——尚未得到广泛实施。患者的计算水平足以理解和解释家庭血压值是成功的家庭监测干预的关键组成部分。目的评估加纳从事家庭血压监测的孕妇的感知、客观和应用计算能力,以识别血压升高值。研究设计参与者为80名在加纳阿克拉一家三级医院的孕妇。训练结束后,参与者进行2 - 4周的家庭血压监测。监测后的调查评估了解释血压值的信心和经验、有效的计算量表和对血压监测仪输出的解释——一半只使用数字,一半同时使用数字和颜色。对数字和数字和颜色输出的平均正确反应进行比较。线性回归评估正确解释血压的预测因子。结果在经验证的计算能力量表中,25人的平均得分为16.73 (SD: 6.01),其中73.8% (n=59)的人具有计算能力。感知能力高,70.9% (n=56)绝对相信他们可以解释血压值。然而,在客观评估中,只有36.3% (n=29)的患者正确识别收缩压升高的临界值,26.3% (n=21)的患者正确识别舒张压升高的临界值。在8个显示的血压计输出中,同时显示数字和颜色的输出(μ=7.19, σ=0.81)的正确率明显高于仅显示数字的输出(μ=6.54, σ=1.35)。在调整后的线性回归中,只有计算量表得分与正确识别血压监测仪输出有显著但很小的关联(β 0.07, P= 0.025)。结论家庭血压监测应采用数字和彩色编码输出的监测仪。重点训练,而不是教育水平或一般的计算能力,可能最能预测血压的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived, objective, and applied numeracy among pregnant women engaged in home blood pressure monitoring in Ghana

Background

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Since elevated blood pressure is often a first presenting sign, a major function of antenatal care is frequent blood pressure monitoring. A newer approach to this—patient-performed home monitoring—has not been widely implemented in low- and middle-income countries, including Ghana. Patient numeracy levels that are sufficient to understand and interpret home blood pressure values are a critical component of a successful home monitoring intervention.

Objective

To evaluate perceived, objective, and applied numeracy to identify elevated blood pressure values among pregnant women engaged in home blood pressure monitoring in Ghana.

Study Design

Participants were 80 pregnant women at a tertiary hospital in Accra, Ghana. After training, participants engaged in home blood pressure monitoring for 2 to 4 weeks. A post-monitoring survey evaluated confidence and experience interpreting blood pressure values, a validated numeracy scale, and interpretation of blood pressure monitor outputs—half with numbers only and half with both numbers and colors. Mean correct responses on numbers only and numbers and colors outputs were compared. Linear regression evaluated predictors of correct interpretation of blood pressures.

Results

On a validated numeracy scale, mean score was 16.73 (SD: 6.01) out of 25, with 73.8% (n=59) having numeracy. Perceived ability was high, with 70.9% (n=56) definitely believing they could interpret blood pressures values. However, on objective evaluation, only 36.3% (n=29) correctly identified the cutoff for elevated systolic and 26.3% (n=21) for elevated diastolic blood pressure values. Out of eight displayed blood pressure monitor outputs, correct identification was significantly higher on outputs with both numbers and colors (μ=7.19, σ=0.81) compared to numbers only (μ=6.54, σ=1.35). On an adjusted linear regression, only scores on the numeracy scale had a significant yet small association with correctly identifying blood pressure monitor outputs (β 0.07, P=.025).

Conclusion

Home blood pressure monitoring would benefit from monitors with both numerical and color-coded output. Focused training, rather than education level or general numeracy, may best predict blood pressure interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信