低能量体外冲击波治疗根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍的前瞻性随机研究。

Torben Brøchner Pedersen,Caroline Secher,Ali Moumneh,Nanna Hvid,Martin Lund,Grzegorz Fojecki,Lars Lund
{"title":"低能量体外冲击波治疗根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍的前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Torben Brøchner Pedersen,Caroline Secher,Ali Moumneh,Nanna Hvid,Martin Lund,Grzegorz Fojecki,Lars Lund","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo evaluate the efficacy of low-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-SWT) compared with a sham treatment in improving erectile function in men after radical prostatectomy. Erectile function was assessed using the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at baseline and 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nA total of 75 participants were randomized to either LI-SWT or sham treatment. Data were analyzed using a zero-inflated negative binomial model for IIEF scores and appropriate nonparametric methods for the ordinal EHS data, including binary transformation for clinically relevant outcomes.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe zero-inflated model for IIEF scores showed no significant difference between treatment groups with a ratio of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.1-2.4, P  =  .469). At 24 weeks post-treatment, the estimated median IIEF score was 4 in the LI-SWT group compared with 4 in the sham group. For EHS, no significant treatment effect was found, with median scores at 24 weeks of 2 in the LI-SWT group vs 2 in the sham group. The proportion of patients achieving sufficient erection hardness (EHS ≥3) at 24 weeks was 18% (95% CI: 9%-34%) in the LI-SWT group vs 26% (95% CI: 14%-43%) in the sham group (P = .552).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in erectile function for men undergoing LI-SWT compared with sham treatment after radical prostatectomy.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"14 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Randomized Study on Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Torben Brøchner Pedersen,Caroline Secher,Ali Moumneh,Nanna Hvid,Martin Lund,Grzegorz Fojecki,Lars Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ju.0000000000004576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nTo evaluate the efficacy of low-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-SWT) compared with a sham treatment in improving erectile function in men after radical prostatectomy. Erectile function was assessed using the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at baseline and 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\r\\nA total of 75 participants were randomized to either LI-SWT or sham treatment. Data were analyzed using a zero-inflated negative binomial model for IIEF scores and appropriate nonparametric methods for the ordinal EHS data, including binary transformation for clinically relevant outcomes.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe zero-inflated model for IIEF scores showed no significant difference between treatment groups with a ratio of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.1-2.4, P  =  .469). At 24 weeks post-treatment, the estimated median IIEF score was 4 in the LI-SWT group compared with 4 in the sham group. For EHS, no significant treatment effect was found, with median scores at 24 weeks of 2 in the LI-SWT group vs 2 in the sham group. The proportion of patients achieving sufficient erection hardness (EHS ≥3) at 24 weeks was 18% (95% CI: 9%-34%) in the LI-SWT group vs 26% (95% CI: 14%-43%) in the sham group (P = .552).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThis study did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in erectile function for men undergoing LI-SWT compared with sham treatment after radical prostatectomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"101097JU0000000000004576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价低能量体外冲击波治疗(LI-SWT)与假治疗在改善男性根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能方面的疗效。在基线和治疗后4,12和24周,使用勃起硬度评分(EHS)和国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)评估勃起功能。材料和方法共75名受试者被随机分为LI-SWT组和假治疗组。使用零膨胀负二项模型对IIEF评分进行分析,并使用适当的非参数方法对有序EHS数据进行分析,包括对临床相关结果进行二进制转换。结果IIEF评分的零膨胀模型各组间差异无统计学意义,比值为1.2 (95% CI: 0.1 ~ 2.4, P = 0.469)。在治疗后24周,LI-SWT组估计的IIEF中位数评分为4,而假手术组为4。对于EHS,没有发现明显的治疗效果,LI-SWT组在第2周时的中位评分为2,而sham组为2。24周达到足够勃起硬度(EHS≥3)的患者比例在LI-SWT组为18% (95% CI: 9%-34%),而假手术组为26% (95% CI: 14%-43%) (P = 0.552)。结论:本研究未发现在根治性前列腺切除术后,与假治疗相比,接受LI-SWT治疗的男性勃起功能有统计学意义的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prospective Randomized Study on Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy.
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of low-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-SWT) compared with a sham treatment in improving erectile function in men after radical prostatectomy. Erectile function was assessed using the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at baseline and 4, 12, and 24 weeks after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 75 participants were randomized to either LI-SWT or sham treatment. Data were analyzed using a zero-inflated negative binomial model for IIEF scores and appropriate nonparametric methods for the ordinal EHS data, including binary transformation for clinically relevant outcomes. RESULTS The zero-inflated model for IIEF scores showed no significant difference between treatment groups with a ratio of 1.2 (95% CI: 0.1-2.4, P  =  .469). At 24 weeks post-treatment, the estimated median IIEF score was 4 in the LI-SWT group compared with 4 in the sham group. For EHS, no significant treatment effect was found, with median scores at 24 weeks of 2 in the LI-SWT group vs 2 in the sham group. The proportion of patients achieving sufficient erection hardness (EHS ≥3) at 24 weeks was 18% (95% CI: 9%-34%) in the LI-SWT group vs 26% (95% CI: 14%-43%) in the sham group (P = .552). CONCLUSIONS This study did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in erectile function for men undergoing LI-SWT compared with sham treatment after radical prostatectomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信