Dominique L. Chaput , Kerr Clarkson , Linda Bagrade , Aleksandra Marek , Dennis Kelly , David Watson , Tom Steele , Alistair Leanord
{"title":"逆转和控制某高危医院病房长时间关闭重建后水系统微生物增殖","authors":"Dominique L. Chaput , Kerr Clarkson , Linda Bagrade , Aleksandra Marek , Dennis Kelly , David Watson , Tom Steele , Alistair Leanord","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens occur naturally in water but can pose a health risk to hospital patients who are more vulnerable due to illness or treatment. Ward closure periods can lead to microbial proliferation within water systems, posing a challenge to hospital estates and infection control teams. Following the 3-year closure of our paediatric haemato-oncology ward, water testing showed high total viable counts (TVCs) in over 20 % of samples and elevated counts of numerous Gram negative bacterial species (GNBs) in 73 % of samples, despite daily flushing and continuous chlorine dioxide dosing. We aimed to determine the extent of microbial proliferation, measure the impact of three sequential interventions (system disinfections with chlorine, with silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide, and then tap replacement), and assess the long-term performance of this water system. By sampling systematically across spatial and temporal scales, and using a range of microbiological tests (TVCs, <em>Legionella</em> spp., <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp., Gram negative bacteria, atypical mycobacteria and fungi), we showed that microbial proliferation was confined to the closed ward. Chlorine treatment had no significant impact on TVCs, but both silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide and tap replacement resulted in significant decreases (<em>p</em> < 0.01). Similarly, the three Gram negative species that were enriched following the reconstruction period (<em>Cupriavidus pauculus, Sphingomonas paucimobilis</em>, and <em>Acidovorax temperans</em>) were less impacted by chlorine than by the other interventions. Following these interventions, fewer than 1 % of samples exceeded our strict local TVC threshold of 10 CFU/ml and GNBs were detected in 7 % of samples. Since the ward reopened to patients in 2022, there has been no return of the high microbiological counts observed immediately after reconstruction. Gram negative bacteria have been detected only sporadically, and the taxa found in samples collected through 0.2 μm point-of-use filters shifted towards species associated with humans. Our systematic approach was successful in returning this hospital water system to a safe state, and once microbial proliferation within the system itself was rectified, further positive results were likely attributable to the interactions of users with the outlets. Distinguishing between possible sources of microbial counts in water is crucial to selecting the most suitable interventions and helping ensure provision of safe water to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 123748"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reversing and controlling microbial proliferation in the water system of a high-risk hospital ward after extended closure and reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Dominique L. Chaput , Kerr Clarkson , Linda Bagrade , Aleksandra Marek , Dennis Kelly , David Watson , Tom Steele , Alistair Leanord\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens occur naturally in water but can pose a health risk to hospital patients who are more vulnerable due to illness or treatment. Ward closure periods can lead to microbial proliferation within water systems, posing a challenge to hospital estates and infection control teams. Following the 3-year closure of our paediatric haemato-oncology ward, water testing showed high total viable counts (TVCs) in over 20 % of samples and elevated counts of numerous Gram negative bacterial species (GNBs) in 73 % of samples, despite daily flushing and continuous chlorine dioxide dosing. We aimed to determine the extent of microbial proliferation, measure the impact of three sequential interventions (system disinfections with chlorine, with silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide, and then tap replacement), and assess the long-term performance of this water system. By sampling systematically across spatial and temporal scales, and using a range of microbiological tests (TVCs, <em>Legionella</em> spp., <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp., Gram negative bacteria, atypical mycobacteria and fungi), we showed that microbial proliferation was confined to the closed ward. Chlorine treatment had no significant impact on TVCs, but both silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide and tap replacement resulted in significant decreases (<em>p</em> < 0.01). Similarly, the three Gram negative species that were enriched following the reconstruction period (<em>Cupriavidus pauculus, Sphingomonas paucimobilis</em>, and <em>Acidovorax temperans</em>) were less impacted by chlorine than by the other interventions. Following these interventions, fewer than 1 % of samples exceeded our strict local TVC threshold of 10 CFU/ml and GNBs were detected in 7 % of samples. Since the ward reopened to patients in 2022, there has been no return of the high microbiological counts observed immediately after reconstruction. Gram negative bacteria have been detected only sporadically, and the taxa found in samples collected through 0.2 μm point-of-use filters shifted towards species associated with humans. Our systematic approach was successful in returning this hospital water system to a safe state, and once microbial proliferation within the system itself was rectified, further positive results were likely attributable to the interactions of users with the outlets. Distinguishing between possible sources of microbial counts in water is crucial to selecting the most suitable interventions and helping ensure provision of safe water to patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":\"282 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425006578\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425006578","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reversing and controlling microbial proliferation in the water system of a high-risk hospital ward after extended closure and reconstruction
Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens occur naturally in water but can pose a health risk to hospital patients who are more vulnerable due to illness or treatment. Ward closure periods can lead to microbial proliferation within water systems, posing a challenge to hospital estates and infection control teams. Following the 3-year closure of our paediatric haemato-oncology ward, water testing showed high total viable counts (TVCs) in over 20 % of samples and elevated counts of numerous Gram negative bacterial species (GNBs) in 73 % of samples, despite daily flushing and continuous chlorine dioxide dosing. We aimed to determine the extent of microbial proliferation, measure the impact of three sequential interventions (system disinfections with chlorine, with silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide, and then tap replacement), and assess the long-term performance of this water system. By sampling systematically across spatial and temporal scales, and using a range of microbiological tests (TVCs, Legionella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Gram negative bacteria, atypical mycobacteria and fungi), we showed that microbial proliferation was confined to the closed ward. Chlorine treatment had no significant impact on TVCs, but both silver stabilised hydrogen peroxide and tap replacement resulted in significant decreases (p < 0.01). Similarly, the three Gram negative species that were enriched following the reconstruction period (Cupriavidus pauculus, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Acidovorax temperans) were less impacted by chlorine than by the other interventions. Following these interventions, fewer than 1 % of samples exceeded our strict local TVC threshold of 10 CFU/ml and GNBs were detected in 7 % of samples. Since the ward reopened to patients in 2022, there has been no return of the high microbiological counts observed immediately after reconstruction. Gram negative bacteria have been detected only sporadically, and the taxa found in samples collected through 0.2 μm point-of-use filters shifted towards species associated with humans. Our systematic approach was successful in returning this hospital water system to a safe state, and once microbial proliferation within the system itself was rectified, further positive results were likely attributable to the interactions of users with the outlets. Distinguishing between possible sources of microbial counts in water is crucial to selecting the most suitable interventions and helping ensure provision of safe water to patients.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.